Conditional openness: young people define practices for successful child protection interventions

References

• Allard, A. (2007). Assembling selves: ‘Choice’ and the classed and gendered schooling experiences of ‘marginalised’ young women. In J. McLeod & A. C. Allard (Eds.), Learning from the margins: Young women, social exclusion and education (pp. 143–156). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berzin, S. (2010). Vulnerability in the transition to adulthood: Defining risk based on youth profiles. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 487–495. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, M. (2010). Child protection, family support and multi-agency working. In Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies Conference, Sydney, August 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Case, S. (2006). Young people ‘at risk’ of what? Challenging risk-focused early intervention as crime prevention. Youth Justice, 6, 171–179. doi:10.1177/1473225406069491
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (2010). What future? Organisational forms, relationship-based social work practice and the changing world order. In G. Ruch, D. Turney, & A. Ward (Eds.), Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice (pp. 148–163). London: Jessica-Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M. (2009). Family group conferences in child welfare: The fit with restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 12, 309–319. doi:10.1080/10282580903105822
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, J. (2013). Re B (A Child) (Care order) (2013) UKSC 33. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 491–501. doi:10.1080/09649069.2013.851313
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, J., Schofield, G., Beckett, C., Philip, G., & Young, J. (2015). Care planning and the role of the Independent Reviewing Officer. Norwich: Centre for Research on Children and Families, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C., Trivette, C., & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empowering families. Cambridge MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Everall, R., & Paulson, B. (2002). The therapeutic alliance: Adolescent perspectives. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2, 78–87. doi:10.1080/14733140212331384857
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., Westlake, D., & Glynn, G. (2012). Parental resistance and social worker skills: Towards a theory of motivational social work. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 118–129. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00837.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (1996). The importance of a children’s rights perspective in litigation. Butterworths Family Law Journal, 2, 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone, J., Dumbrill, G., Leslie, B., Koster, A., Young, M., & Ismaila, A. (2012). Looking at engagement and outcome from the perspectives of child protection workers and parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 112–118. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2014). The welfare principle and the children act: Presumably it’s about welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36, 14–25. doi:10.1080/09649069.2014.887258
   Google Scholar
• Hillian, D., & Reitsma-Street, M. (2003). Parents and youth justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 19–43. doi:10.3138/cjccj.45.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobe, A., & Gorin, S. (2013). ‘If kids don’t feel safe they don't do anything?: Young people’s views on seeking and receiving help from Children’s Social Care Services in England. Child and Family Social Work, 18, 429–438. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00862.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, S., Marcenko, M., Hoagwood, K., & Vesneski, W. (2009). Engaging parents in child welfare services: Bridging family needs and child welfare mandates. Child Welfare, 88, 101–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, B. (2010). Only connect...Building relationships with hard-to-reach people: Establishing rapport with drug-misusing parents and their children. In G. Ruch, D. Turney, & A. Ward (Eds.), Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice (pp. 148–163). London: Jessica-Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. (2005). Promoting positive youth development: Theoretical and empirical bases (White paper prepared for Workshop on the science of adolescent health and development). Washington DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. (2000). The family group conference in the New Zealand children, young persons, and their families act of 1989 (CYP&F): Review and evaluation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 517–556. doi:10.1002/1099-0798(2000)18:4<517::AID-BSL402>3.0.CO;2-E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, J. (1997). Family Group Conferences as a form of court-approved alternative dispute resolution in child abuse and neglect cases. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 31, 57–91.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, S., & Macfarlane, A. (2012). Diversity and inclusion in early childhood education: A bicultural approach to engaging Māori potential. In D. Gordon Burns, A. Gunn, K. Purdue, & N. Surtees (Eds.), Te Aoturoa Tataki, inclusive early childhood education: Perspectives on inclusion, social justice and equity (pp. 21–38). Wellington: NZCER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcenko, M., Brown, R., DeVoy, P., & Conway, D. (2010). Engaging parents: Innovative approaches in child welfare. American Humane, 25, 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people Child and Family Social Work, 12, 278–286. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2015). Understanding service engagement: Young people’s experience of service use. Journal of Social Work, 16, 283–302. doi:10.1177/1468017315569676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. A child-centred system (Report presented to Parliament by the Secretary of Education by Command of Her Majesty). Norwich: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. (2009). Family group conferencing and child protection mediation: Essential tools for prioritizing family engagement in child welfare cases. Family Court Review, 47, 53–68. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.00239.x
   Google Scholar
• Overstreet, S., & Mazza, J. (2003). An ecological-transactional understanding of community violence: Theoretical perspectives. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 66–87. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.1.66.20874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S., Maiter, S., & Manji, S. (2005). Effective intervention in child protective services: Learning from parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 812–824. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, D. (2012). Understanding parental engagement with child welfare services: An integrated model. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 138–148. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. (2005). Including parents, foster parents and parenting caregivers in the assessments and interventions of young children placed in the foster care system. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 180–192. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2011). I remember thinking, why isn’t there someone to help me? Why isn’t there someone who can help me make sense of what I’m going through?’: ‘Instant adulthood’ and the transition of young people out of state care. Journal of Sociology, 47, 411–426. doi:10.1177/1440783311420786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (2010). Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice. London: Jessica-Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, G., & Beek, M. (2009). Growing up in foster care: Providing a secure base through adolescence. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 255–266. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, G., Beek, M., & Ward, E. (2012). Part of the family: Planning for permanence in long-term family foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 244–253.10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & O’Neil, D. (1996). Beyond child rescue: Developing family-centred practice at St Luke’s. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1991). Child care: Welfare, protection or rights? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 13, 469–481. doi:10.1080/09649069108413575
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. (2006). Resilience and young people leaving care: Implications for child welfare policy and practice in the UK. In R. Flynn, P. Dudding, & J. Barber (Eds.), Promoting resilience in child welfare (pp. 131–156). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M., Ward, H., & Courtney, M. (2011). Editorial: International perspectives on young people’s transitions from care to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 2409–2411. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren-Adamson, C., & Lightburn, A. (2004, September). Sensitive outcomes and the development of practice protocols for evaluation. Paper presented at 4th International Seminar on Outcome-based Evaluation in Child and Family Services – Cross National Research Initiatives, Abano Terme.
   Google Scholar