Mapping current issues in administrative justice: austerity and the ‘more bureaucratic rationality’ approach

References

• Adler, M. (2003). A socio-legal approach to administrative justice. Law & Policy, 25, 323.10.1111/lapo.2003.25.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council (2011). Right first time. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (2017, April 8). ‘I worry asylum caseworkers are failing people in their darkest hour’, The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2017/apr/08/asylum-caseworkers-home-office-cuts-syria-war
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, D., & Halliday, S. (2003). The appeal of internal review. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (2012). Social security and child support tribunal hearings: Early analysis of appeals allowed from pilot data. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223139/sscs_appeals.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions. (2015). FOI 4367: Cost of Mandatory Reconsideration.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions. (2016). Employment and support allowance: work capability assessments, mandatory reconsiderations and appeals. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/558953/esa-wca-summary-september-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (2017a), Employment and support allowance: Work capability assessments, mandatory reconsiderations and appeals. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/employment-and-support-allowance-outcomes-of-work-capability-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions (2017b). Personal independence payment statistics. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics#pip-quarterly-experimental-official-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Galligan, D. (1996). Due process and fair procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. (2017). The second independent review of the personal independence payment assessment. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/personal-independence-payment-pip-assessment-second-independent-review
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts and Tribunals Service. (2014). FOI request: Outcomes in paper and oral appeals determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) since 2010.
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts and Tribunals Service. (2015). FOI request 106568: The cost of a social security tribunal appeal.
   Google Scholar
• HM Courts and Tribunals Service. (2016). FOI request104932: Outcome of oral and paper appeals by the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2016a). Response to the Independent Chief Inspector’s report. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/526205/Home_Office_Response_to_ICI_Report_on_Administrative_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2016b). FOI 40415: Timeliness of immigration administrative reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2017). FOI request 42898: Immigration administrative reviews.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee (2013, 2014). Employment and support allowance and work capability assessments ( HC 302 2013-14).
   Google Scholar
• Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (2017). ILPA response to the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration for the inspection on learning from litigation.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration. (2016a). An inspection of family reunion applications. Retrieved from https://icinspector.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/An-inspection-of-family-reunion-applications-January-to-May-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration. (2016b). An inspection of the administrative review processes introduced following the Immigration Act 2014. Retrieved from https://icinspector.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ICIBI-report-on-Admin-Reviews-May-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ison, T. G. (1999). Administrative justice: Is it such a good idea? In M. Harris, & M. Partington (Eds.), Administrative justice in the 21stcentury (pp. 21–41). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mashaw, J. L. (1974). The management side of due process. Cornell Law Review, 59, 772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2016). Transforming our justice system. Retrieved from https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/narrative.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2017). Tribunal statistics quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, E., Cornford, T., Guinchard, A., & Marique, Y. (2016). Access to justice: Beyond the policies and politics of austerity. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. (2016). Complaints about UK government departments and agencies, and some UK public organisations 2015–2016. Retrieved from https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/Complaints_about_parliamentary_departments_2015-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robson, W. A. (1952). Justice and administrative law. London: Stevens & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, F. (2016, October 12). Will disability benefits appeals become less fair? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/oct/12/online-benefits-appeals-tribunals-disabled
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, R. (1994). Internal reviews and the weakening of social security claimants’ rights of appeal. In H. Genn, & G. Richardson (Eds.), Administrative law and government action: The courts and alternative mechanisms of review (pp. 287–307). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Advisory Committee (2016). Decision making and mandatory reconsideration (Occasional paper No. 18).
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R. (2013). Tomorrow’s lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. (2015). Administrative justice, better decisions, and organisational learning’, Public Law, 111.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R, & Tomlinson, J. (2016) Current issues in administrative justice: Examining administrative review, better initial decisions, and tribunal reform (ESRC Report). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2940783
   Google Scholar
• UK Visas and Immigration (2016), Appeal review. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ecm-appeal-review-apl07/ecm-appeal-review-apl07
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. (2014). After Atos Healthcare: Is the Employment and Support Allowance fit for purpose and does the Work Capability Assessment have a future? Disability & Society, 29, 1319–1323.10.1080/09687599.2014.948746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, N. (2006). The adjudication gap – A discussion document. Journal of Social Security Law, 13, 110.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R, & Wikeley, N. (1992). The administration of benefits in Britain: Adjudication officers and the influence of social security appeal tribunals. Public Law, 238.
   Google Scholar