859
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Section

Social rights, child rights, discrimination and devolution: untangling the web

ORCID Icon

References

  • Arnor, O. M. (2014). The differences that make a difference: Recent developments on the discrimination grounds and the margin of appreciation under article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 14(4), 647–670.
  • BBC News. (2017, November 28). Bereavement damages: Unmarried Chorley woman wins legal fight. BBC News, p. 28. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-42152782
  • Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services. Cmd 6404. London: HMSO.
  • Bowen, P. (2016). Does the renaissance of common law rights mean that the Human Rights Act 1998 is now unnecessary? European Human Rights Law Review, 4, 361–377.
  • Bramley, G., Hirsch, D., Littlewood, M., & Watkins, D. (2016). Counting the cost of UK poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Committee for Social Development. (2014). Report on the Pensions Bill (NIA Bill 42/11-16) (NIA 229/11-16). Belfast: NI Assembly.
  • Committee for Social Development. (2016). ‘Minutes of evidence – 22 January 2015’, Report on the Pensions Bill (NIA Bill 42/11-16) (NIA 229/11-16). Belfast: NI Assembly.
  • Committee of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2008). General comment no 19: the right to social security (art 9) (E/C.12/GC/19). Geneva: United Nations.
  • Conservative Party. (2014). Protecting human rights in the UK: The Conservatives’ proposals for changing Britain’s human rights laws. London: Conservative Party.
  • Council of Europe. (2005). Children’s rights under the European Social Charter. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  • Cullen, H. (2005). Is the European Social Charter a charter for children? Irish Jurist, 40, 60–85.
  • Department for Social Development. (2016). Northern Ireland benefit cap information booklet. Belfast: DSD.
  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2012). Government response to the public consultation: Bereavement benefit for the 21st century (Cm 8371). London: DWP.
  • DWP (2015). Social Security Advisory Committee report on bereavement benefit reform: Government response. London: DWP.
  • Fenton-Glynn, C. (2015). Austerity and the benefit cap: In whose best interests? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37(4), 467–469.10.1080/09649069.2015.1121961
  • Gearty, C. (2015). On fantasy island: British politics, English judges and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 1–16.
  • Ghelani, D., & Tonutti, G. (2017). The impact of the two-child limit to tax credits. London: Policy in Practice.
  • Hale, B. (2013, November 28). What’s the point of human rights? Warwick law lecture, Warwick. Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-131128.pdf
  • Hansard. NIA Committee for Health, Social Services and Public Safety, Adoption and Children Bill deb 28 May 2014.
  • Hansard. NIA deb 18 Oct 2016. Vol. 116, no 6, p. 35.
  • Harris, N. (2000). Social security and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in Great Britain. Journal of Social Security Law, 7(1), 9.
  • Harris, N. (2006). European Court of Human Rights confirms that both contributory and non-contributory benefits are covered by Article 1 of Protocol 1. Journal of Social Security Law, 13(1), 3–4.
  • Jheelan,  N. (2007). The enforceability of socio-economic rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 146–157.
  • King, J. (2012). Judging social rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139051750
  • Lammasniemi, L. (2016). The benefit cap and the complexity of discrimination: R (SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. Feminist Legal Studies, 24(2), 215–221.10.1007/s10691-015-9302-8
  • Larkin,  P. M. (2016). Delimiting the gulf between human rights jurisprudence and legislative austerity: The judicial entrenchment of “less eligibility”. Journal of Social Security Law, 23(1), 42–63.
  • Laverack,  P. J. (2016). International human rights law in judicial review: Moohan v Lord Advocate and R (on the application of JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions as guides to the present and the post-Human Rights Act legal landscapes. European Human Rights Law Review,  1,  73–81.
  • Lister,  R. (2008). Unpacking children’s citizenship. In  A.  Invernizzi &  J. Williams (Eds.), Children and citizenship (pp. 9–19). London: Sage.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1963). Citizenship and social class. In Sociology at the crossroads. London: Heinemann.
  • Martin, F. (1998). The family in the constitution – principle and practice. In T. Murphy  & P. Twomey (Eds.), Ireland’s evolving constitution (1937–1997). Oxford: Hart, 79–98.
  • McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724.10.1093/ejil/chn043
  • McLaughlin, E. (2005). Governance and social policy in Northern Ireland (1999–2002): The devolution years and postscript. In  M. Powell, L. Bauld, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Social Policy Review 17, Analysis and Debate in Social PolGovernance and social policy in Northericy (pp. 107–126). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Nolan, A. (2010, October). The child as “democratic citizen”: challenging the participation gap. Public Law, p. 767.
  • Nolan, A. (2011). Children’s socio-economic rights, democracy and the courts. Oxford: Hart.
  • Nolan, A. (Ed.). (2014). Economic and social rights after the global financial crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nolan, A. (2015). Not fit for purpose? Human rights in times of financial and economic crisis. European Human Rights Law Review, 4, 360–371.
  • Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. (2016). Live births by marital status of parents, 1887 to 2015. Belfast: NISRA. Retrieved from http://www.nisra.gov.uk/demography/default.asp8.htm
  • Novitz, T. (2002). Are social rights necessarily collective rights? A critical analysis of the collective complaints procedure to the European Social Charter. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 50–66.
  • Palmer, S. (2016). The benefit cap scheme and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), 34–37.10.1017/S0008197316000192
  • Scottish Government. (2016). A new future for social securitto complete destitutiony: Consultation on social security in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
  • Simpson, M. (2015a). The Agreement as missed opportunity for socio-economic rights in Northern Ireland: Implications of full implementation for social security reform. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 66(2), 105–125.
  • Simpson, M. (2015b). Developing constitutional principles through firefighting: Social security parity in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Security Law, 22(1), 31–49.
  • Simpson, M. (2015c). “Designed to reduce people … to complete destitution”: Human dignity in the active welfare state. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 66–77.
  • Simpson, M. (2017a). The social union after the coalition: devolution, divergence and convergence. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 251–268.10.1017/S0047279416000568
  • Simpson, M. (2017b). Renegotiating social citizenship in the age of devolution. Journal of Law and Society, 44(4), 646–673.10.1111/jols.2017.44.issue-4
  • Simpson, M., McKeever, G., & Gray, A. M. (2017). Social security systems based on dignity and respect. Glasgow: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
  • Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as “being and becomings”: children, childhood and temporality. Children and Society, 22, 303–313.10.1111/chso.2008.22.issue-4
  • Van Bueren, G. (1996). Protecting children’s rights in Europe – a test case strategy. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 171–180.
  • Van Bueren, G. (2002). Including the excluded: The case for an economic, social and cultural Human Rights Act. Public Law, 3, 456–472.
  • Williams, J. (2007). Incorporating children’s rights: the divergence between law and policy. Legal Studies, 27(2), 261–287.10.1111/lest.2007.27.issue-2
  • Woolf, M. (2003). Coming of age? The principle of the best interests of the child. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 205–221.
  • Work and Pensions Committee. (2016). Support for the bereaved. HC 551. London: House of Commons.
  • Young, K. G. (2012). Constituting economic and social rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641932.001.0001

Case law

  • Lindsay v United Kingdom (app 11089/84) [1987] 9 EHRR CD555.
  • Ingze v Austria (app 8695/79) [1988] 10 EHRR 394.
  • R v Ministry of Defence ex parte Smith [1996] QB 517
  • Shackell v UK (app 45851/99) [2000] 27 April 2000
  • Stec v United Kingdom (app 65731/01) [2006] 43 EHRR 1017
  • P (a child), Re [2008] UKHL 38
  • ES v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKUT 200
  • Yigit v Turkey (app 3976/05) [2011] 53 EHRR 25
  • Defence for Children International v Belgium (16/2011) [2013] 56 EHRR SE20
  • Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 22
  • R (on the application of Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 68
  • Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74
  • Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission’s application for judicial review, Re [2013] NICA 37
  • Moohan v Lord Advocate [2014] UKSC 67
  • R (on the application of SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16
  • Hurley v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] EWHC 3382 (admin)
  • Nagy v Hungary (app 53080/13) judgment of 13 December 2016
  • Johnson v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 56
  • R (on the application of MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58
  • McLaughlin’s application for judicial review, Re [2016] NICA 53
  • In the matter of an application by Siobhan McLaughlin for judicial review [2016] NIQB 11
  • Brewster v Northern Ireland Local Government Officers’ Superannuation Committee [2017] UKSC 8
  • R (on the application of DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] EWHC 1446 (admin)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.