Children’s residence in divorce disputes – examination of social work reports to the court

References

• Aaltonen, A.-K. (2009). Lapsioikeus ja lapsen oikeus tuomioistuimissa [Child justice and the right of child in court]. Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Act on Child Custody and Right of Access ( 361/1983).
   Google Scholar
• Antikainen, M. (2007). Sosiaalityöntekijän asiantuntijuus lapsen huolto- ja tapaamissopimuspalvelussa [Social worker’s expertise in the service of child custody] ( Publications E, Social Sciences No. 148). Kuopio: Kuopio University.
   Google Scholar
• Auvinen, M. (2006). Huoltoriidat tuomioistuimissa. Sosiaalitoimi selvittäjänä, sovittelijana, asiantuntijana [Custody disputes in court. Social work’s expert role in resolving, mediating] ( Series A, No. 272). Helsinki: Suomalaisen lakimiesyhdistys.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, G. (2015). Observing children and families: Beyond the surface. Northwich: Critical Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cafcass. (2012) Analysis of congruence between Cafcass recommendations and the final court order. Retrieved from https://www.cafcass.gov.uk/media/126292/cafcass_analysis_of_congruence_study_final_101212.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Arad, B., & Cohen, O. (2004). Custody recommendations of Israeli social workers. Journal of Child Custody, 1, 9–26. doi:10.1300/J190v01n04_02
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., & Strong, P. M. (1997). The interactional study of organisations: A critique of reformulation. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qualitative research (pp. 139–154). London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208758
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2011). Child protection practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-34587-4
   Google Scholar
• Field, R., Jeffries, S., Rathus, Z., & Lynch, A. (2016). Family reports and family violence in Australian family law proceedings: What do we know? Journal of Judicial Administration, 25, 212–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H., Autonen-Vaaraniemi, L., & Kauko, O. (2016). Post-divorce dual residency and sense of places in young people’s narration. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 57, 433–447.  Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10502556.2016.1220283
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H., & Ritala-Koskinen, A. (2017). The multi-local residency of children seen through case descriptions of Finnish child welfare social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 20, 242–252. doi:10.1080/13691457.2016.1185699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, N., Abbott, S., & Race, T. (2015). Family support. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family? London: Mayfield.
   Google Scholar
• Handbook of Child Protection. (2017). National Institute for Health and Welfare. Retrieved from https://www.thl.fi/en/web/handbook-for-child-protection
   Google Scholar
• Jack, G. (2015). ‘I may not know who I am, but I know where I am from’: The meaning of place in social work with children and families. Child & Family Social Work, 20, 415–423. doi:10.1111/cfs.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. (1990). Conciliation, welfare reports and the children act 1989. The Journal of Social Welfare Law, 12, 235–244. doi:10.1080/09649069008412532
   Google Scholar
• James, A., Hay, W., Greatbatch, D., & Walker, C. (1992). The welfare officer as expert? – Reporting for the courts. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 14, 398–410. doi:10.1080/09649069208412368
   Google Scholar
• Kääriäinen, A. (2008). Ero haastaa vanhemmuuden [Challenges of parenthood after divorce]. Helsinki: Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Kääriäinen, A. (2015). Sosiaalitoimen olosuhdeselvitykset teksteinä – johtopäätösten argumentointi ja puolelle asettumisen tulkinnat [Argumentation and decision-making in family custody reports]. Oikeus, 4, 379–403.
   Google Scholar
• Key, E. (1899). Skönhet för alla [Beauty for all]. Stockholm: Bonnier.
   Google Scholar
• Luftman, V., Veltkamp, L., Clark, J., Lannacone, S., & Snooks, H. (2005). Practice guidelines in child custody evaluations for licensed clinical social workers. Clinical Social Work Journal, 33, 327–357. doi:10.1007/s10615-005-4947-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle-Vieira, J. (1987). Kramer vs. Kramer revisited: The social work role in child custody cases. Social Work, 32, 5–10. doi:10.1093/sw/32.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (1994). Toward ethnographies of institutional discourse. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 280–306. doi:10.1177/089124194023003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okkonen, K.-M. (2014). Erolasten arki ei välity tilastoihin [Everyday of children in divorce is not transmitted to the statistics]. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 25, 106–109.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rissanen, A., Kääriäinen, A., Rantala, K., Sarasoja, L., & Aikio, M. (2017). Vuoroasumisen periaatteet ja sopiminen vanhempien ja viranomaisten käsityksinä [Arranging joint physical custody: Parents’ and government authorities’ perceptions]. Janus, 25, 38–56. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/janus/article/view/58714
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., De Wilde, L., & Vanobbergen, B. (2016). Framing the ‘child at risk’ in social work reports: Truth-telling or storytelling? Journal of Social Work, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1468017316644864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiratzki, J. (1999). Custody of children in Sweden: Recent developments. Scandinavian Studies in Law: Legal Issues of the Late 1990’s, 38, 255–262. Retrieved from http://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/38-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sund, R. (2005). Ero! Selviytymisopas miehelle [Divorce! Survival guide for a man]. Helsinki: Minerva.
   Google Scholar
• Taskinen, S. (2001). Lapsen etu erotilanteessa – opas sosiaalitoimelle [Best interest of the child in divorce situations – Guide for social welfare offices] ( Oppaita No.46). Helsinki: Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2008). Trafficking in facts: Writing practices in social work. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 7, 25–42. doi:10.1177/1473325007086414
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, K., & Duffy, J. (2008). Are we listening to children? An examination of the child’s voice in social work reports to the court following parental separation disputes. Child Care in Practice, 14, 275–292. doi:10.1080/13575270802041134
   Google Scholar