Evaluating integrative services in edge-of-care work

References

• Asmussen, K., Doolan, M., & Scott, S. (2012). Intensive interventions suitable for Children on the Edge-of-Care: report and recommendations for Social Finance. London: National Academy for Parenting Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biehal, N., Cusworth, L. S., Wade, J., & Clarke, S. E. (2014). Keeping children safe: Allegations concerning the abuse or neglect of children in care. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Board, H. L. S. (2009). Serious case review: Baby peter. Executive summary. Retrieved on June 1 2016: Available online at www.haringeylscb.org/executive_summary_peter_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer, S. (2009). Children on the edge-of-care: Intensive family preservation services and family intervention projects. Dartington: Research in Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Alrouh, B., Yeend, E., Harwin, J., Shaw, M., Pilling, M., & Kershaw, S. (2015). Connecting events in time to identify a hidden population: Birth mothers and their children in recurrent care proceedings in England. British Journal of Social Work, 45(8), 2241–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Doherty, P., & Yeend, E. (2013). Coventry and warwickshire pre-proceedings pilot, final research report. Retrieved from https://www.cafcass.gov.uk/media/167143/coventry_and_warwickshire_pre-proceedings_pilot_final_report_july_4_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, A. (2013). Signs of Safety in England: An NSPCC commissioned report on the Signs of Safety model in child protection. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A., & Lart, R. (2003). Factors promoting and obstacles hindering joint working: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Integrated Care, 11(2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, L. (2012). Listening to troubled families. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Coster, D., Brookes, H., & Sanger, C. (2015). Evaluation of the baby steps programme: pre and post measures study. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P., Barratt, C., Blumenfeld, F., Rahemtulla, Z., Taggart, D., & Turton, J. (2017). Reducing recurrent care proceedings: Initial evidence from new interventions. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(3), 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crittenden, P. M. (2006). Why do inadequate parents do what they do? . In O. Mayseless (Ed.), Parenting representations: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 388–433). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. June 28 2016. Building a safe and confident future: Progress report from the social work reform board. (2010) Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/building-a-safe-and-confident-future-progress-report-from-the-social-work-reform-board
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2015). 2010 to 2015 Government policy: Looked-after children and adoption. London.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017a). Children looked after in England including adoption: 2016-2017. London.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017b). Characteristics of children in need 2016–2017. London.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, P. (2015). Evaluation of the face to face service: Using a solution focussed approach with children and young people in care or on the edge-of-care. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., & Ashmore, Z. (2015). Multisystemic therapy as an intervention for young people on the edge-of-care. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 1968–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granville, S. (2016). A qualitative inquiry of clinicians’ relational experiences within a perinatal infant mental health service contextualised with quantitative analysis of outcomes (unpublished doctoral dissertation). UK: University of Essex.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwin, J., Alrouh, B., Ryan, M., & Tunnard, J. (2014). Introducing the main findings from: Changing lifestyles, keeping children safe: An evaluation of the first family drug and alcohol court (FDAC) in care proceedings. London: Brunel University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2003). Every child matters. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, L., & McDermid, S. (2012). Understanding costs and outcomes in child welfare services: A comprehensive costing approach to managing your resources. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2014). Meta-theoretical paradigms underpinning risk in child welfare: Towards a position of methodological pluralism. Children and Youth Services Review, 47, 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consultingand Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessiman, P., Keogh, P., & Brophy, J. (2009). An early process evaluation of the public law outline in family courts. Ministry of Justice Research Series 10/09.
   Google Scholar
• Laming, H. (2003). The Victoria Climbié Inquiry. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273183/5730.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Masson, J. M., Dickens, J., Bader, K., & Young, J. (2013). Partnership by law? The pre-proceedings process for families on the edge-of-care proceedings. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2281146
   Google Scholar
• Milford, R., & Oates, J. (2009).Universal screening and early intervention for maternal mental health and attachment difficulties. Community Practitioner, 82(8),30-33.
   Google Scholar
• Minnis, H., Everett, K., Pelosi, A. J., Dunn, J., & Knapp, M. (2006). Children in foster care: Mental health, service use and costs. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(2), 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. (2015). Children’s attachment: Attachment in children and young people who are adopted from care, in care or at high risk of going into care. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Pause. (2015). Pause: Creating space for change, national launch conference briefing. Unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Ritschel, L. A., Tone, E. B., Schoemann, A. M., & Lim, N. E. (2015). Psychometric properties of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale across demographic groups. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 944–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, M., MacDonald, D. E., & Carter, J. C. (2016). Emotion regulation difficulties in anorexia nervosa: Associations with improvements in eating psychopathology. Journal of Eating Disorders, 4, 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, C. (2005). The contribution of relational theory to social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 75(3), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, J. R., & Schore, A. N. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrader-McMillan, A., & Barlow, J. (2017). Improving the effectiveness of the child protection system: A review of the literature. London: Early Intervention Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Simkiss, D. E., MacCallum, F., Fan, E. E. Y., Oates, J. M., Kimani, P. K., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Validation of the mothers object relations scales in 2–4 year old children and comparison with the child–Parent relationship scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, D., Platt, D., Selwyn, J., & Farmer, E. (2011). Social work assessment of children in need: What do we know? Messages from research. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H., Brown, R., & Hyde-Dryden, G. (2014). Assessing parental capacity to change when children are on the edge-of-care: An overview of current research evidence. Loughborough: Loughborough University Centre for Child and Family Research for the Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Welbourne, P. (2008). Safeguarding children on the edge-of-care: Policy for keeping children safe after the review of the child care proceedings system, care matters and the carter review of legal aid. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 20(3), 335–358.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, J. (2017). Personal communication from Dr Woodman at Thomas Coram research unit, based on dfE data (2017a and 2017b above) and other literature including Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213416302708
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K., Bond, C., Humphrey, N., & Symes, W. (2011). Systematic review of Solution focussed Brief Therapy (SFBT) for children and families. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar