High-conflict divorce involving children: parents’ meaning-making and agency

References

• Andrews, M., Day Sclater, S., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (2004). Narrative research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 97–112). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2011). Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(2), 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., & Bala, N. (2010). Toward the differentiation of high-conflict families: An analysis of social science research and Canadian case law. Family Court Review, 48(3), 403–416.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. B. (2003). Child custody, law, and women’s work. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. B. (2010). Autonomy for mothers? Relational theory and parenting apart. Feminist Legal Studies, 18(2), 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, A., Balmer, N., & Pleasence, P. (2005). Social exclusion and civil law: Experience of civil justice problems among vulnerable groups. Social Policy and Administration, 39(3), 302–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, L. A. (2015). Relational theory and choice rhetoric in the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 29(2), 251–308.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (2015). Men, gender and fathers’ rights ‘after equality’: New formulations of rights and responsibilities in family justice. In R. Leckey (Ed.), After legal equality: Family, sex, kinship (pp. 59–76). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, A. (2007). The legal problems of everyday life: The nature, extent and consequences of justiciable problems experienced by Canadians. Ottawa: Department of Justice. Retrieved from www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr07_la1-rr07_aj1/rr07_la1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dagdeviren, H., Donoghue, M., & Promberger, M. (2016). Resilience, hardship and social conditions. Journal of Social Policy, 45(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day Sclater, S. (1997). Narratives of divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19(4), 423–441.
   Google Scholar
• Day Sclater, S. (1999). Divorce: A psychosocial study. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Divorce Act. (1985). R. S. C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd supp.), s. 2 (1). Retrieved from http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/D-3.4/page-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work and gendered moral rationalities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Family Law Act. (2011). S.B.C. 2011, c. 25. Victoria, BC: Queen’s Printer. Retrieved from http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_11025_01.
   Google Scholar
• Family Relations Act. (1996). R.S.B.C. 1996, c 128. Online BC Laws. Retrieved from http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/consol21/consol21/00_96128_01
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B., Smyth, B., Maclean, M., & Roberts, C. (2011). Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(3), 318–337.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Füredi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galletta, A., & Cross, W. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. (2016). Questioning tales of ‘ordinary magic’: ‘Resilience’ and neo-liberal reasoning. British Journal of Social Work, 46(7), 1909–1925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2016). Connecting life span development with the sociology of the life course: A new direction. Sociology, 50(2), 301–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris, A. (2016). Care and danger: Feminism and therapy culture. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 69, 113–140.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. (2013). Bouncing back? Recession, resilience and everyday lives. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M., & Waite, L. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(3), 344–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., & Roseby, V. (1997). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaganas, F., & Day Sclater, S. (2004). Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of ‘good’ parents. Feminist Legal Studies, 12(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (2000). Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, V. (2003). Lone motherhood past and present: The life stories of Finnish lone mothers. Nora: Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 11(1), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, K. (2009). New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 413–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (2011). Making sense of fatherhood: Gender, caring and work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, England and Wales. (2011). Family justice review interim report: Executive summary and recommendations. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217356/family-justice-review-exec-summ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2011). Locating “family practices.”. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 14. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/16/4/14.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelsky, J. (2011). Law’s relations: A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P. (2011). Family law and the indissolubility of parenthood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., Balmer, N., Buck, A., O’Grady, A., & Genn, H. (2004). Civil law problems and morbidity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(7), 552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkingham, J. (2006). Private troubles, private solutions: Poverty among divorced women and the politics of support enforcement and child custody determination. In B. Burtch & N. Larsen (Eds.), Law in society: Canadian readings (2nd ed., pp. 296–317). Toronto: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkingham, J., Fuller, S., & Kershaw, P. (2010). Lone motherhood, welfare reform and active citizen subjectivity. Critical Social Policy, 30(2), 267–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neoliberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seccombe, K. (2002). Beating the odds versus changing the odds: Poverty, resilience, and family policy. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 384–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethic of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments? Cambridge. UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, R. (2015). The neoliberal context of family law reform in British Columbia, Canada: Implications for access to (family) justice. In M. Maclean, J. Eekelaar, & B. Bastard (Eds.), Delivering family justice in the 21st century (pp. 15–38). Oñati International Series in Law and Society. Oxford: Hart-Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, R. (2016). High conflict post-separation disputes involving family violence in a neoliberal context: British Columbia, Canada. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 28(2), 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, R., & Boyd, S. B. (2014). Family law reform in (neoliberal) context: British Columbia’s new Family Law Act. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 28(1), 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, R., & Funk, L. (2008). Mothers’ health, responsibilization, and choice in family care work after separation/divorce. Canadian Journal of Public Health (Suppl Nov.–Dec.),33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Treloar, R., & Funk, L. (2011). Mothers’ health, responsibilization, and choice in family care work after separation/divorce. In C. Benoit & H. Hallgrimsdottir (Eds.), Valuing care work: Comparative perspectives on Canada, Finland and Iceland (pp. 153–170). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickrama, K., Lorenz, F., Conger, R., Elder, G., Abraham, W., & Fang, S. (2006). Changes in family financial circumstances and the physical health of married and recently divorced mothers. Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 123–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrenn, M. V. (2015). Agency and neoliberalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1231–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar