1,959
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A voice or a choice? Children’s views on participating in decisions about post-separation contact with domestically abusive fathers

References

  • Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2004). Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. Barkingside: Barnardos.
  • Bacon, K. (2014). Rethinking children’s citzenship: Negotiating structure, shaping meanings. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 1, 21–42.
  • Bagshaw, D. (2007). Reshaping responses to children when parents are separating: Hearing children’s voices in transition. Australian Social Work, 60, 450–465.
  • Bailey-Harris, R., Barron, J., & Pearce, J. (1999). From utility to rights? The presumption of contact in practice. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13, 111–131.
  • Barnett, C., & Wilson, C. J. (2004). Children’s wishes in the Australian family court: Are they wishful thinking? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 73–78.
  • Birnbaum, R., Bala, N., & Cyr, F. (2011). Children’s experiences with family justice professionals in Ontario and Ohio. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25, 398–422.
  • Birnbaum, R., & Saini, M. (2012). A qualitative synthesis of children’s participation in custody disputes. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 400–409.
  • Bosisio, R. (2012). Children’s right to be heard: What children think. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20, 141–154.
  • Brown, T., & Alexander, R. (2007). Child abuse and family law: Understanding the issues facing human service and legal professionals. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Buss, E. (1996). ‘You’re my what?’ The problem of children’s misperceptions of their lawyers’ roles. Fordham Law Review, 64, 1699–1762.
  • Buss, E. (1999). Confronting developmental barriers to the empowerment of child clients. Cornell Law Review, 84, 895–966.
  • Butler, I., Scanlan, L., Douglas, G., & Murch, M. (2002). Children’s involvement in the parents’ divorce: Implications for practice. Children & Society, 16, 89–102.
  • Caffrey, L. (2013). Hearing the ‘voice of the child’? The role of child contact centres in the family justice system. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 25, 357–3179.
  • Caffrey, L. (2017). The importance of perceived organisational goals: A systems thinking approach to understanding child safeguarding in the context of domestic abuse. Child Abuse Review, 26, 339–350.
  • Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘’You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21, 103–112.
  • Coy, M., Perks, K., Scott, E., & Tweedale, R. (2012). Picking up the pieces: Domestic violence and child contact. London: Rights of Women/Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.
  • Emond, R. (2008). Children’s voices, children’s rights. In A. Kendrick (Ed.), Residential child care: Prospects and challenges (pp. 183–195). London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Ewing, J., Hunter, R., Barlow, A., & Smithson, J. (2015). Children’s voices: Centre-stage or side-lined in out-of-court dispute resolution in England and Wales? Child and Family Law Quarterly, 27, 43–62.
  • Featherstone, B, & Peckover, S. (2007). Letting them get away with it: fathers, domestic violence and child welfare. Critical Social Policy, 27(2), 181-202. doi:10.1177/0261018306075708
  • Harne, L. (2011). Violent fathering and the risks to children: The need for change. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Harrison, C. (2008). Implacably hostile or appropriately protective? Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 381–405.
  • Herring, J. (2014). The welfare principle and the children act: Presumably it’s about welfare? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36, 14–25.
  • Holt, S. (2011). Domestic abuse and child contact: Positioning children in the decision-making process. Child Care in Practice, 17, 327–346.
  • Holt, S. (2016a). The voice of the child in family law: A discussion paper. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 139–145.
  • Holt, S. (2016b). ‘Quality contact’ post separation/divorce: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 92–99.
  • Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 797–810.
  • Holt, S., & Ward, M. (2015). Evaluation of the Sonas Safe Home Project. Dublin: Sonas Domestic Violence Charity.
  • Houghton, C. (2018). Voice, agency, power: A framework for young survivors: Participation in national domestic abuse policy-making. In S. Holt., C. Overlien, & J. Devaney (Eds.), Responding to domestic violence: Emerging challenges for policy, practice and research in Europe (pp. 77–96). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Hunter, R. (2007). Close encounters of a judicial kind: ‘Hearing’ children’s ‘voices’ in family law proceedings. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19, 283–303.
  • Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., & Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody and domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • James, A. L., & James, A. (1999). Pump up the volume: Listening to children in separation and divorce. Childhood, 6, 189–206.
  • James, A. L., James, A., & McNamee, S. (2004). Turn down the volume? Not hearing children in family proceedings. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 16, 189–202.
  • Kernic, M. A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L. (2005). Children in the crossfire: Child custody determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 991–1021.
  • Kjorholt, A. T. (2002). Small is powerful: Discourses on ‘children and participation’ in Norway. Childhood, 9, 63–82.
  • Lamb, M. E. (2007). Improving the quality of parent-child contact in separating families. In M. Maclean (Ed.), Parenting after partnering: Containing conflict after separation (pp. 11–28). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Mantle, G., Moules, T., Johnson, K., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., & Shaffer, R. (2007). Whose wishes and feelings? Children’s autonomy and parental influence in family court enquiries. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 785–805.
  • Masson, J. (2003). Paternalism, participation and placation: Young people’s experiences of representation in child protection proceedings in England and Wales. In J. Dewar & S. Parker (Eds.), Family law: Processes, practices, pressures (pp. 79–98). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Maudeni, T. (2002). Seen but not heard? Focusing on the needs of children of divorced parents in Gaborone and surrounding areas, Botswana. Childhood, 9, 227–302.
  • McDonald, G. (2014). Domestic violence and private family law proceedings: Promoting child welfare or promoting contact. Bath: University of Bath.
  • Morrow, V. (1999). ‘We are people too’: Children’s and young people’s perspectives on children’s rights and decision-making in England. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 7, 149–170.
  • Mullender, A., Hague, G., Iman, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., & Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage.
  • Murphy, C., & Holt, S. (2013). Evaluation of the Barnardos and One Family Pilot Child Contact Centre Project. Dublin: Barnardos/One Family.
  • Neale, B. (2002). Dialogues with children: Children, divorce and citizenship. Childhood, 9, 455–475.
  • Overlien, C. (2012). Domestic violence: Children’s strategies. Oslo: University of Oslo.
  • Overlien, C., & Holt, S. (2018). Including children and adolescents in domestic violence research: When myths and misconceptions compromise participation. In S. Holt, C. Overlien, & J. Devaney (Eds.), Responding to domestic violence: Emerging challenges for policy, practice and research in Europe (pp. 97–112). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Piper, C. (1997). Ascertaining the wishes and feelings of the child. Family Law, 27, 796–800.
  • Piper, C. (1999). The wishes and feelings of the child. In S. Day-Sclater & C. Piper (Eds.), Undercurrents of divorce (pp. 77–98). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  • Piper, C. (2000). Assumptions about children’s best interests. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 22, 261–276.
  • Powell, M. A., & Smith, A. B. (2009). Children’s participation rights in research. Childhood, 16, 124–142.
  • Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families: Life after parental separation. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
  • AMICA; Radford, L., & Sayer, S. (1999). Unreasonable fears? Child contact in the context of domestic violence: A survey of mothers’ perceptions of harm. Bristol: Women’s Aid Federation of England.
  • Rhoades, H. (2002). The ‘no contact mother’: Reconstructions of motherhood in the era of the ‘new father’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 16, 71–94.
  • Roche, J. (1999). Children and divorce: A private affair? In S. Day-Sclater & C. Piper (Eds.), Undercurrents of divorce (pp. 35–75). Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  • Sawyer, C. (2000). Effective support services for children and young people when parental relationships break-down: A child centred approach. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11, 447–452.
  • Schofield, G. (1998). Making sense of the ascertainable wishes and feelings of insecurely attached children. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 10, 429–443.
  • Skjorten, K. (2013). Children’s voices in Norwegian custody cases. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 27, 289–309.
  • Smart, C. (2002). From children’s shoes to children’s voices. Family Court Review, 40, 307–319.
  • Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1997). Arguments against virtue: Must contact be enforced? Family Law, 27, 332–336.
  • Smith, A. B., Taylor, N. J., & Tapp, P. (2003). Rethinking children’s involvement in decision-making after parental separation. Childhood, 10, 201–216.
  • Stanley, N. (2006). Domestic violence and child protection: Directions for good practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Sutherland, E. (2014). Listening to the child’s voice in the family setting: From aspiration to reality. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 26, 152–172.
  • Thiara, R., & Harrison, C. (2016). Safe not sorry: Supporting the campaign for safer child contact. Bristol: Women’s Aid.
  • Thiara, R., & Humphreys, C. (2017). Absent presence: The ongoing impact of men’s violence on the mother–Child relationship. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 137–145.
  • Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (1998). When children’s wishes and feelings clash with their ‘best interests’. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 6, 137–154.
  • Thomas, N., & O’Kane, C. (2000). Discovering what children think: Connections between research and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 819–835.
  • Tisdall, K. M., Bray, R., & Marshall, K. (2004). Children’s participation in family law proceedings: A step too far or a step too small? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26, 17–33.
  • Trinder, L. (1997). Competing constructions of childhood: Children’s rights and children’s wishes in divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19, 291–305.
  • Trinder, L., Beek, M., & Connolly, J. (2002). Making contact: How parents and children negotiate and experience contact after divorce. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. HMSO: London
  • Van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20, 129–138.
  • Vis, S. A., & Fossum, S. (2013). Representation of children’s views in court hearings about custody and parental visitations: A comparison between what children wanted and what the court rules. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2101–2109.
  • Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases: Why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21, 7–23.
  • Women’s Aid. (2016). Nineteen Child Homicides. Bristol: Author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.