Willingness to innovate in family law solicitor practice in England and Wales: a qualitative study

References

• Ambert, A., Adler, P., and Detzner, D., 1995. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of marriage and family, 57, 879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagust, J., 2013. The legal profession and the business of law. Sydney law review, 35, 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey-Harris, R., Barron, J., and Pearce, J., 1999. Settlement culture and the use of the ‘no order’ principle under the children act 1989. Child and family law quarterly, 11, 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, A., et al., 2014. Mapping paths to family justice, briefing paper. Exeter: University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, C., 2013. Self-represented litigants: the overlooked and unintended consequences of legal aid reform. Journal of social welfare and family law, 35, 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Clementi, D., 2004. Report of the review of the regulatory framework for legal services in England and Wales. Available from: www.legal-services-review.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R., 2016. Wellbeing in the legal profession: reflections on recent developments (or, what do we talk about, when we talk about wellbeing?). International journal of the legal profession, 23, 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G., 1988. Partisans and mediators. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., Cretney, S., and Collins, J., 1994. Simple quarrels. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. and Pearce, J., 1999. The hybrid practitioner. Family law (Chichester), 29, 547–558.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work & Pensions, 2014. Sorting out separation web app: evaluation of effectiveness. London: Department for Work & Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, J., 2010. Can the centre hold? reflections on two decades of family law reform in Australia. Child and family law quarterly, 22, 377–386.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A., 2016. Autonomy and family justice. Child and family law quarterly, 28, 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M., and Beinart, S., 2000. Family lawyers. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J., 2011. Sociological analysis of professionalism: past, present and future. Comparative sociology, 10, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hanlon, G., 1997. A profession in transition? – lawyers, the market and significant others. Modern law review, 60, 799–822.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Justice Committee, 2010. Written evidence from the law society of England and Wales (FC 26). Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmjust/518/518vw24.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ingleby, R., 1992. Solicitors and divorce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute, 2015. Qualitative research exploring experiences and perceptions of unbundled legal services. Report to the Legal Services Board and Legal Services Consumer Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Kaganas, F., 2017. Justifying the LASPO Act: authenticity, necessity, suitability, responsibility and autonomy. Journal of social welfare and family law, 39, 168–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, 1998. ‘Being sensible’: images and practices of the new family lawyers. Journal of social policy, 28, 249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Society of England and Wales, 2015. Proposal on the provision of court and tribunal estate in England and Wales: the law society response. London: the Law Society of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Law Society of England and Wales, 2017. LASPO four years on: a law society review. London: the Law Society of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M. and Eekelaar, J., 2016. Lawyers and mediators. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, L., Maiman, R.J., and McEwen, C.A., 1995. The passenger decides on the destination and I decide on the route’: are divorce lawyers ‘expensive cab drivers’? International journal of law and the family, 9, 286–310.
   Google Scholar
• Mawby, R. and Worrall, A., 2013. Doing probation work. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (MoJ), 2011. Family justice review: final report. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (MoJ), 2014. Legal aid statistics in England and Wales: April to June 2014. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (MoJ), 2017. Family court statistics quarterly, England and Wales Annual 2017 including October to December 2017. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, B. and Smart, C., 1997. ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ lawyers? Struggling in the shadow of the new law. Journal of social welfare and family law, 19, 377–402.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, C., 1999. How do you define a family lawyer? Legal studies, 19, 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Resolution, 2018. Changing practices – the future starts now. Melanie Bataillard-Samuel. Kent: The Review.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W.L.F., 1995. Divorce lawyers and their clients. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. and Paterson, A. (2013). Face to face legal services and their alternatives: global lessons from the digital revolution. Report to the Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerlad, H., 2007. Researching and theorizing the processes of professional identity formation. Journal of law and society, 34, 190–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., et al., 2014. Litigants in person in private family law cases. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. and Kay, F.M., 2008. The professionalism of practising law: a comparison across work contexts. Journal of organizational behaviour, 29, 1021–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, J. and Bishop, S., 2011. Healthcare identities at the crossroads of service modernisation: the transfer of NHS clinicians to the independent sector? Sociology of health & illness, 33, 661–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webley, L., 2004. Divorce solicitors and ethical approaches – the best interests of the client and/or the best interests of the family? Legal ethics, 7, 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, L., 2010. Gate-keeper, supervisor or mentor? The role of professional bodies in the regulation and professional development of solicitors and family mediators undertaking divorce matters in England and Wales. Journal of social welfare and family law, 32, 119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Webley, L. and Duff, L., 2007. Women solicitors as a barometer for problems within the legal profession – time to put values before profits? Journal of law and society, 34, 374–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaby, C., Phillips, J., and Fowler, A., 2016. Spillover and work-family conflict in probation practice: managing the boundary between work and home life. European journal of probation, 8 (3), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K., 2007. The role of solicitors in divorce: a note of caution. Child and family law quarterly, 19, 481–495.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K., 2011. The evolving role of the family lawyer: the impact of collaborative law on family law practice. Child and family law quarterly, 23, 370–392.
   Google Scholar