581
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Section

What is a good post-separation relationship? The perspectives of Australian parents

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahrons, C., 1994. The good divorce: keeping your family together when your marriage comes apart. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Alexander, R., 2015. Family violence in parenting cases in Australia under the family law act 1975 (Cth): the journey so far–where are we now and are we there yet? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 29 (3), 313–340.
  • Amato, P.R., Kane, J.B., and James, S., 2011. Reconsidering the “good divorce”. Family Relations, 60 (5), 511–524.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016. 2016 CensusQuickStats. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available from: http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/036 Accessed 16 May 2018.
  • Bakker, W., Karsten, L., and Mulder, C.H., 2015. Family routines and rituals following separation: continuity and change. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4 (3), 365–382.
  • Baum, N., 2004. Typology of post-divorce parental relationships and behaviors. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 41 (3–4), 53–79.
  • Beckmeyer, J.J., Coleman, M., and Ganong, L.H., 2014. Postdivorce coparenting typologies and children’s adjustment. Family Relations, 63 (4), 526–537.
  • Berns, S., 2000. Folktales of legality: family law in the procedural republic. The narrative structure of family law. Law and Critique, 11 (1), 1–24.
  • Campo, M., et al., 2012. Shared parenting time in Australia: exploring children’s views. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34 (3), 295–313.
  • Dewar, J., 1998. The normal chaos of family law. The Modern Law Review, 61 (4), 467–485.
  • Edwards, R. and Gillies, V., 2012. Farewell to family? Notes on an argument for retaining the concept. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1 (1), 63–69.
  • Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., and Tolmie, J., 2010. Between a rock and a hard place: resident mothers and the moral dilemmas they face during custody disputes. Feminist Legal Studies, 18 (3), 253–274.
  • Fehlberg, B., et al., 2013. Post-separation parenting and financial arrangements: exploring changes over time. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 27 (3), 359–380.
  • Fehlberg, B., et al., 2011. Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25 (3), 318–337.
  • Ferraro, A.J., et al., 2016. Postdivorce parenting: A study of recently divorced mothers and fathers. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 57 (7), 485–503.
  • Harmer, A.L. and Goodman-Delahunty, J., 2013. Practitioners’ opinions of best interests of the child in Australian legislation. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21 (2), 251–271.
  • Jamison, T.B., et al., 2014. Transitioning to postdivorce family life: A grounded theory investigation of resilience in coparenting. Family Relations, 63 (3), 411–423.
  • Kaspiew, R., et al., 2015. Evaluation of the 2012 family violence amendments: synthesis report. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Kaspiew, R., et al., 2011. Legislative aspirations and social realities: empirical reflections on Australia’s 2006 family law reforms. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 33 (4), 397–418.
  • Lacroix, C., 2006. Freedom, desire and power: gender processes and presumptions of shared care and responsibility after parental separation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29 (2), 184–196.
  • LaRossa, R., 2005. Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (4), 837–857.
  • Maccoby, E.E. and Mnookin, R.H., 1992. Dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody. New Haven: Harvard University Press.
  • Madden‐Derdich, D.A. and Leonard, S.A., 2002. Shared experiences, unique realities: formerly married mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of parenting and custody after divorce. Family Relations, 51 (1), 37–45.
  • Markham, M.S. and Coleman, C., 2012. The good, the bad, and the ugly: divorced mothers’ experiences with coparenting. Family Relations, 61 (4), 586–600.
  • Moore, E., 2017. Divorce, families and emotion work: ‘Only death will make us part’. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Morgan, D., 2011. Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke, U.K.: PalgraveMacmillan.
  • Neale, B. and Smart, C., 1997. Experiments with parenthood? Sociology, 31 (2), 201–219.
  • Qu, L., et al., 2014. Post-separation parenting, property and relationship dynamics after five years. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Reece, H., 1996. The paramountcy principle. Current Legal Problems, 49 (1), 267–304.
  • Sigurdardóttir, S., Júlíusdóttir, S., and Pálsdóttir, D., 2018. Children’s voices on equal time-sharing arrangement following parents’ divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40 (2), 1–17.
  • Smart, C., 1997. Wishful thinking and harmful tinkering? Sociological reflections on family policy. Journal of Social Policy, 26 (3), 301–321.
  • Smart, C., 2004. Changing landscapes of family life: rethinking divorce. Social Policy and Society, 3 (4), 401–408.
  • Smart, C. and May, V., 2004. Why can’t they agree? The underlying complexity of contact and residence disputes. The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 26 (4), 347–360.
  • Smyth, B. and Chisholm, R., 2017. Shared‐time parenting after separation in Australia: precursors, prevalence, and postreform patterns. Family Court Review, 55 (4), 586–603.
  • Tang, S. and Quah, S.E.L., 2017. Heteronormativity and sexuality politics in Singapore: the female-headed households of divorced and lesbian mothers. Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1177/1440783317742530
  • Théry, I., 1986. “The interest of the child” and the regulation of the post-divorce family. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 14, 341.
  • Van Krieken, R., 2005. The ‘best interests of the child’ and parental separation: on the ‘civilizing of parents’. The Modern Law Review, 68 (1), 25–48.
  • Wall, K. and Gouveia, R., 2014. Changing meanings of family in personal relationships. Current Sociology, 62 (3), 352–373.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.