What’s the point of parenthood? The agreed parenthood provisions under the HFE Act 2008 and inconsistency with intention

References

• Bainham, A., 1999. Parentage, parenthood and parental responsibility: subtle, elusive yet important distinctions. In: A. Bainham, S. Day Sclater, and M. Richards, eds. What is a parent? A socio-legal analysis. Oxford: Hart, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bainham, A., 2008. What is the point of birth registration? CFLQ, 4, 449–474.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, L., 2017. Challenging normative constructions of parentage in Ireland. Journal of social welfare and family law, 39 (3), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannen, J. and O’Brian, M., 1996. Children in families: research and Policy. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, E., 1790. Reflections on the revolution in France. James Dodsley, Pall Mall (London 1790).
   Google Scholar
• Callus, T., 2012. A new parenthood paradigm for 21st century Family Law in England & Wales? Legal Studies, 32, 347–368.
   Google Scholar
• Cammu, N., 2018. How should we name the parents? The challenges of plus-two-parent families for legal kinship terminology. International journal of law, policy and the family, 31, 328–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., 2007. Conceiving parents through law. International journal of law, policy and the family, 21 (2), 242–273.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, J., 2005. The legal definition of parenthood: uncertainty at the core of family identity. Louisiana Law Review, 65, 1295–1344.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work and Pensions and Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2008. Joint Birth Registration: Recording Responsibly, Cm 7293.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, (2006) Review of the human fertilisation and embryology Act Proposals for revised legislation (including establishment of the regulatory authority for tissue and embryos). Cm 6989 Available from: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Review_HFEA_Act_White_Paper_DH.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A., 2007. If only we can find the appropriate terms to use the issue will be solved: law, identity and parenthood. Child and family law quarterly, 19 (4), 458–480.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., 2006. Family Law and Personal Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R.A., 1992. Justice across the generations. In: P. Laslett and J. Fishkin, eds. Justice between age groups and generations. USA: Yale University Press, 84–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ghevaert, L., 2016. Fertility treatment and consent to legal parenthood: no room for errors, Family Law News and Comment, 13th October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Honohan, I., 2002. Civic Republicanism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons, 2005. Human reproductive technologies and the law, Fifth Report of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2004–2005) HC 7-I, II.
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords, 2007. Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill, Session 2006–2007, HL Paper 169-I; HC Paper 630-II.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, 2014a. Fertility Treatment Trends. London: HFEA.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, 2014b. Chief executive letter, Legal Parenthood. London: HFEA, CE CE(14) 02.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, 2016. Chief executive letter, Legal Parenthood. London: HFEA. CE (16) 01, 4th April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, 2017. State of the Fertility Sector, Report 2016–2017, HFEA, December 2017. Available from: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/2437/hfea_state_of_the_sector_report_tagged.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E., 2006. What is a parent? In: A. Diduck and K. O’Donovan, eds. Feminist perspectives on family law. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, J. and Oderberg, D., 2005. Assisted reproduction, the welfare principle and common good. Medical law review, 13, 328–356.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre, P., 1985. L’inestimable objet de la transmission: étude sur le principe généalogique. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre, P., 1992. Leçons VI, Les enfants du texte: etude sur la function parentale des Etats. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz:, M., 2009. Procreative reason-relevance: on the moral significance of why we have children. Bioethics, 23 (5), 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz, M., 2011. Rethinking procreation: why it matters why we have children. Journal of applies philosophy, 28 (2), 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz, M., 2012. The two-parent limitation in ART parentage law. old-fashioned law for new-fashioned families. In: D. Cutas and S. Chan, eds. Families - beyond the nuclear ideal: science, ethics and society. Bloomsbury: London/New York, 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, J. and Harrison, C. (1994) Identity: mapping the Frontiers. Paper presented at the 8th World Congress of the International Society for Family Law 2, June 28–July 2 1994.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, J., 2012. The role of sexual partnership in UK family law. In: D. Cutas and S. Chan, eds. Families - beyond the nuclear ideal: science,ethics and society. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, J. and Sheldon, S., 2008. The HFE Act 2008 and the tenacity of the sexual family form. Modern Law Review, 73 (2), 175–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millbank, J., 2008. The limits of functional family: lesbian mother litigation in the era of the eternal biological family’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 22 (2), 149–177.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, A., 2018. Idnetity rights and sensitive ethical questions: the ECHR and the regulation of surrogacy arrangements. Medical Law Review, 26 (3), 449–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M., 2006. Genes, genealogies and paternity: making babies in the twenty-first century. In: J.R. Spencer and A. Du Bois-Pedain, eds., Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Hart, 71.
   Google Scholar
• Shanley, M., 2001. Making babies, making families: what matters most in an age of reproductive technologies, surrogacy, adoption and same-sex and unwed parents. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., 2013. Tangling the web of legal parenthood: legal responses to the use of known donors in lesbian parenting arrangements. Legal studies, 33 (3), 355–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, L., 1979. The Family, sex, and marriage in England, 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row (1977 edition).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., 2009. Identity and obligation in a transgenerational polity. In: A. Goseeries and L.H. Meyer, eds. Intergenerational justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 25–49.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, B., 1993. Hatching the egg: a child-centred perspective on parents’ rights. Cardoza Law review, 14, 1747–1754.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A.H., 1998. “Reconceiving the “Family””: challenging the paradigm of the exclusive family. American university journal of gender and law, 6, 505–555.
   Google Scholar