Shared parental leave and the sexual family: the importance of encouraging men to care

References

• Auchmuty, R., 2012. Law and the power of feminism: how marriage lost its power to oppress women. Feminist legal studies, 20, 71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, K., Bogg, A., and Novitz, T., 2018. ‘Voice’ and ‘Choice’ in modern working practices: problems with the taylor review. Industrial law journal, 47, 46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay, L., 2011. Liberal Daddy quotas: why men should take care of the children, and how liberals can get them to do it. Hypatia, 28, 163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, A. and Duncan, S., 2000. Supporting families? New labour’s communitarianism and the ‘rationality mistake’: part I. Journal of social welfare and family law, 22, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Biblarz, T.J. and Stacey, J., 2010. How does the gender of parents matter? (2010). Journal of marriage and family, 72, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, P., 1997. Caring: gender-Sensitive Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, N., 2011. A right to care? Unpaid care work in European employment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, N. and James, G., 2011. Introduction. In: N. Busby and G. James, eds. Families, care-giving and paid work: challenging labour law in the 21st century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo Di Torella, E., 2015. Men in the work/family reconciliation discourse: the swallows that did not make a summer. Journal of social welfare and family law, 37, 334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care, M.F., 2016. Shared parental leave: where are we now?. My Family Care. Available from https://www.myfamilycare.co.uk/resources/white-papers/shared-parental-leave-where-are-we-now/
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, J., 1999. Feminism and labour law: contesting the Terrain. In: A. Morris and T. O’Donnell, eds. Feminist perspectives on employment law. London: Cavendish, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, G.B., LØken, K.V., and Mogstad, M., 2014. Peer effects in program participation. American economic review, 104, 2049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2012. Consultation on modern workplaces: flexible parental leave, flexible working, working time regulations, equal pay. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2012. Modern workplaces consultation: government response to flexible parental leave proposals. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2016. Pregnancy and maternity-related discrimination and disadvantage: summary of key findings. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Culture, Media & Sport, 2014. Secondary analysis of the gender pay gap changes in the gender pay gap over time. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Dermott, E., 2008. Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, C., William Elming, M., and Joyce, R., 2016. The gender wage gap: IFS briefing note BN186. The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available from https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/bns/bn186.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duvander, A.-Z. and Haas, L., 2018. Sweden. In: S. Blum, et al., eds.. 14th international review of leave policies and related research 2018. International Network on Leave Policies and Research, 401. Available from https://www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/user_upload/k_leavenetwork/annual_reviews/Leave_Review_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., 2002. Contact – over the limit. Family law, 32, 426.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, M., 2010. The supportive state: families, government and america’s political ideals. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eillison, G., Barker, A., and Kulasuriya, T., 2009. Work and care: a study of modern parents. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G., 2002. Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. Gender pay gap statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics. [Accessed 08 August 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M.A., 1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M.A., 2004. The autonomy Myth: a theory of dependency. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M.A., 2013. The Sexual Family. In: M.A. Fineman, J.E. Jackson, and A.P. Romero, eds.. Feminist and queer legal theory: intimate encounters, uncomfortable conversations. Abingdon: Ashgate, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S., 1997. Women and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S., 2014. Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame. International journal of law in context, 10, 442.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 2010. Judging Civil Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. and Robeyns, I., 2011. Equality-promoting parental leave. Journal of social philosophy, 42, 173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C., 1982. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M.K., 2008. Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Politics and Society, 36, 313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Short, S., 2011. Building a house upon sand: post-separation parenting, shared residence and equality - lessons from Sweden. Child and family law quarterly, 23, 344.
   Google Scholar
• Hattery, A., 2001. Women, work and family: balancing and weaving. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Treasury, 2016. Autumn Statement 2016. London: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Treasury and The Rt Hon George Osborne 2015. Chancellor announces major new extension of shared parental leave and pay to working grandparents. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chancellor-announces-major-new-extension-of-shared-parental-leave-and-pay-to-working-grandparents. [accessed 18 April 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J., 2013. Caring and the Law. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P., 1994. Shifting the centre: race, class, and feminist theorising about motherhood. In: E.N. Glenn, G. Chang, and L.R. Forcey, eds.. Mothering: ideology Experience and Agency. Abingdon: Routledge, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R., 2011. Care-giving and reasonable adjustment in the UK. In: N. Busby and G. James, eds.. Families, care-giving and paid work: challenging labour law in the 21st century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 137.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee. 2018. Fathers and the workplace first report of session 2017–19. HC 358
   Google Scholar
• James, G., 2003. All that glitters is not gold: labour’s latest family-friendly offerings. Web journal of current legal issues, 3.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., 2006. The work and families act 2006: legislating to improve choice and flexibility? Industrial law journal, 35, 272.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., 2009. Mothers and fathers as parents and workers: family-friendly employment policies in an Era of shifting identities. Journal of social welfare and family law, 31, 271.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., 2016. Family-friendly employment law (re)assessed: the potential of care ethics. Industrial law journal, 45, 477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.P. and Barker, M., 2016. Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public health, 136, 109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., 2009. Work family balance, gender and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R., 1994. Dilemmas in engendering citizenship. paper presented at crossing borders conference, university of Stockholm. Quoted in Clare Ungerson 1997 social politics and the commodification of care. Social politics, 4, 362.
   Google Scholar
• Lyonette, C., Baldauf, B., and Behle, H., 2010. ‘Quality’ part-time work: a review of the evidence. London: Government Equalities Office.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, A., 1994. On the outside looking in: foreign domestic workers in Canada. In: W. Giles and S. Arat-Koc, eds.. Maid in the market: women’s paid domestic labor. Toronto: Fernwood Publishing, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, S., 2011. Reconciling employment and family care-giving: a gender analysis of current challenges and future directions for UK policy. In: N. Busby and G. James, eds.. Families, care-giving and paid work: challenging labour law in the 21st century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Masselot, A., 2015. Gender implications of the right to request flexible working arrangements: raising pigs and children in New Zealand. New Zealand journal of employment relations, 39, 59.
   Google Scholar
• McCandless, J. and Sheldon, S., 2010. The human fertilisation and embryology act (2008) and the tenacity of the sexual family form. Modern law review, 73, 175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern, P., et al., 2006. Postpartum health of employed mothers 5 weeks after childbirth. Annals of family medicine, 4, 159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, C.A., 1983. Feminism, marxism, method and the state: toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8, 635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. and O’Donnell, T., eds, 1999. Feminist perspectives on employment law. London: Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, N., 2002. Starting at home: caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2017. Statistical bulletin: families and household: 2017. Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2018a. Statistical bulletin: gender pay gap in the UK: 2018. Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2018b. Understanding the gender pay gap in the UK. Office for National Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A., et al., 2013. British social attitudes 30. London: NatCen Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Polikoff, N., 2000. Why lesbians and gay men should read Martha Fineman. The American University journal of gender, social policy & the law, 8, 167.
   Google Scholar
• Rittich, K., 2006. Rights, risk and reward: governance norms in the international order and the problem of precarious work. In: J. Fudge and R. Owens, eds.. Precarious work, women and the new economy: the challenge to legal norms. Hart: Oxford, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Schacher, S., Auerbach, C., and Silverstein, L.B., 2005. Gay fathers expanding the possibilities for us all. Journal of LGBT family studies, 1, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenhuijsen, S., 2003. The place of care: the relevance of the feminist Ethic of care for social policy. Feminist theory, 4, 179.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M., 1996. Rozzie and Harriett?: gender and family patterns of lesbian coparents. Gender and Society, 10, 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., et al., 2017. Good work: the taylor review of modern working practices. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Available from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/627671/good-work-taylor-review-modern-working-practices-rg.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weldon-Johns, M., 2011. The additional paternity leave regulations 2010: a new dawn or more ‘sound-bite’ legislation. Journal of social welfare and family law, 33, 25.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.C., 2000. Unbending gender: why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar