Lost in space? the role of place in the delivery of social welfare law advice over the telephone and face-to-face

References

• Alfieri, A.V., 1991. Reconstructive poverty law practice: learning lessons of client narrative. The yale law journal, 100 (7), 2107–2147. doi:10.2307/796817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, N., 2013. English and welsh civil and social justice panel survey: wave 2. London: Legal Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, N.J., et al., 2012. Just a phone call away: is telephone advice enough? Journal of social welfare and family law, 34 (1), 63–85. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.675465.
   Google Scholar
• Bankowski, Z. and Mungham, G., 1976. Images of law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N., 2003. From ‘What?’ to ‘So What?’: law and geography in retrospect. In: C. Harrison and J. Holder, eds. Law and geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L.J., 2016. Civil courts structure review: final report, Judiciary of England and Wales. Available from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/civil-courts-structure-review-final-report-jul-16-final-1.pdf. [Accessed 22 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Buck, A., et al., 2010. Piecing it together: exploring one-stop shop legal service delivery in community legal advice centres. London: Legal Services Commission, Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, A., Pleasence, P., and Balmer, N., 2008. Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? some empirical insights. Journal of social policy, 37 (4), 661–681. doi:10.1017/S0047279408002262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M., 2015 Calling for justice: comparing telephone and face-to-face advice in social welfare legal aid. Thesis (PhD). UK: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., 2018. Justice on the line? A comparison of telephone and face-to-face advice in social welfare legal aid. Journal of social welfare and family law, 40 (2), 195–215. doi:10.1080/09649069.2018.1444444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office and Government Digital Service, 2017. Government transformation strategy. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-transformation-strategy-2017-to-2020/government-transformation-strategy. [Accessed 21 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Calmore, J.O., 1999. A call to context: the professional challenges of cause lawyering at the intersection of race, space, and poverty. Fordham law review, 67, 1927–1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., 1992. The inner cities: law centres and legal services. , Journal of Law and Society 19 (1), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K.C., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Church, T.W., et al., 1978. Justice delayed: the pace of litigation in urban trial courts. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Church, T.W., 1985. Examining local legal culture. ABF research journal, 10 (3), 449–510.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., 2004. Place: a short introduction. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D., 1993. Geographies of judgment: the doctrine of changed conditions and the geopolitics of race. Annals of the association of american geographers, 83 (1), 48–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01922.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disability Charities Consortium, 2011. Proposals for the reform of legal aid in England and Wales (Ministry of Justice): statement from the disability charities consortium. London: Disability Charities Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M., and Beinart, S., 2000. Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U., 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M., 1974. Why the ‘Haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & society review, 9 (1), 95–160. doi:10.2307/3053023.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M., 1984. Worlds of deals: using negotiation to teach about legal process. Journal of legal education, 34, 268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanter, M., 2006. A world without trials. Journal of dispute resolution, 2006 (1), 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 1987. Hard bargaining: out of court settlement in personal injury actions. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 1999. Paths to justice: what people do and think about going to law. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Genn, H., 2009. Judging civil justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, J. and Hook, B., 2002. The tyranny of distance: clinical legal education in the bush. International journal of clinical legal education, 2, 64–84. doi:10.19164/ijcle.v2i0.124
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goriely, T., 1996. Law for the poor: the relationship between advice agencies and solicitors in the development of poverty law. International journal of the legal profession, 3 (1–2), 215–248. doi:10.1080/09695958.1996.9960414.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, D.J., Pattanayak, C.W., and Hennessy, J., 2013. The limits of unbundled legal assistance: a randomized study in a Massachusetts district court and prospects for the future. Harvard law review, 126 (4), 903–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., 1992. Pressure through law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HM Revenue and Customs, 2013. Home visits for customers who need extra help. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-visits-for-customers-who-need-extra-help. [Accessed 21 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Hosticka, C.J., 1979. We don’t care about what happened, we only care about what is going to happen: lawyer-client negotiations of reality. Social problems, 26 (5), 599–610. doi:10.2307/800044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice Committee, 2015. Impact of changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of the legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders Act 2012 HC (2014-5) 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kenrick, J., 2009. Young people’s access to advice - the evidence. Key research evidence on young people’s access to advice on social welfare issues. London: Youth Access.
   Google Scholar
• Kritzer, H.M. and Zemans, F.K., 1993. Local legal culture and the control of litigation. Law & society review, 27 (3), 535–557. doi:10.2307/3054104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, M.S., 1977. The rise of professionalism: a sociological analysis. Berkeley; London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law Society, 2019. End legal aid deserts. Available from: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/policy-campaigns/campaigns/access-to-justice/end-legal-aid-deserts/. [Accessed 21 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Legal Aid Agency, 2014. Legal aid statistics in England and Wales 2013–2014. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Aid Board, 1992. Franchising: the next steps. London: Legal Aid Board.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Services Commission, 2004. Improving access to advice in the community legal service: report on evaluation research on alternative methods of delivery. London: Legal Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Low Commission, 2014. Tackling the advice deficit: A strategy for access to advice and legal support on social welfare law in England and Wales. London: LAG Education and Service Trust Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Low Commission, 2015. Getting it right in social welfare law: the low commission’s follow-up report. London: LAG Education and Service Trust Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K.M., 1995. The sociology of the professions. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D.B., 1994. A global sense of place. In: D.B. Massey, ed. Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity 166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D.B. and McDowell, L., 1994. A woman’s place? In: D.B. Massey, ed. Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity 214–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, M., et al., 2014. Access to justice for disadvantaged communities. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mind & Rethink, 2011. Proposals for the reform of legal aid in England and Wales: response from Mind And Rethink. London: Mind & Rethink.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2010. Proposals for the reform of legal aid in England and Wales. Consultation Paper CP12/10. Cm 7967. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2019. Post-implementation review of Part 1 of the legal aid, sentencing and punishment of offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) CP37. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R., et al., 2001. Quality and cost: final report on the contracting of civil, non-family advice and assistance pilot. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R. and Robinson, M., 2006. A trouble shared - legal problems clusters in solicitors’ and advice agencies. London: Department of Constitutional Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, A., Balmer, N., and Smith, M., 2014. Geographical barriers to education law advice: access, communications and public legal services in England and Wales. The geographical journal, 180 (3), 211–223. doi:10.1111/geoj.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A. and Mottram, C., 2014. Civil legal advice mandatory gateway: overarching research summary. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, A. and Smith, M., 2013a. A quantitative comparison of telephone and face-to-face specialist community legal service funded debt cases. Ministry of Justice. London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, A. and Smith, M., 2013b. Provision of telephone-based advice services: summary of findings on the perspective of advisors. Ministry of Justice. London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., et al., 2004. Causes of action: civil law and social justice: the final report of the first LSRC survey of justiciable problems. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., 2006. Causes of action: civil law and social justice: incorporating findings from the 2004 English and Welsh civil and social justice survey. 2nd ed. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., et al., 2010. Civil justice in England and Wales 2009: report of the 2006–9 English and Welsh civil and social justice survey. London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N., 2014. How people resolve ‘Legal Problems’. Cambridge: PPSR.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J., 2007. Changing fortunes: results from randomized trial of the offer of debt advice in England and Wales. Journal of empirical legal studies, 4 (3), 651–674. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00102.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, P. and Sommerlad, H., 2002. Exploring the limits to the standardization of the expert knowledge of lawyers: quality and legal aid reforms in the United Kingdom. Syracuse law review, 52 (4), 987–1016.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A., 1990. The law is all over: power, resistance and the legal consciousness of the welfare poor. Yale journal of law & the humanities, 2, 343–379.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W.L.F., 1986. Law and strategy in the divorce lawyer’s office. Law & society review, 20 (1), 93–134. doi:10.2307/3053414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherr, A., Moorhead, R., and Paterson, A., 1994. Assessing the quality of legal work: measuring process. International journal of the legal profession, 1 (2), 135–158. doi:10.1080/09695958.1994.9960372.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., et al., 2013. In scope but out of reach? examining differences between publicly funded telephone and face-to-face family law advice. Child and family law quarterly, 25 (3), 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., 1992. A strategy for justice: publicly funded legal services in the 1990s. London: Legal Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., 1997. Justice: redressing the balance. London: Legal Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, M., 1993. Community law centres: problems and proposals. Journal of social policy, 22 (1), 49–68. doi:10.1017/S0047279400019103.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R. and Susskind, D., 2015. The future of the professions: how technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford, United Kingdom: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, R.E., 2008. The end of lawyers?: rethinking the nature of legal services. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, L.E., 1990. Subordination, rhetorical survival skills, and sunday shoes: notes on the hearing of Mrs. G. Buffalo law review, 38, 1–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander, M., 1968. Lawyers and the public interest: a study of restrictive practices. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, M., 1978. Legal services for the community. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar