761
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mothers of children removed under a care order: outcomes and experiences

&

References

  • Bainham, A., 1998. Children: the modern law. Bristol: Family Law.
  • Bainham, A., 2007. Permanence for children: special Guardianship or adoption? The Cambridge law journal, 66 (3), 520–523. doi:10.1017/S0008197307000906
  • Bar-On, D., 2004. A socially and historically contextualised psychoanalytic perspective: holocaust survival and suffering chapter 7. In: P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, and U. Apitzch, eds.. Biographical methods and professional practice. an international perspective. (pp. 101–114) Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Booth, T., Booth, W., and Mc Connell, D., 2005. The prevalence and outcomes of care proceedings involving parents with learning difficulties in the family courts. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 18 (1), 7–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00204.x
  • Bowlby, J. (1988) A Secure Base:Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London. Routledge Classics edition 2005.
  • Bowlby, J., 2005. A secure base. London: Routledge.
  • Broadhurst, K. and Mason, C., 2017. Birth parents and court-ordered child removal: towards a comprehensive framework. International journal of law, policy and the family, 31 (1), 41–59. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebw013
  • Callaghan, J.E.M., et al., 2015. Beyond ‘witnessing’: children’s experiences of coercive control in domestic violence and abuse. Journal of interpersonal violence, 33 (10), 1551–1581. doi:10.1177/0886260515618946
  • Children Act 1989. http://www.legislation.gov.uk
  • Clarke, S. and Hoggett, P. eds, 2009. Researching beneath the surface: psycho-social methods in practice. London: Karnac Books ltd.
  • Cleaver, H., Unell, I., and Aldgate, J., 1999. Children’s needs-parenting capacity. The impact of parental mental illness, problem alcohol and drug use, and domestic violence on children’s development. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Cox, P., et al., 2017. Reducing recurrent care proceedings: initial evidence from new interventions. Journal of social welfare and family law, 39 (3), 332–349. doi:10.1080/09649069.2017.1345083
  • Curtis, M. (1946) Report of the Care of Children Committee. 1946 Cmnd 6922. London. HMSO.
  • Department for Education. 2017. The impact of abuse and neglect on children; and comparison of different placement options: evidence review. March. Available from: www.gov.uk/government/publications.
  • Elizabeth, V., 2019. ‘It’s an invisible wound’: the disenfranchised grief of post-separation mothers who lose care time. Journal of social welfare and family law, 41 (1), 34–52. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2019.1554788
  • Eronen, T., 2012. Three stories about mother: narratives by women who have lived in care. Child and family social work, 17 (1), 66–74. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00773.x
  • Fahlberg, V., 1991. A child’s journey through placement. London: BAAF.
  • Family Justice Council 2019 Family justice council: interim guidance on special guardianship, 24 May. Available from: www.judiciary.uk.
  • Featherstone, B., et al., 2018. Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: towards a social model of ‘child protection’. Families, relationships and societies, 7 (1), 7–22. doi:10.1332/204674316X14552878034622
  • Ferguson, D. (2019) Thirty years on, has the Children Act changed family life for the better? The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/society/nov13/children-act-changed-family-life-children-better
  • Freeman, M.D.A. (1992) Children, their families and the law. London. Macmillan.
  • Frosh, S., 2010. Psychoanalysis outside the clinic: interventions in psychosocial studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hall, A., 2008. Special Guardianship and permanency planning: unforeseen consequences and missed opportunities. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 20, 359–377.
  • Harwin, J., et al., 2018. Child and parent outcomes in the london family drug and alcohol court five years on: building on international evidence. International journal of law, policy and the family, 32 (2), 140–169. doi:10.1093/lawfam/eby006
  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T., 2013. Doing qualitative research differently: a psychosocial approach. 2nd ed. London. Sage.
  • Higgins, M. (2019) The Judgement in Re W (Child): National and International Implications for Contemporary Child and Family Social Work British Journal of Social Work 49, 44–58.
  • Holland, S. and Crowley, A., 2013. Looked-after children and their birth families: using sociology to explore changing relationships, hidden histories and nomadic childhood in. Child and family social work, 18 (1), 57–66. doi:10.1111/cfs.12032
  • Hollway, W., 2006. The capacity to care. Gender and ethical subjectivity. London: Routledge.
  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T., 2013. Doing qualitative research differently: a psychosocial approach. 2nd ed. London. Sage.
  • Howe, D., 2005. Child abuse and neglect: attachment, development and intervention. London: Blackwell.
  • Jervis, S., 2009. The use of self as a research tool chapter seven. In: S. Clarke and P. Hoggett, eds.. Researching beneath the surface: psycho-social methods in practice. (pp. 145–166) London: Karnac Books Ltd.
  • Kenny, K.S., Barrington, C., and Green, S.L., 2015. ‘I felt for a long time like everything beautiful in me had been taken out: women’s suffering, remembering, and survival following the loss of child custody. International journal of drug policy, 26 (11), 1158–1166. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.024
  • Klein, M. (1981). Love, Guilt and Reparation and other Works 1921-1945. London. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis.
  • Langeland, W. and Dijkstra, S., 1995. Breaking the intergenerational transmission of child abuse: beyond the mother-child relationship. Child Abuse Review, 4, 4–13.
  • Minsky, R., 1998. Psychoanalysis and culture: contemporary states of mind. London: Wiley.
  • Munro, E.R. and Ward, H., 2008. Balancing parents’ and very young children’s rights in care proceedings: decision-making in the context of the Human Rights Act 1998. Child and family social work, 13 (2), 227–234. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00542.x
  • Nixon, K.L., Radtke, H.L., and Tutty, L.M., 2013. “Everyday it takes a piece of you away” Experiences of grief and loss among abused mothers involved with child protection services. Journal of public child welfare, 7 (2), 172–193. doi:10.1080/15548732.2012.715268
  • Oakley, A., 1981. Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In: H. Roberts, ed. Doing feminist research. (pp. 30–61) London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Radford, L. and Hester, M., 2006. Mothering through domestic violence. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Richardson, V., 2015. Whose expectations? Care orders: towards a relational harm approach in the test of reasonable parental care. Journal of social welfare and family law, 37 (2), 194–208. doi:10.1080/09649069.2015.1028154
  • Richardson, V., Boylan, J., and Brammer, A., 2017. Contact, welfare and children in care: revisiting the significance of birth family relationships after finding significant harm. Journal of social welfare and family law, 39 (1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/09649069.2016.1275124
  • Rutter, M., 1993. Developing minds: challenge and continuity across the life span. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Rutter, M., 2000. Children in substitute care: some conceptual considerations and research implications. Children and youth services review, 22 (9–10), 685–703. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(00)00116-X
  • Schofield, G., et al., 2011. Managing loss and a threatened identity: experiences of parents of children growing up in foster care, the perspectives of their social workers and implications for practice. British journal of social work, 41 (1), 74–92. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq073
  • Stanley, L. and Wise, S., 1993. Breaking out again. Feminist ontology and epistemology. New edition. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Wengraf, T., 2001. Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.
  • West, R., 1997. Caring for Justice. New York and London: New York University Press.
  • Widom, C.S., Czaja, S.J., and Du Mont, K.A., 2015. Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect: real or detection bias? Science, 347 (6229), 1480–1485. doi:10.1126/science.1259917

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.