Mothers’ understandings of ‘home’ after relationship separation and divorce

References

• Anderson, K.L., 2009. Gendering coercive control. Violence against women, 15 (12), 1444–1457. doi:10.1177/1077801209346837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2017. Characteristics of employment. Cat. No. 6333.0. Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/6333.0Main+Features1August%202017?OpenDocument.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Family Studies, 2019. Parenting arrangements after separation. Research summary. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/parenting-arrangements-after-separation
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, A. and Dowling, R., 2006. Home. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, J. and Boyle, M., 2004. Home ownership, mortgages and psychological distress. Housing studies, 19 (2), 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo, M., 2015. Children’s exposure to domestic and family violence. Child Family Community Australia Paper No. 36, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Campo, M., et al., 2012. Shared parenting time in Australia: exploring children’s views. Journal of social welfare & family law, 34 (3), 295–313. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.750480
   Google Scholar
• Campo, M., et al., 2020 forthcoming. The meaning of home for children and young people after separation. Journal of social welfare & family law, 42 (3), 299–318. 10.1080/09649069.2020.1796218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R., et al., 2018. Children and young people in separated families: family law system experiences and needs. Final Report, Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Cristoforetti, A., Gennai, F., and Rodeschini, G., 2011. Home sweet home: the emotional construction of places. Journal of aging studies, 25 (3), 225–232. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crown Prosecution Service, United Kingdom, Domestic abuse. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/domestic-abuse.
   Google Scholar
• David, G., et al., 2018. Health benefits of going on-country. Melbourne: The Lowitja Institute. Available from: https://www.lowitja.org.au/content/Document/Lowitja-Publishing/Lowitja_Inst_Health_Benefits_OnCountry__report__WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., 2006. A culture of disrespect: indigenous peoples and Australian public institutions. University of technology Sydney law review, 8, 135–152.
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D., et al., 2014. The economic consequences of divorce in Australia. International journal of law, policy, and the family, 28 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domestic Abuse Bill (HC Bill 96), Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0096/cbill_2019-20210096_en_2.htm#pt1-l1g1.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, A. and Thorns, D., 1998. Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociological review, 46 (1), 24–47. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., 2017. Custody stalking: a mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist legal studies, 25, 185–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B., Millward, C., and Campo, M., 2009. Shared post-separation parenting in 2009: an empirical snapshot. Australian journal of family law, 23 (3), 247–271.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L., 2006. Conceptualising home: theories, laws and policies. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1993. The transformation of intimacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, C., 1997. … Half of me was satisfied”: making sense of home through episodic ethnographies. Women’s studies international forum, 20 (3), 373–386. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiscock, R., et al., 2001. Ontological security and psycho-social benefits from the home: qualitative evidence on issues of tenure. Housing, theory and society, 18 (1–2), 50–66. doi:10.1080/14036090120617
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, C., 2013. Family and intimate mobilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, L., Kaspiew, R., and Taft, A., 2016. Domestic and family violence and parenting: mixed methods insights into impact and support needs: state of knowledge paper. Sydney: ANROWS.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., 2013. Home talk: girls talking about family togetherness. Home cultures, 10 (3), 315–328. doi:10.2752/175174213X13739735973462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., et al., 2015. Evaluation of the 2012 family violence amendments: synthesis report. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Melbourne, Australia.6
   Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., et al., 2017. Domestic and family violence and parenting: mixed methods insights into impact and support needs: final report. Australian National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Leith, K., 2006. “Home is where the heart is … or is it?” a phenomenological exploration of the meaning of home for older women in congregate housing. Journal of aging studies, 20 (4), 317–333. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallett, S., 2004. Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. Sociological review, 52, 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., 1989. Reconstructing the public and the private: the home and marriage in later life. In: G. Allan and G. Crow, eds.. Home and family: creating the domestic sphere. (pp. 102–121). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Hampshire, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S.L. and Smolter, N.L., 2011. “Paper abuse”: when all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence against women, 17 (5), 637–650. doi:10.1177/1077801211407290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D., 2011. Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Natalier, K., 2018. State facilitated economic abuse: a structural analysis of men deliberately withholding child support. Feminist legal studies, 26 (2), 121–140. doi:10.1007/s10691-018-9376-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalier, K. and Fehlberg, B., 2015. Children’s experiences of ‘home’ and ‘homemaking’ after parents separate: a new conceptual frame for listening and supporting adjustment. Australian journal of family law, 29, 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B., 2004. Parent-child contact and post-separation parenting arrangements (Research report no. 9). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Towes, M.L. and Bermea, A.M., 2017. “I was naive in thinking,‘I divorced this man, he is out of my life’”: a qualitative exploration of post-separation power and control tactics experienced by women. Journal of interpersonal violence, 32 (14), 2166–2189. doi:10.1177/0886260515591278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardaugh, J., 1999. The unaccommodated woman: home, homelessness and identity. Sociological review, 47 (1), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar