The barriers to effective access to justice encountered by litigants in person in private family matters post-LASPO

References

• Amnesty International, 2016. Cuts that hurt: the impact of legal aid cuts in England on access to justice. London: Amnesty International.
   Google Scholar
• Bach Commission, 2017. The right to justice. London: Fabian Society.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, A., et al., 2017. Mapping paths to family justice: resolving family disputes in neo-liberal times. Palgrave Macmillan London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, A., et al., 2014. Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) and mediation in private family law disputes: qualitative research findings. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. London.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, L.J., 2016. Civil courts structure review: final report. Judiciary of England and Wales. London.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE. London.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Justice Council, 2011. Access to Justice for litigants in person (or self-represented litigants). A report and series of recommendations to the Lord Chancellor and to the Lord Chief Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, S., 2013. Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 3. doi:10.1080/09649069.2013.774607
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, April 2019. The role and responsibilities of the Designated Family Judge.
   Google Scholar
• Danvir, C., 2016. Online and in the know: public legal education, young people and the internet. Computers and Education, 92–93, 204. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danvir, C., 2018. Assisted digital support for civil justice system users demand, design and implementation final research report. UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Dewar, J. et al., 2000. Litigants in person in the Family Court of Australia: A report to the Family Court of Australia. Family Court of Australia, Research Report No. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., 1957. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction. London.
   Google Scholar
• Greiner, D.J., et al., 2013. The Limits of Unbundled Legal Assistance: A Randomized Study in a Massachusetts District Court and Prospects for the Future. Harvard Law Review, 126, 903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government, 2019. Transforming the response to domestic abuse consultation response and draft bill, CP 15.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 2015. Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship: statutory guidance framework. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Justice Committee, 2014. Impact of changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, (Eighth Report) (2014–15, HC 311).
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Justice Committee, 2019. Oral evidence: Court and tribunal reforms, (HC 1886).
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute, 2015. Qualitative research exploring experiences and perceptions of unbundled legal services. Legal Services Board and Legal Services Consumer Panel.
   Google Scholar
• JUSTICE, 2014. Delivering justice in an age of austerity. London: JUSTICE.
   Google Scholar
• JUSTICE, 2018. Preventing digital exclusion from online justice. London: JUSTICE.
   Google Scholar
• Law for Life, 2014. Meeting the information needs of litigants in person, Law for Life’s Advicenow project.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. and Tkacukova, T., 2017. A study of litigants in person in Birmingham Civil Justice Centre, CEPLR Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Services Consumer Panel, 2017. Tracker survey 2017 briefing note: how consumers are using legal services.
   Google Scholar
• Liberty, 2013. Liberty’s response to the Ministry of Justice Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M. and Eekelaar, J., 2016. Lawyers and mediators: the brave new world of services for separating families. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane Andrew, 2020. Covid 19: National Guidance for the Family Court 19th March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2010. Proposals for the reform of legal aid in England and Wales, Cm 7967.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2011. Reform of legal aid in England and Wales: the government response, CM 8072.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2014. Legal Aid Statistics in England and Wales July to September 2014. Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2016. Transforming our justice system. Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice and the Senior President of Tribunals.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2017. Alleged perpetrators of abuse as Litigants in person in private family law: the cross-examination of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. MOJ Analytical Series.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2018a. Post implementation review evidence gathering exercise: terms of Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2018b. Family court statistics quarterly, England and Wales (January to March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2019a. Post-implementation review of part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), CP 37.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2019b. Legal support: the way ahead an action plan to deliver better support to people experiencing legal problems, CP 40.
   Google Scholar
• Moorhead, R. and Sefton, M., 2005. Litigants in person: unrepresented litigants in first instance proceedings, DCA Research Series 2/05.
   Google Scholar
• Mosten, F.S., 1995. Unbundling legal services and the family lawyer. Family Law Quarterly, 28, 421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office, 2014. Implementing reforms to civil legal aid, 2014–15 HC 784.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Family Justice Observatory, 2020. Remote hearings in the family justice system: a rapid consultation.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2011 census. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census [Accessed 13 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2019. Exploring the UK’s digital divide. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/articles/exploringtheuksdigitaldivide/2019-03-04 [Accessed 4 October 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Personal Support Unit, 2018. Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J., 2014. How people resolve legal problems. Legal Services Board. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J., 2019. Justice & the Capability to Function in Society. Dædalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 148 (1), 140.
   Google Scholar
• Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts), 12 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rights of Women, 2015. Evidencing domestic violence nearly 3 years on.
   Google Scholar
• Solicitors Regulation Authority, 2017. Improving access - tackling unmet legal needs Risk Outlook update.
   Google Scholar
• Speak up for Justice, 2016. Justice denied: Impacts of government reforms to legal aid and court services on access to justice TUC.
   Google Scholar
• The Bar Council, 2018. The Bar Council direct access portal. Available from: www.directaccessportal.co.uk/ [Accessed 24 September 2018].
   Google Scholar
• The Law Society, 4 April 2016. Unbundling civil legal services. Available from: http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/advice/practice-notes/unbundling-civil-legal-services/ [Accessed 20 September 2018].
   Google Scholar
• The Law Society, 2019. Technology, access to justice and the rule of law is technology the key to unlocking access to justice innovation?
   Google Scholar
• The Low Commission, 2014. Tackling the advice deficit: A strategy for access to advice and legal support on social welfare law in England and Wales. Legal Action Group.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J. and Walker, L., 1978. A Theory of Procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541. doi:10.2307/3480099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., 2016. The “Lottery” of Justice: exploring some of the consequences of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, CEPLR Working Paper Series 03/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toynbee Hall, 2015. Sleepless nights: accessing justice without legal aid. London. Middlesex University.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. et al., 2014. Litigants in person in private family law cases, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, L., 1995. Access to justice: interim report to the Lord Chancellor on the civil justice system in England & Wales. London: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, A., 2014. No Justice Without Lawyers—The Myth of an Inquisitorial Solution. Civil Justice Quarterly, 33 (4), 355.
   Google Scholar