The degendering of male perpetrated intimate partner violence against female partners in Ontario family law courts

References

• Abraham, M. and Tastsoglou, E., 2016. Addressing domestic violence in Canada and the United States: the uneasy co-habitation of women and the state. Current sociology monograph, 64 (4), 568–585. doi:10.1177/0011392116639221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, M., Breton, M., and Brousselle, A., 2018. Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: a scoping review. PLOS one, 13 (2), 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns, N., 2001. Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: political discourse on women and violence. Gender & society, 15 (2), 262–281. doi:10.1177/089124301015002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billoux, S., et al., 2016. Autobiographical memory impairment in female victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of family violence, 31, 897–902. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9838-7
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, H.J., et al., 2008. A judicial guide to child safety in custody cases. Reno: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, S.B. and Lindy, R., 2016. Violence against women and the B. C. family law act: early jurisprudence. Canadian family law quarterly, 35 (2), 101–138.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E.L., 1996. The scholarship of engagement. Journal of public service and outreach, 1 (1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Breiding, M.J., et al., 2014. Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization – National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess v Kilby, 2019. O. J. 3129.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.C. and Lewandowski, L.A., 1997. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatric clinics of North America, 20 (2), 353–374. doi:10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70317-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Divorce Act, R. S. C., 1985. c. 3 (2nd Supp.). Available from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/d-3.4/ [Accessed 1 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, n.d. Carnegie community engagement classification. Available from: https://compact.org/initiatives/carnegie-community-engagement-classification/ [Accessed 1 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Children’s Law Reform Act, R. S. O., 1990. (c. C.12). Available from: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c12 [Accessed 1 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P.M., Jr., Manning, K.L., and Carp, R.A., 2010. Gender, critical mass, and judicial decision making. Law & policy, 32 (2), 260–281. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, P., 2016. When shared parenting and the safety of women and children collide. Oshawa: Luke’s Place.
   Google Scholar
• D. G. v A. D, 2019. O. J. 1496.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice, 2013. Making the links in family violence cases: collaboration among the family, child protection and criminal justice systems. Report on the Federal-Provincial-Territorial (FPT) Ad Hoc Working Group on Family Violence. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, J., Maxwell, N., and Slater, T., 2020. Professional responses to ‘parental alienation’: research-informed practice. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 68–79. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragiewicz, M. and DeKeseredy, W.S., 2008. Study on the experiences of abused women in the family courts in eight regions in Ontario: research report. Oshawa: Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre for Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Elizabeth, V., 2017. Custody stalking: a mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist legal studies, 25, 185–201. doi:10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feresin, M., 2020. Parental alienation (syndrome) in child custody cases: survivor’s experiences and the logic of psychosocial and legal services in Italy. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 56–67. doi:10.1080/09649069.2019.1701924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fix, M.F. and Johnson, G.E., 2017. Public perceptions of gender bias in the decisions of female state court judges. Vanderbilt law review, 70 (6), 1845–1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury-Steiner, R.E., et al., 2016. “No contact, except … ”: visitation decisions in protection orders for intimate partner abuse. Feminist criminology, 11 (1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/1557085114554259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, V. and McManimon, P., 2011. Gendered justice: intimate partner violence and the criminal justice system. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon da Cruz, C., 2017. Critical community-engaged scholarship: communities and universities striving for racial justice. Peabody journal of education, 92 (3), 363–384. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2017.1324661
   Google Scholar
• Guetterman, T., et al., 2018. Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: a systematic review. American behavioral scientist, 62 (7), 900–918. doi:10.1177/0002764218772641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupton, J.T., Sullivan, A.L., and Johnston-Goodstar, K., 2014. The role of university engagement in the community. International journal of educational reform, 23 (3), 181–190. doi:10.1177/105678791402300302
   Google Scholar
• Gutowski, E. and Goodman, L.A., 2020. ‘Like I’m invisible’: IPV survivor-mothers’ perceptions of seeking child custody through the family court system. Journal of family violence, 35, 441–457. doi:10.1007/s10896-019-00063-1
   Google Scholar
• Hardesty, J.L., et al., 2008. Coparenting relationships after divorce: variations by type of marital violence and fathers’ role differentiation. Family relations: An interdisciplinary journal of applied family studies, 57 (4), 479–491. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00516.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., 2008. Implacably hostile or appropriately protective? Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence against women, 14 (4), 381–405. doi:10.1177/1077801208314833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, S., 2015. Post-separation fathering and domestic abuse: challenges and contradictions. Child abuse review, 24 (3), 210–222. doi:10.1002/car.2264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. and Chau, S., 2012. Children’s best interests and intimate partner violence in the Canadian family law and child protection systems. Critical social policy, 32 (4), 677–695. doi:10.1177/0261018311435025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P.G., et al., 2008. Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family court review, 46 (3), 500–522. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, P.G., Crooks, C.V., and Wolfe, D.A., 2003. Legal and policy responses to children exposed to domestic violence: the need to evaluate intended and unintended consequences. Clinical child and family psychology review, 6 (3), 205–213. doi:10.1023/A:1024914517072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Ollus, N., and Nevala, S., 2008. The prevalence and severity of violence against women. In: H. Johnson, N. Ollus, and S. Nevala, eds. Violence against women: an international perspective. New York: Springer, 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J.R. and Steegh, N.V., 2013. Historical trends in family court response to intimate partner violence: perspectives of critics and proponents of current practices. Family court review, 51 (1), 63–73. doi:10.1111/fcre.12009
   Google Scholar
• Lapierre, S., et al., 2020. The legitimization and institutionalization of ‘parental alienation’ in the province of Quebec. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 30–44. doi:10.1080/09649069.2019.1701922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke’s Place, 2020. Available from: https://lukesplace.ca [Accessed 1 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Kaplanis v. Kaplanis, Ontario Court of Appeal, (2005, O. J. No. 275).
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, L.R., 1985. Domestic violence and custody litigation: the need for statutory reform. Hofstra law review, 13 (2), 407–441.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D., Herbert, R., and Robertson, N., 2020. ‘It’s not ok’, but ‘it’ never happened: parental alienation accusations undermine children’s safety in the New Zealand family court. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 106–117. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, D. and Jackson, M., 2016. Risk of future harm: family violence and information sharing between family and criminal courts. Canadian Observatory on the Justice System’s Response to Intimate Partner Violence. FREDA Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children. Vancouver, BC. Canada
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J., 2020. U.S. child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: what do the data show? Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 92–105. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, H., et al., 2009. The mental health of children who witness domestic violence. Child & family social work, 14 (4), 491–501. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00633.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A.L., 2019. Expertise fails to attenuate gendered biases in judicial decision- making. Social psychology and personality science, 10 (2), 227–234. doi:10.1177/1948550617741181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. and Manzer, J., 2018. Safeguarding children’s well-being: voices from abused mothers navigating their relationships and civil courts. Journal of interpersonal violence, 886260518791599.
   Google Scholar
• N. P. v A. D, 2019. O. J. 2348.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, M., et al., 2011. Levels of community engagement in youth violence prevention: the role of power in sustaining successful university-community partnerships. American journal of community psychology, 48 (1), 89–96. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9414-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019. Vibrant and healthy kids: aligning science, practice, and policy to advance health equity. Washington: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L.C., 2013. Enhancing safety: when domestic violence cases are in multiple legal systems (criminal, family, child protection). A family law, domestic violence perspective. 2nd ed. New Brunswick: Family, Child and Youth Section, Department of Justice Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, L.C., 2018. Parental alienation: empirical analysis: child best interests or parental rights? Fredericton: Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research and the FREDA Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, C.S., et al., 2006. Supervised and unsupervised parental access in domestic violence cases: court orders and consequences. Brooklyn: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P., 2013. The idea of family relationship centres in Australia. Family court review, 51 (2), 195–213. doi:10.1111/fcre.12020
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, R.L., 2017. Overcoming biased views of gender and victimhood in custody evaluations when domestic violence is alleged. American university journal of gender, social policy & the law, 25 (2), 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Pryce v Pryce, 2019. O. J. 3013.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, J., Rennison, C.M., and Jones, N., 2019. Twenty-five years of research and advocacy on violence against women: what have we accomplished, and where do we go from here? A conversation. Violence against women, 25 (16), 2024–2046. doi:10.1177/1077801219875822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E., 2008. Intimate partner violence: a gender-based issue? American journal of public health, 98 (2), 197–198. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.125765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reihing, K.M., 1999. Protecting victims of domestic violence and their children after divorce: the American law institute’s model. Family conciliation courts review, 37, 393–410. doi:10.1111/j.174-1617.1999.tb01312.x
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, J., 2011. The impacts of recent law reforms on abused women involved in the family court process in Ontario: an environmental scan of violence against women service providers. Unpublished report. Oshawa: Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre for Women and Children.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnes, M., 1997. The invisibility of male violence in Canadian child custody and access decision-making. Canadian journal of family law, 14 (1), 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehy, E. and Boyd, S.B., 2020. Penalizing women’s fear: intimate partner violence and parental alienation in Canadian child custody cases. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 80–91. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1701940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehy, E. and Lapierre, S., 2020. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1702409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh v Singh, 2019. O. J. 2179.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, M.M., 2002. Witnessing domestic violence: the effect on children. American family physician, 66 (11), 2052–2067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treloar, R. and Boyd, S.B., 2014. Family law reform in (neoliberal) context: british Columbia’s new family law act. International journal of law policy and the family, 28 (1), 77–99. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utt, J. and Short, K.G., 2018. Critical content analysis: a flexible method for thinking with theory. Understanding and dismantling privilege, 8 (2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vodden v Furgoch, 2019. O. J. 736.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M.R., et al., 2018. Is collaborative, community-engaged scholarship more rigorous than traditional scholarship? On advocacy, bias, and social science research. Urban education, 53 (4), 445–472. doi:10.1177/0042085918763511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitecross, R., 2017. Section 11 orders and the “abuse” provisions: family lawyers’ experience and understanding of section 11(7A)-(7E). Edinburgh law review, 21 (2), 269–275. doi:10.3366/elr.2017.0419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, 2017. Violence against women [online]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women [Accessed 1 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Zeoli, A.M., et al., 2013. Post-separation abuse of women and their children: boundary-setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of family violence, 28 (6), 547–560. doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9528-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar