Scaling up research on family justice using large-scale administrative data: an invitation to the socio-legal community

References

• Administrative Data Taskforce, 2012. The UK administrative data research network: improving access for research and policy. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alrouh, B., et al., 2019. Born into care Wales: newborns and infants in care proceedings in Wales | nuffield foundation. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., 2008. ‘The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete’. Wired magazine, 16 (7), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Health (no date) Research data infrastructure initiative. Available at: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/research-data-infrastructure-initiative ( Accessed: 6 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, H., et al. 2019. Disentangling the effect of out-of-home care on child mental health. Child abuse & neglect, 88, 189–200. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedston, S., et al. 2019. Linked lives: gender, family relations and recurrent care proceedings in England. Children and youth services review, 105, 104392. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedston, S., et al. 2020. Data resource: children and family court advisory and support service (Cafcass) public family law administrative records in England. International Journal of Population Data Science, 5 (1). doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1159
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R.A., Sorenson, S.B., and Barnes, G., 2016. Forecasting domestic violence: a machine learning approach to help inform arraignment decisions. Journal of empirical legal studies, 13 (1), 94–115. doi:10.1111/jels.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. and Crawford, K., 2012. Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, 15 (5), 662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinig, M.F. (2002) Empirical work in family law, U. Ill. L. Rev. Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship ( Accessed: 5 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., et al. 2015. Connecting events in time to identify a hidden population: birth mothers and their children in recurrent care proceedings in England. British journal of social work, 45 (8), 2241–2260. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K. et al. (2017) Vulnerable birth mothers and recurrent care proceedings final summary report. Available at: www.nuffieldfoundation.org ( Accessed: 9 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Budd, T., and Williams, T., 2018. The nuffield family justice observatory for england and wales: making it happen. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, M.D. and Jutte, D.P., 2013. Administrative data linkage as a tool for child maltreatment research. Child abuse & neglect, 37 (2), 120–124. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., et al., 2017. Understanding the lives of separating and separated families in the UK: what evidence do we need? London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Byrom, N., 2019. Developing the detail: evaluating the impact of court reform in england and wales on access to justice. Guildford: Legal Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D., Pope, S., and Clemence, M., 2014. Dialogue on data: exploring the public’s views on using administrative data for research purposes. London: Ipsos Mori Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Campaign for Social Science (no date). Available at: https://campaignforsocialscience.org.uk/ ( Accessed: 6 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Cane, P. and Kritzer, H., 2010. The oxford handbook of empirical legal research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Card, D., et al., 2010. Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. In: American economic association, ten years and beyond: economists answer NSF’s call for long-term research agendas. pp 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P., Laurie, G.T., and Dixon-Woods, M., 2015. The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble. Journal of medical ethics, 41 (5), 404–409. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, R., et al. 2016. The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social science research, 59, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creutzfeldt, N., Mason, M., and McConnachie, K., 2019. Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cusworth, L., et al., 2019. Children looked after away from home aged five and under in Scotland: experiences, pathways and outcomes. Stirling: University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Cusworth, L., et al., 2020. Who’s coming to court? private family law applications in wales. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Cusworth, L., et al., 2021. Uncovering private family law: who’s coming to court in England? London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Data First: Harnessing the potential of linked administrative data for the justice system - ADR UK (no date). Available at: https://www.adruk.org/our-work/browse-all-projects/data-first-harnessing-the-potential-of-linked-administrative-data-for-the-justice-system-169/ ( Accessed: 28 May 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Data, U.C., 1999. An inventory of research uses of administrative data in social services programs in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Available:http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/new_web/inventory/intro.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, T., 2012. Natural experiments in the social sciences: a design-based approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M., 1990. Divorce law and empirical studies: a reply. Law quarterly review, 106, 621–631.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M., 2013. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M., and Beinart, S., 2000. Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, P., 2014. Administrative data. In: (Eds) Adrian Duşa, Dietrich Nelle, Günter Stock, and Gert G. Wagner Facing the future: european research infrastructures for the humanities and social sciences. Berlin: Scivero Verlag, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., et al. 2010. Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research. The journal of behavioral health services & research, 37 (2), 252–271. doi:10.1007/s11414-008-9125-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderjohann, J. and Roberts, C., 2018. Missing men, missing infertility: the enactment of sex/gender in surveys in low-and middle-income countries. Population horizons, 15 (2), 66–87. doi:10.1515/pophzn-2018-0003
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D.V., et al. 2009. The SAIL databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation. BMC health services research, 9 (1), 157. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genn, H.G., Wheeler, S., and Partington, M., 2006. Law in the real world: improving our understanding of how law works: final report and recommendations. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Goerge, R.M. and Lee, B.J., 2002. Matching and cleaning administrative data. New Zealand economic papers, 36 (1), 63–64. doi:10.1080/00779950209544351
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, L., et al. 2020. Maternal health, pregnancy and birth outcomes for women involved in care proceedings in Wales: a linked data study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 20 (1), 697. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03370-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grobe, D., et al. 2017. Using policy-relevant administrative data in mixed methods: a study of employment instability and parents’ use of child care subsidies. Journal of family and economic issues, 38 (1), 146–162. doi:10.1007/s10834-016-9501-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmann, A., 2019. The SPOR Canadian data platform: opportunity for multi-provincial research. Canadian medical association journal, 191 (40), e1091–e1092. doi:10.1503/cmaj.191040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafekost, K., et al. 2017. Maternal alcohol use disorder and subsequent child protection contact: a record-linkage population cohort study. Child abuse & neglect, 72, 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, H., 2019. The German federal courts dataset 1950–2019: from paper archives to linked open data. Journal of empirical legal studies, 16 (3), 671–688. doi:10.1111/jels.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, M. and Newnham, A. (2015) ‘How do county courts share the care of children between parents’, Reading and Coventry: University of Reading and University of Warwick. Available online: www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Full%20report.pdf. accessed 15. August 2020
   Google Scholar
• Harron, K., et al. 2020. Preterm birth, unplanned hospital contact, and mortality in infants born to teenage mothers in five countries: an administrative data cohort study. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 24 (6), 645–654. doi:10.1111/ppe.12685
   Google Scholar
• Harron, K.L., et al. 2017. A guide to evaluating linkage quality for the analysis of linked data. International journal of epidemiology, 46 (5), 1699–1710. doi:10.1093/ije/dyx177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwin, J., et al., 2018. Care demand and regional variability in England: 2010/11 to 2016/17. Lancaster: Centre for Child and family Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harwin, J., et al., 2019. The contribution of supervision orders and special guardianship to children’s lives and family justice. Lancaster: Centre for Child and family Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Harwin, J. and Alrouh, B., 2017. New entrants and repeat children: continuity and change in care demand over time. Family law, 47 (4) 404–411.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchings, E., Miles, J., and Woodward, H., 2013. Assembling the jigsaw puzzle: understanding financial settlement on divorce. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. and Kramer, L., 2013. Introduction: the empirical revolution in law. Stanford law review, 65 (6), 1195–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, C.D.J., et al. 2008. A decade of data linkage in Western Australia: strategic design, applications and benefits of the WA data linkage system. Australian health review, 32 (4), 766–777. doi:10.1071/AH080766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, L.D., et al. 2013. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: bias in estimates of socioeconomic inequalities. Epidemiology, 24 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e31827623b1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. and Macleod, A., 2008. Outcomes of applications to court for contact orders after parental separation or divorce. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, C., 2018. The empirical turn in family law. Columbia law review, 118 (1), 227–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janson, C.G., 1996. Retrospective and prospective design and data. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 5 (1), 11–17. doi:10.1007/BF00538537
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jay, M.A. et al. (2017) Who cares for children? population data for family justice research. Available at: http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/observatory-scopingstudy/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.D., et al. 2020. Data resource: population level family justice administrative data with opportunities for data linkage. International journal of population data science, 9, 1339.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K.H., et al. 2019. A profile of the SAIL databank on the UK secure research platform. International journal of population data science, 4, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.T., 1990. Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne state university press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F.L., 2015. Empirical legal research: the gap between facts and values and legal academic training. Utrecht law review, 11 (2), 19–33. doi:10.18352/ulr.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., and Abelson, J., 2012. The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. Social science & medicine, 74 (12), 1843–1850. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lélé, S. and Norgaard, R.B., 2005. Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience, 55 (11), 967–975. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0967:PI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lery, B., Shaw, T.V., and Magruder, J., 2005. Using administrative child welfare data to identify sibling groups. Children and youth services review, 27 (7), 783–791. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, R.A., et al. 2009. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 9 (1), 3. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maclean, M. and Eekelaar, J., 2009. Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., Eekelaar, J., and Bastard, B., 2015. Delivering family justice in the 21st century. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mania, K., 2015. Online dispute resolution: the future of justice. International comparative jurisprudence, 1 (1), 76–86. doi:10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., 2017. The data science of politics. Political studies review, 15 (2), 201–209. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England. 10.1177/1478929917693643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, J., 2010. A new approach to care proceedings. Child & family social work, 15 (3), 369–379. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, J.M., Pearce, J.F., and Bader, K.F., 2008. Care profiling study (ministry of justice research series 4/08). Ministry of Justice and Department of Children, Schools and Families. London.
   Google Scholar
• Medalia, C., et al. 2019. Linking survey and administrative data to measure income, inequality, and mobility. International journal of population data science, 4 (1), 1. doi:10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.939
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice (2020) Family court statistics quarterly: july to September 2020 - GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-july-to-september-2020/family-court-statistics-quarterly-july-to-september-2020 ( Accessed: 5 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• MoJ analysis - Profile | Tableau Public (no date). Available at: https://public.tableau.com/profile/moj.analysis#!/ ( Accessed: 23 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, B.L., et al. 2015. No! formal theory, causal inference, and big data are not contradictory trends in political science. PS, political science & politics, 48 (1), 71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. and Clarke, J., 2009. Publics, politics and power: remaking the public in public services. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• OECD Expert Group, 2014. OECD expert group for international collaboration on microdata access: final report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, C., et al. 2019. Hospitalisations for maternal assault are associated with increased risk of child protection involvement. Child abuse & neglect, 95, 104014. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, C.L., 2013. Work at the boundaries of science: information and the interdisciplinary research process. Springer Science & Business Media. Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, J. and Sandwick, T., 2012. Closing the gap using criminal justice and public health data to improve the identification of mental illness. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, N.J., et al. 2018. Principled approaches to missing data in epidemiologic studies. American journal of epidemiology, 187 (3), 568–575. doi:10.1093/aje/kwx348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, L.L., Nicol, J.P., and Cageorge, S.M., 1987. Using administrative data for longitudinal research: comparisons with primary data collection. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 40 (1), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A. and Silbey, S., 1988. The pull of the policy audience. Law & policy, 10(2‐3) (2–3), 97–166. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1988.tb00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. and Burrows, R., 2007. The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41 (5), 885–899. doi:10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Slota, S.C., et al. 2020. Prospecting (in) the data sciences. Big data & society, 7 (1), 1. doi:10.1177/2053951720906849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind, R.E., 2017. Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The HMCTS reform programme - GOV.UK (no date). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-hmcts-reform-programme#our-reform-programme ( Accessed: 5 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., et al., 2013. Enforcing contact orders: problem-solving or punishment. Exeter: Exeter Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., et al. 2014. Litigants in person in private family law cases. In: Litigants in person in private family law cases. London: Ministry of Justice. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380479/litigants-in-person-in-private-family-law-cases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L. et al. (2017) Finding fault? divorce law and practice in England and wales summary report. Available at: www.nuffieldfoundation.org ( Accessed: 9 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• UK Data Forum, 2013. UK strategy for data resources for social and economic research 2013-2018. London.
   Google Scholar
• UK Statistics Authority (2015) Quality assurance of administrative data. Available at: https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/images-settingthestandar_tcm97-44370.pdf. ( Accessed: 24 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• UK Statistics Authority(2019) Administrative Data Quality Assurance Tool Kit. https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/qualityassurancetoolkit_updated_Feb19_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waind, E., 2020. Trust, security and public interest: striking the balance A review of previous literature on public attitudes towards the sharing and linking of administrative data for research. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, W.E., et al. 2015. Probabilistic linkage. In: K. Harron, eds. Methodological developments in data linkage. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 8–35.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, H.D. and Sefton, M., 2014. ‘Pensions on divorce: an empirical study. Cardiff: Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Woollard, M., et al. 2014. Administrative data: problems and benefits. A perspective from the United Kingdom. In: A. Dusa, eds. Facing the future: european research infrastructures for the humanities and social sciences. Berlin: SCIVERO, 49.
   Google Scholar
• Zylbersztejn, A., Gilbert, R., and Hardelid, P., 2020. Developing a national birth cohort for child health research using a hospital admissions database in England: the impact of changes to data collection practices. PloS one, 15 (12), e0243843. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar