Exploring separated fathers’ understandings and experiences of ‘home’ and homemaking

References

• Alexander, J., et al., 2005. Children’s corporeal agency and use of space in situations of domestic violence. In: B. Evans, J. Hotrton, and T. Skelton, eds. Play, recreation, health and wellbeing. Singapore: Springer, 523–543.
   Google Scholar
• André, S., Dewilde, C., and Muffels, R., 2019. What do housing wealth and tenure have to do with it? Changes in wellbeing of men and women after divorce using Australian panel data. Social science research, 78, 104–118. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasson, J. and Johansson, T., 2019. Becoming a half-time parent: fatherhood after divorce. Journal of family studies, 25 (1), 2–17. doi:10.1080/13229400.2016.1195277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Family Studies, 2019. Parenting arrangements after separation. Research summary. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Accessed 19 July 2021. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/parenting-arrangements-after-separation.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R., 2019. Children in motion: everyday life across two homes. In: L. Murray, et al., eds. Families in motion: ebbing and flowing through space and time. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Campo, M., et al., 2012. Shared parenting time in Australia: exploring children’s views. Journal of social welfare & family law, 34 (3), 295–313. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.750480
   Google Scholar
• Campo, M., et al., 2020a. The meaning of home for children and young people after separation. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (3), 299–318. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1796218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo, M., et al., 2020b. Mothers’ understandings of ‘home’ after relationship separation and divorce. Journal of social welfare and family law, 42 (4), 461-477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R., Dunstan, E., Dunstan, J., & Roopani, D., 2018. Children and young people in separated families: Family law system experiences and needs. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/children-and-young-people-separated-families-family-law-system-experiences
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D., et al., 2014. The economic consequences of divorce in Australia. International journal of law, policy and the family, 28 (1), 26–47. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermott, E., 2003. The ‘intimate father’: defining paternal involvement. Sociological research online, 8 (4), 28–38. doi:10.5153/sro.859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermott, E., 2014. Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dermott, E. and Miller, T., 2015. More than the sum of its parts? Contemporary fatherhood policy, practice and discourse. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4(2), 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easthope, H., 2004. A place called home. Housing, theory and society, 21 (3), 128–138. doi:10.1080/14036090410021360
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B. and Millward, C., 2013. Post-separation parenting and financial arrangements over time recent qualitative findings. Family matters, 92, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B., Sarmas, L., and Morgan, J., 2018. The perils and pitfalls of formal equality in Australian family law reform. Federal law review, 46 (3), 367–396. doi:10.1177/0067205X1804600302
   Google Scholar
• Fehlberg, B. and Smyth, B., 2000. Child support and parent–child contact. Family matters, 57, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H. and Autonen-Vaaraniemi, L., 2019. Moral orientations to post-divorce fatherhood: examining Finnish men’s descriptive practices. Families, relationships and societies, 8 (1), 23–36. doi:10.1332/204674317X14920695828859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L., 2002. The meaning of home: a chimerical concept or a legal challenge? Journal of law and society, 29 (4), 580–610. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francia, L., Millear, P., and Sharman, R., 2019. Addressing family violence post separation–mothers and fathers’ experiences from Australia. Journal of child custody, 16 (3), 211–235. doi:10.1080/15379418.2019.1583151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francia, L. and Millear, P.M., 2019. Less house, more home: adolescent and young adults’ experiences of home following parental separation. Family law review, 8 (1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gingerbread, 2020. Bedroom tax. Accessed 19 July 2021. Available from: https://www.gingerbread.org.uk/information/housing/bedroom-tax/
   Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L. and Sandberg, L., 2019. Creating safe atmospheres? Children’s experiences of grandparents’ affective and spatial responses to domestic violence. Children’s geographies, 17 (5), 514–526. doi:10.1080/14733285.2017.1406896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachet, B., 2019. A room with a vacuum. Spatial perceptions and appropriations of children’s rooms in the context of shared residence. In: M. Halatcheva-Trapp, G. Montanari, and T. Schlinzig, eds. Family and space: rethinking family theory and empirical approaches. Milton, UK: Taylor and Francis, 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Haux, T., McKay, S., and Cain, R., 2017. Shared care after separation in the United Kingdom: limited data, limited practice? Family court review, 55 (4), 572–585. doi:10.1111/fcre.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henman, P. and Mitchell, K., 2001. Estimating the cost of contact for non-resident parents: a budget standards approach. Journal of social policy, 30 (3), 495–520. doi:10.1017/S0047279401006341
   Google Scholar
• Holt, S., 2015. Post‐separation fathering and domestic abuse: challenges and contradictions. Child abuse review, 24 (3), 210–222. doi:10.1002/car.2264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, S., 2016. ‘Quality’ contact post-separation/divorce: a review of the literature. Children and youth services review, 68, 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. and Roberts, C., 2004. Child contact with non-resident parents. Family Policy Briefing, 3. Oxford, UK: Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., 2013. Home talk: girls talking about family togetherness. Home cultures, 10 (3), 315–328. doi:10.2752/175174213X13739735973462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspiew, R., Carson, R., Dunstan, J., Qu, L., Horsfall, B., De Maio, J. et al., 2015. Evaluation of the 2012 Family Violence Amendments: Synthesis Report. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/publications/evaluation-2012-family-violence-amendments
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, C., 2006. Freedom, desire and power: gender processes and presumptions of shared care and responsibility after parental separation. Women’s studies international forum, 29 (2), 184–196. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2006.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macht, A., 2019. Travelling feelings: narratives of sustaining love in two case studies with fathers in family separations. In: L. Murray, et al., eds. Families in motion: ebbing and flowing through space and time. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• Macht, A., 2020. Fatherhood and love: the social construction of masculine emotions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mallett, S., 2004. Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. Sociological review, 52 (1), 62–89. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merla, L. and Nobels, B., 2019. Children negotiating their place through space in multi-local, joint physical custody arrangements. In: L. Murray, et al., eds. Families in motion: ebbing and flowing through space and time. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Taskforce on Child Support. 2005. In the Best Interests of Children - Reforming the Child Support Scheme. Commonwealth of Australia. Available from: https://www.dss.gov.au/our-responsibilities/families-and-children/publications-articles/in-the-best-interests-of-children-reforming-the-child-support-scheme-report-of-the-ministerial-taskforce-on-child-support
   Google Scholar
• Natalier, K. and Dunk-West, P., 2019. What is a good post-separation relationship? The perspectives of Australian parents. Journal of social welfare and family law, 41 (2), 171–187. doi:10.1080/09649069.2019.1590901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalier, K. and Fehlberg, B., 2015. Children’s experiences of ‘home’ and ‘homemaking’ after parents separate: a new conceptual frame for listening and supporting adjustment. Australian journal of family law, 29, 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Natalier, K. and Hewitt, B., 2014. Separated parents reproducing and undoing gender through defining legitimate uses of child support. Gender & society, 28 (6), 904–925. doi:10.1177/0891243214546933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo, D. and Schier, M., 2019. Living in two homes. In: M. Halatcheva-Trapp, G. Montanari, and T. Schlinzig, eds. Family and space: rethinking family theory and empirical approaches. Milton, UK: Taylor and Francis, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, G., 2013. Relationality and moral reasoning in accounts of fathering after separation or divorce: care, gender and working at ‘fairness’. Families, relationships and societies, 2 (3), 409–424. doi:10.1332/204674313X667407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, G., 2014. Fathering after separation or divorce: navigating domestic, public and moral spaces. Families, relationships and societies, 3 (2), 219–233. doi:10.1332/204674314X14017856302453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raley, R.K. and Sweeney, M., 2020. Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: a decade in review. Journal of marriage and family, 82 (1), 81–99. doi:10.1111/jomf.12651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schier, M., 2019. Fatherhood post-separation: practicing fathering from a distance and in brief co-present phases. In: M. Halatcheva-Trapp, G. Montanari, and T. Schlinzig, eds. Family and space: rethinking family theory and empirical approaches. Milton, UK: Taylor and Francis, 170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. and Neale, B., 1999. Family fragments? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B., 2005. Time the rethink time? The experience of time with children after divorce. Family matters, 71, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B. and Chisholm, R., 2017. Shared‐time parenting after separation in Australia: precursors, prevalence, and postreform patterns. Family court review, 55 (4), 586–603. doi:10.1111/fcre.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, B. and Moloney, L., 2019. Post‐separation parenting disputes and the many faces of high conflict: theory and research. Australian and New Zealand journal of family therapy, 40 (1), 74–84. doi:10.1002/anzf.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., 2020. ‘I don’t know where all the cutlery is’: exploring materiality and homemaking in post-separation families. Social & cultural geography, 1–17.d. doi:10.1080/14649365.2019.1705995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh, J., 1999. The unaccommodated woman: home, homelessness and identity. The sociological review, 47 (1), 91–109. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, N., 2002. ‘Not under my roof!’ Young people’s experience of home. Youth & society, 34 (2), 214–231. doi:10.1177/004411802237864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G.B., 2006. ‘The non-resident parental role for separated fathers: a review’. International journal of law, policy and the family, 20 (3), 286–316. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl014
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., Houmøller, K., and Bernays, S., 2012. ‘Home, and not some house’: young people’s sensory construction of family relationships in domestic spaces. Children’s geographies, 10 (1), 95–107. doi:10.1080/14733285.2011.638172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar