The ‘madness’ of accessing justice: legal mobilisation, welfare benefits and empowerment

References

• Albiston, C.R. and Sandefur, R.L., 2013. Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. Wisconsin Law Review, 1, 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Arrington, C.L., 2014. Leprosy, legal mobilization, and the public sphere in Japan and South Korea. Law & Society Review, 48 (3), 563–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrington, C.L., 2016. Accidental activists: victim movements and government accountability in Japan and South Korea. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, N.J. and Pleasence, P., 2018. Mental health, legal problems and the impact of changes to the legal aid scheme: secondary Analysis of 2014–2015: legal problem resolution survey data. London: Mind. Available from: https://www.mind.org.uk/media/23586755/balmer-and-pleasence-lprs-analysis-for-mind-110418.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. and Burke, T.F., 2006. The diffusion of rights: from law on the books to organizational rights practices. Law & Society Review, 40 (3), 493–524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00271.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J. and Burke, T.F., 2012. Making way: legal mobilization, organizational response, and wheelchair access. Law & Society Review, 46 (1), 167–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00476.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudot, P.-Y., 2018. Layering rights: the case of disability policies in France (2006–2016). Social Policy and Society, 17 (1), 117–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2017. ’Distrust’ in PIP system, says review. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39447200 [Accessed 3 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Bumiller, K., 1988. The civil rights society: the social construction of victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, P. (2016) UN panel criticises UK failure to uphold disabled people’s rights. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/31/un-panel-criticises-uk-failure-to-uphold-disabled-peoples-rights [Accessed 14 January 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A.K. and Cummings, S., 2012. Public interest lawyering: a contemporary perspective. New York: Aspen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, L.J. and Engel, D.M., 2019. Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 335–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, D., 2004. Legal consciousness: some observations. Modern Law Review, 67, 928–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00518.x
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, M. and Spandler, H., 2016. Solidarities and tensions in mental health politics: mad studies and psychopolitics. Critical and Radical Social Work, 4 (3), 357–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/204986016X14739257401605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Work and Pensions. 2010. Consultation on disability living allowance reform (Cmd 7984).
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, D., 2017. Re-claiming disability: identity, procedural justice, and the disability determination process. Law & Social Inquiry, 42 (1), 195–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, M., Silove, D., and Gale, F., 2012. Mental health, human rights, and their relationship: an introduction. In: M. Dudley, D. Silove, and F. Gale, eds. Mental health and human rights, vision, praxis, and courage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, D.M. and Munger, F.W., 2003. Rights of inclusion: law and identity in the life stories of Americans with disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, C.R., 1998. The rights revolution: lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felstiner, W.L.F., Abel, R.L., and Sarat, A., 1980. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15 (3/4), 631–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2003. Madness and civilization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M., 1974. Why the haves come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9 (1), 95–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, K., 2015a. Law and disability. In: A. Sarat and P. Ewick, eds. The handbook of law and society. Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 322–336.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, K., 2015b. Rights enabled: the disability revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer, K. and Mor, S., 2019. Special issue guest editors’ introduction: disability legal studies. Law & Society Review, 53 (4), 948–949. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons. 2018. Welfare: the secretary of state for work and pensions. House of commons hansard: 634. Available from: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-01-19/debates/18011939000006/Welfare [Accessed 7 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, A., 2017. PIP: the disability benefit that almost killed my wife. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/10/pip-disability-benefit-almost-killed-my-wife-personal-independence-payment [Accessed 1 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2018. UK poverty 2018: a comprehensive analysis of poverty trends and figures. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available from: https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/uk-poverty-2018 [Accessed 19 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. and Vanhala, L., 2010. The shift to the rights model of disability in the EU and Canada. Regional & Federal Studies, 20 (1), 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560903174766.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., 2018. Commons briefing papers CBP-7911: changes to the personal independence payment eligibility criteria. London: House of Commons Library. Available at: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7911 [Accessed 30 November 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kissane, R.J., 2012. Poor women’s moral economies of nonprofit social service use: conspicuous constraint and empowerment in the hollow state. Sociological Perspectives, 55 (1), 189–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2012.55.1.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A., 2006. The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: new era or false dawn. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34 (2), 563–619.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, A., 2017. Legal mobilization within the bureaucracy: disability rights and the implementation of antidiscrimination law in Sweden. Law & Policy, 39 (3), 237–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune, A. and Ringelheim, J., 2019. Workers with disabilities between legal changes and persisting exclusion: how contradictory rights shape legal mobilization. Law & Society Review, 53 (4), 983–1015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, M., 2006. Law and social movements: contemporary perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2 (1), 17–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, M.W., 1994. Rights at work: pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minkowitz, T., 2007. The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the right to be free from nonconsensual psychiatric interventions. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 405–428.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights. 2018. Report on visit to the United Kingdom, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. New York: Human Rights Council. Available from: https://undocs.org/A/HRC/41/39/Add.1 [Accessed 7 January 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Perlin, M.L. and É, S., 2012. Mental health law and human rights: evolution and contemporary challenges. In: M. Dudley, D. Silove, and F. Gale, eds. Mental health and human rights, vision, praxis, and courage. Oxford, [England]: Oxford University Press, 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J., 2007. Mental health and the experience of housing rights problems. People, Place and Policy, 2 (1), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J., 2009. Mental health and the experience of social problems involving rights: findings from the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16 (1), 123–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802471792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recovery in the Bin. 2016. About. Available from: https://recoveryinthebin.org/ [Accessed 14 January 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Revillard, A., 2017. Social movements and the politics of bureaucratic rights enforcement: insights from the allocation of disability rights in France. Law & Social Inquiry, 42 (2), 450–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revillard, A., 2019. Realizing the right to access in France: between implementation and activation. Law & Society Review, 53 (4), 950–982. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seccombe, K., James, D., and Walters, K.B., 1998. They think you ain’t much of nothing”: the social construction of the welfare mother. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60 (4), 849–865. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/353629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbey, S.S., 2005. After legal consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1 (1), 323–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J., 2002. Unwanted claims: the politics of participation in the US welfare system. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H., Anderson, J., and Sapey, B., eds, 2015. Madness, distress and the politics of disablement. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, J., 2012. Towards a socially situated model of mental distress. In: H. Spandler, J. Anderson, and B. Sapey, eds. Madness, distress and the politics of disablement. Bristol: The Policy Press, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L., 2011. Making rights a reality? Disability rights activists and legal mobilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhala, L., 2015. The diffusion of disability rights in Europe. Human Rights Quarterly, 37, 831–853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2015.0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar