References
- Alexander, N., 2008. The Mediation Metamodel: Understanding Practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly [online], 26, 97–123. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/crq.2251
- Astor, H., 2008. Making a ‘genuine effort’ in family dispute resolution: What does it mean? Australian Journal of Family Law [online] 22(2) 101–124. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1294019
- Attorney General’s Department, Australian Government (October 2018) Fact Sheets [online] Available from: https://www.ag.gov.au/families-and-marriage/publications?search=&page=4
- Australian Law Reform Commission, 2018. Review of the Family Law System, Discussion Paper No 86. [online] Available from: https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/dp86_review_of_the_family_law_system_4.pdf
- Australian Law Reform Commission. 2019. Family Law for the Future – An Inquiry into the Family Law System, Final report ALRC Report 135, March 2019. [online] Available from: https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/alrc_report_135_final_report_web-min_12_optimized_1-1.pdf
- Australian Institute of Family Studies.2020. Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/aifs_submission_to_joint_parliamentary_inquiry.pdf
- Boulle, L. and Field, R. 2020. Re-appraising Mediation’s Value of Self-determination. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal [online] 30,96–105. Available from: https://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I8bd7dbec6d8c11ea9e45f68329176fe2&isTocNav=true&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&startChunk=1&endChunk=1
- Brandon, M., Fisher L., and De Biasi, F. 2018. Mediating with Families, 4th Ed. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia.
- Cleak, H. and Bickerdike, A. 2016. One way or many ways Screening for family violence in family mediation. AIFS Family Matters [online] 98 (16–25) Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/fm98-hcab.pdf
- Cleak, H., et al., 2018. Screening for Partner Violence Among Family Mediation Clients: Differentiating Types of Abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence [online] 33(7) 1118–1146. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0886260515614559.
- Crowe, J., et al., 2018. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Expanding the Concept of the Shadow of the Law in Family Dispute Resolution. Sydney Law Review [online] 40(3) 319–338. Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3283492
- Crowe, J and Field, R., 2019. The Empty Idea of Mediator Impartiality. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal [online] 29, 273–280 . Available from: https://adrresearch.net/2019/10/03/the-empty-idea-of-mediator-impartiality/.
- Douglas, K., & Hurley, J. 2017. The potential of procedural justice in mediation: study into mediators understandings. Bond Law Review, {online] 29(1), 69–86. Available from: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/BondLawRw/2017/5.pdf
- Family Law Act 1975 no 53, 1975 Compilation No 88 10 March 2019. Family Law (Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners) Regulations 2008 Select Legislative Instrument 2008 No. 183 as amended made under the Family Law Act 1975. Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing, Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra.
- Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2011 No. 189, 2011.
- Family Law Rules 2004 Statutory Rules No 375, 2003 made under the Family Law Act 1975.
- Family Court of Australia and Federal Circuit Court of Australia (2020) Joint Practice Direction: JPDI of 2020 Core Principles in the Case Management of Family Law Matters.
- Federal Circuit Court of Australia (2020) Practice Direction No 1 Judicial mediations in family law matters. [online] Available from: https://www.fcfcoa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-09/FCC%20PD%201%20of%202019%20-%20Judicial%20mediations%20in%20family%20law%20matters.pdf
- Field, R and Crowe, J., 2017. Playing the Language Game of Family Mediation: Implications for Mediator Ethics. Law in Context [online] 35(1), 84–101. Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090547
- Field, R., 2016. Comment: A Call for a Safe Model of Family Mediation, Bond Law Review [online] 83-88. Available from: https://blr.scholasticahq.com/article/5630.
- Gutman, J. and Grant, J., 2017. Ethical Conundrums Facing Mediators - Comparing Processes, Identifying Challenges and Opportunities. Law in context [online] 35(1), 101–117. Available from: https://journals.latrobe.edu.au/index.php/law-in-context/article/view/34.
- Harman, J. 2017. An Imperfect Protection: Attitudes of Family Dispute Resolution Practitionersto Confidentiality. Bond Law review [online] 29(1), 39–67. Available from: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/BondLawRw/2017/4.pdf.
- Harman, J [2019a].The Intersection of family violence and family dispute resolution: Implications for evidence gathering and mediation confidentiality. Australian Journal of Family Law. [online] 33, 1–28. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/document/?pdmfid=1201008&crid=cdcc2d6b-5e09-4d93-8e3c-a24781f7641c&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fanalytical-materials-au%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5WF5-BDG1-JK4W-M284-00000-00&pdtocnodeidentifier=AAFAABAAB&ecomp=b6rfk&prid=bd3e1b93-180f-41e8-b5f8-48bf29a4c92c
- Harman, Judge J [2019b]. The Centrality of the Family Dispute Resolution Process to the Separating Family, the Community and Administration of Justice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, [online] 40, 8–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1352. 1
- Hebblewhite, M. 2103. Ethics and Related Issues in Mediation (this is a CPD compulsory subject program for lawyers (except WA) - ETHICS). Available from: https://www.tved.net.au/index.cfm?SimpleDisplay=PaperDisplay.cfm&PaperDisplay=https://www.tved.net.au/PublicPapers/June_2013,_Lawyers_Education_Channel,_Ethics_and_Related_Issues_in_Mediation__this_is_a_CPD_compulsory_subject_program_for_lawyers__except_WA____ETHICS_.html.
- Higgs Howarth, S. and Caruana, C. 2017. Working paper Appendix A: Mandatory mediation in family law – a review of the literature. Working Paper No 2/2017 Certifying mediation: a study of section 60I. [online] Available from: http://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/CSRM_60ICERT_APPENDIX_A.pdf
- House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs, 2017. A better family law system to support and protect those affected by family violence. Available from: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportrep/024109/toc_pdf/Abetterfamilylawsystemtosupportandprotectthoseaffectedbyfamilyviolence.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf
- International Council for Online Dispute Resolution (nd) ICODR Standards. Available from: https://icodr.org/standards/
- Jani, S & Getz, C. 2012. Mediating from a Distance, Suggested Practice Guidelines for Family Mediators. 2nd ed. MediateBC and British Columbia Law Society. [online] Available from: https://www.mediatebc.com/sites/default/files/Guidelines_Mediating-from-a-Distance-%28Second-edition%29_0.pdf
- Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System (October 2020) Improvements in family law proceedings Interim Report. Available from: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024449/toc_pdf/Improvementsinfamilylawproceedings.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf.
- Joint Select Committee on Australia’s Family Law System (March 2021) Improvements in family law proceedings Second interim report. Available from: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024551/toc_pdf/Improvementsinfamilylawproceedings.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf
- Law Council of Australia (2019) Ethical Guidelines for Mediators. [ online] Available form: (https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/publicassets/a44d140e-0994-ea11-9434-005056be13b5/Ethical%20Guidelines%20for%20Mediators%20Final%2016%20May%202019.pdf).
- Macfarlane, J. 2002. Mediating ethically: The Limits of codes of conduct and the Potential of a Reflective Model, Osgood Hall Law Journal, [online] 40(1) 49–87. Available form: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1450&context=ohlj.
- Mediator Standards Board. 2015. Australian National Mediator Standards Practice Standards [ online] Available from: https://msb.org.au/resources/documents
- Mnookin, R & Kornhauser, L., (1970) Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, Yale Law Review [ online]. Available from: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol88/iss5/4.
- Morris, M, et al. 2018. Predictors of Engagement in Family Mediation and Outcomes for Families that Fail to Engage. Family Process, [online] 57(1) 131–146. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.12270.
- National Centre for Technology and Dispute Resolution and International Council for Online Dispute, Resolution. nd. ODR Standards, Principles, & Guidelines, [online] Available from: https://odr.info/standards/.
- National Legal Aid. 2018. Submission Australian Law Reform Commission Review of the family law system Discussion Paper 86. [online] Available from: https://www.nationallegalaid.org/resources/nla-submissions/#gdocs_preview_standalone.
- Ojelabi, LA. and Gutman, J. 2020. Family dispute resolution and access to justice in Australia. International Journal of Law in Context [online] 16, 197–215. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/family-dispute-resolution-and-access-to-justice-in-australia/7FA521E3F7AE605C256C15BA26A3E161 doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552320000142. 2
- Rares, S. 2015. Is Access to Justice a Right or a Service? Symposium Australian Centre for Justice Innovation and the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration. Available from: https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j-20150626
- Schmitz, A. and Wing L. 2021. Beneficial and ethical ODR for Family Issues. Family Court Review [online] 59(2), 250–267. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561872. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12572
- Smyth, B. et al. 2017. Certifying mediation: a study of section 60I certificates working Paper No 2/2017. Centre for Social Research and Methods, ANU Nov 2017, 25. Available from: https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/2019/2/CSRM_WP2_2017_60ICERT.pdf
- Taylor, J. (2019. It is time to abolish the ‘genuine effort’ and ‘non-genuine effort’ certificates in family dispute resolution. Australian Journal of Family Law [online] 33, 29–50. Available from: https://advance.lexis.com/document/index?crid=1a4f07d9-d358-442e-8f17-01fbbcb393ce&pdpermalink=10465736-46bb-4410-8db5-2d2ea005ee26&pdmfid=1201008&pdisurlapi=true.
- Taylor, J. (2020a) A Call for a Multi-framework Approach to Family Dispute Resolution Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal [online] 30, 284–294. Available from: https://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I61a76c492aed11eba9c5a55edf1410c8&isTocNav=true&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&startChunk=1&endChunk=1.
- Taylor, J. 2020b. A Critical Analysis of Practitioners issuing ‘not appropriate for family dispute resolution’ certificates under the Family Law Act 1976 (CTH). Adelaide Law Review 41(1), 149–178. Available from: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/2020/5.pdf.
- Waye, V. 2016. Mandatory mediation in Australia’s civil justice system Common Law World Review [online] 45(2–3) 214–235. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1473779516645455.
- Wilson-Evered, E and Zeleznikow J. 2021. Online Dispute Resolution Evidence for Creating the Ideal People and Technology Interface, Spinger Cham [online]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5