A happy medium? Telephone hearings for litigants in person facing housing eviction

References

• Bannon, A.L. and Keith, D., 2021. Remote court: principles for virtual proceedings during the covid-19 pandemic and beyond. Northwestern University law review, 115, 1875–1920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., 2013. Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. and Jackson, K., 2013. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bezdek, B., 1991. Silence in the court: participation and subordination of poor tenants’ voices in legal process. Hofstra law review, 20, 533.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2022. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M., 2021. Remote hearings in the social security tribunal: should we be worried? Journal of social security law, 28, 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Byrom, N., 2019. Developing the detail: evaluating the impact of court reform in england and wales on access to justice. London: Legal Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, M.T. and Currie, J., 2022. The effects of legal representation on tenant outcomes in housing court: evidence from New York City’s Universal access program. Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi, J.R., et al., 1984. Major findings of the New Mexico experiment of teleconferenced administrative fair hearings. University of Miami law review, 38, 647–655.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi, J.R. and Hurley, T.L., 1979. Attitudes toward the use of the telephone in administrative fair hearings: the California experience. Administrative law review, 31, 247–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, D. and Mumford, A., 2021. Introduction. In: D. Cowan and A. Mumford, eds. Pandemic legalities. 1 ed. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Defoor, J.A., 1984. Introduction to special topic: telecommunications in the courtroom. University of Miami law review, 38, 590–592.
   Google Scholar
• Denvir, C. and Selvarajah, A.D., 2022. Safeguarding access to justice in the age of the online court. The modern law review, 85 (1), 25–68. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. and Bell, M., 2015. Housing, poverty, and the law. Annual review of law and social science, 11 (1), 15–35. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digital Inclusion Research Group May 2017. Digital New Zealanders: the Pulse of our Nation. Wellington: Report to Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment and the Department of Internal Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., 1988. Empowerment or enforcement? Some questions about power and control in divorce mediation. In: R. Dingwall and J. Eekelaar, eds. Divorce mediation and the legal process. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 150-167.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, B., 2008. Access to justice in courts and tribunals compared - residential tenancy disputes in Sydney (1971-2004). Civil justice quarterly, 27, 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I.G., et al., 2021. Do lawyers matter? Early evidence on eviction patterns after the rollout of Universal access to counsel in New York City. Housing policy debate, 31 (3–5), 540–561. doi:10.1080/10511482.2020.1825009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, R. and Crowe, J., 2020. Mediation ethics. Northampton: ElgarOnline, Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Galanter, M., 1974. Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & society review, 9 (1), 95–160. doi:10.2307/3053023
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union, 2021. Measuring digital development: facts and figures 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunications Union.
   Google Scholar
• Justice, 2018. Preventing digital exclusion from online justice. London: JUSTICE.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, D. and Marcuse, P., 2016. In defense of housing: the politics of crisis. London, England: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, G., 2020. Remote justice? Litigants in person and participation in court processes during Covid-19. Modern law review forum, 005.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L., 2008. The unbearable lightness of being? Shifts towards the virtual trial. Journal of law and society, 35 (4), 464–489. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L., 2021. Virtual poverty? What happens when criminal trials go online? In: D. Cowan and A. Mumford, eds. Pandemic legalities. 1 ed. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 41-52.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L. and Rowden, E., 2020. The democratic courthouse: a modern history of design, due process and dignity. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Law Commission, 2008. Tribunals in New Zealand. Wellington, N.Z: Law Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Pirini, M. and High, A., 2021. Dignity and mana in the “third law” of Aotearoa New Zealand. New Zealand Universities law review, 29, 623–647.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., 2021. Remote rituals in virtual courts. Journal of law and society, 48 (3), 334–361. doi:10.1111/jols.12304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., Tait, D., and Mccurdy, M., 2021. Justice reimagined: challenges and opportunities with implementing virtual courts. Current issues in criminal justice, 33 (1), 94–110. doi:10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowden, E., et al., 2013. Gateways to justice: design and operational guidelines for remote participation in court proceedings. Penrith, NSW: University of Western Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., et al., 2021. Remote hearings in the family court post pandemic. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Harker, L., and Rothera, S., 2020. Remote hearings in the family justice system: a rapid consultation. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Sabbeth, K.A., 2018. Housing defense as the New Gideon. Harvard journal of law and gender, 41, 55.
   Google Scholar
• Seron, C., Frankel, M., and Van Ryzin, G., 2001. The impact of legal counsel on outcomes for poor tenants in New York City’s housing court: results of a randomized experiment. Law & society review, 35 (2), 419. doi:10.2307/3185408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand, 2018. Access to telecommunication systems in New Zealand households. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand, 2020. Housing in Aotearoa 2020. Wellington: Stats NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, J., 2018. A theory of civil problem-solving courts. New York University law review, 93, 1579–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taumaunu, H., 2021. Calls for Transformative Change and the District Court Response. Waikato Law Review, 29, 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Toubman, A.A., Mcardle, T., and Rogers-Tomer, L., 1995. Due process implications of telephone hearings: the case for an individualized approach to scheduling telephone hearings. University of Michigan journal of law reform, 29, 407.
   Google Scholar
• Toy-Cronin, B. and Bierre, S., 2022. Sustaining tenancies or swift evictions: rent arrears in the tenancy tribunal. Victoria University of Wellington law review, 53 (1), 105–128. doi:10.26686/vuwlr.v53i1.7585
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, J., et al., 2020. Longitudinal study of the housing and mental health outcomes of tenants appearing in eviction court. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 56 (9), 1679–1686. doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01953-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, J. and Huang, M., 2019. Systematic review of psychosocial factors associated with evictions. Health & social care in the community, 27 (3), e1–e9. doi:10.1111/hsc.12619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T.R., 2004. Enhancing police legitimacy. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 593 (1), 84–99. doi:10.1177/0002716203262627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Vera, H., et al., 1982. The threat of home eviction and its effects on health through the equity lens: a systematic review. Social science & medicine, 175, 199–208. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.010
   Google Scholar