Exclusion in the interests of inclusion: who should stay offline in the emerging world of online justice?

References

• A4AI, 2020. Meaningful connectivity: a new target to raise the bar for internet access. London: Alliance for Affordable Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Allmann, K., 2022. UK digital poverty evidence review 2022. London: Digital Poverty Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Allmann, K. and Blank, G., 2021. Rethinking digital skills in the era of compulsory computing: methods, measurement, policy and theory. Information, Communication & Society, 24 (5), 633–648. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., 2012. Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social epistemology, 26 (2), 163–173. doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. (2021) Evaluation of remote hearings during the COVID pandemic – research report, September 2022. London: HMCTS, Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1040183/Evaluation_of_remote_hearings_v23.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J.B. 2020. Employment tribunals (england and wales) presidential guidance on remote and in-person hearings judge barry clarke president dated: 14 september 2020, courts and tribunals judiciary, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/14-Sept-2020-SPT-ET-EW-PG-Remote-and-In-Person-Hearings-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clements, M. 2021. First-tier tribunal (immigration and asylum chamber) user guide october 2021 to december 2021, courts and tribunals judiciary, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Immigration-Asylum-User-Guide-October-December-2021-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. and Jewkes, R., 1995. What is participatory research? Social science & medicine, 41 (12), 1667–1676. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunal Judiciary. 2020. Review of court arrangements due to COVID-19, message from the lord chief justice, issued 23 March 2020, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/review-of-court-arrangements-due-to-covid-19-message-from-the-lord-chief-justice/
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (no date, subject to constant updating), coronavirus (COVID-19) advice and guidance, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/coronavirus-covid-19-advice-and-guidance/
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020a. Message for circuit and district judges sitting in civil and family from the lord chief justice, master of the rolls and president of the family division, April 2020, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Message-to-CJJ-and-DJJ-9-April-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020b. Coronavirus (COVID-19): message from the lord chief justice to judges in the civil and family courts. 19 March 2020. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-message-from-the-lord-chief-justice-to-judges-in-the-civil-and-family-courts/
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020c. Amended listing priorities in county court – COVID-19, issued: 14.05.20, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Amended-Civil-Listing-Priorities-1305.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020d. Civil justice in england and wales protocol regarding remote hearings 26 March 2020, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Remote-hearings.Protocol.Civil_.GenerallyApplicableVersion.f-amend-26_03_20-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020e. Jury trials, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/jury-trials/
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2020f. Contingency Planning – Courts and Tribunals, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/contingency-planning-courts-and-tribunals/
   Google Scholar
• Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. 2021. Message from the lord chief justice: latest COVID-19 restrictions, published 5th January 2021. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/message-from-the-lord-chief-justice-latest-covid-19-restrictions/
   Google Scholar
• Denvir, C., et al., 2021. Access to online courts: exploring the relationship between legal and digital capability. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3838153
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture, Media, and Sport. (2017). Digital skills and inclusion—giving everyone access to the digital skills they need, September 2022. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/2-digital-skills-and-inclusion-giving-everyone-access-to-the-digital-skills-they-need
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, L. and Munro, V.E., 2014. A ‘special’ delivery? Exploring the impact of screens, live-links and video-recorded evidence on mock juror deliberation in rape trials. Social & Legal Studies, 23 (1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/0964663913496676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2020. Inclusive justice: a system designed for all – interim evidence report: video hearings and their impact on effective participation, September 2022. Available at: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/inclusive_justice_a_system_designed_for_all_interim_report_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N., et al., 2020. Video enabled justice evaluation. Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner and University of Surrey, September 2022. available from: http://spccweb.thco.co.uk/media/4851/vej-final-report-ver-11b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, A. 2018. Preventing Digital Exclusion from Online Justice – A Report of JUSTICE, September 2022. Available at: https://files.justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/06170424/Preventing-Digital-Exclusion-from-Online-Justice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M., 2007. Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M., 2013. Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? Synthese, 190 (7), 1317–1332. doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0227-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, C., 1994. Out of place: gender, public places, and situational disadvantage. In: R. Friedland and D. Boden, eds. NowHere: space, time and modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 335–355. doi:10.1525/9780520342095-011
   Google Scholar
• Good Things Foundation (2020) HMCTS digital support service implementation review, September 2020. Available at: https://www.goodthingsfoundation.org/insights/hmcts-digital-support-service-implementation-review/
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Hastings, D.P., and Chowdhury, G., 2021. Understanding the costs and challenges of the digital divide through UK council services. Journal of Information Science, 016555152110406. doi:10.1177/01655515211040664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E.J., 2017. The social relativity of digital exclusion: applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory, 27 (3), 223–242. doi:10.1111/comt.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E.J., 2021. The digital disconnect: the causes and consequences of digital inequalities. Los Angeles  London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E.J. and Reisdorf, B.C., 2017. The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19 (8), 1253–1270. doi:10.1177/1461444816634676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMCTS. 2020 March. HMCTS Telephone and Video Hearings: information about how HMCTS uses telephone and video technology. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hmcts-telephone-and-video-hearings-during-coronavirus-outbreak
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS. 2020a. Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals guidance, September 2022. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-courts-and-tribunals-planning-and-preparation#assessing-and-managing-coronavirus-risk
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS. 2020b. COVID-19: overview of HMCTS recovery for civil and family courts and tribunals November, 2020, Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/932496/HMCTS_CFT_Recovery_Plan_v2b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS. 2020d What to expect when joining a telephone or video hearing, September 2022. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/what-to-expect-when-joining-a-telephone-or-video-hearing
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS 2021a Evaluation of remote hearings during the COVID-19 pandemic, September 2022. Technical Appendix, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1039520/Evaluation_of_remote_hearings_-_technical_appendix.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS 2020c public user event 2020: lessons from COVID-19 to enhance users’ experience of remote hearings, 6 Nov 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKFS-7tqawQ&list=PLORVvk_w75Py33vrcOTdJXzfdLB9xVUhU&index=9
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, G. 2022. The universal service obligation (USO) for broadband. House of Commons Library Research Briefing, September 2022. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8146/ [ accessed 10/07/22]
   Google Scholar
• Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC), 19932021.The Inclusive Design Institute’s Inclusive Design Guide, September 2022. Available at: https://guide.inclusivedesign.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Judge Sarah. 2020. Video hearing guidance for representatives in mental health tribunals, courts and tribunals judiciary, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Video-Hearing-Guidance-for-Representatives-in-Mental-Health-Tribunals.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Judicial College, 2021. Equal treatment bench book 2021, Guidance for Judges and Magistrates for. London: Judicial College.
   Google Scholar
• Judiciary of England and Wales. 2020. Civil justice in england and wales protocol regarding remote hearings, 26 March 2020, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Remote-hearings.Protocol.Civil_.GenerallyApplicableVersion.f-amend-26_03_20-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Judiciary of England and Wales. 2020a. Remote access to the court of protection guidance 31 March 2020 Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/20200331-Court-of-Protection-Remote-Hearings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Judiciary of England and Wales. 2020b. Guidance for the conduct of remote costs hearings, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Guidance-for-the-Conduct-of-Remote-Costs-Hearings-v.4-1.docx
   Google Scholar
• Kotamraju, N.P. and van der Geest, T.M., 2012. The tension between user-centred design and e-government services. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31 (3), 261–273. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.563797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B.C.-P., 2021. The impact of intersectionality of multiple identities on the digital health divide, quality of life and loneliness amongst older adults in the UK. The British Journal of Social Work, 51 (8), 3077–3097. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcaa149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyds Bank (2021) UK consumer digital index, September 2022. Available at: https://www.lloydsbank.com/banking-with-us/whats-happening/consumer-digital-index.html
   Google Scholar
• Lloyds Bank (2021a) Essential digital skills report, September 2022. Available at: https://www.lloydsbank.com/assets/media/pdfs/banking_with_us/whats-happening/211109-lloyds-essential-digital-skills-report-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Mr Justice. 2020. Remote access family court, 25 March 2020, Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-Remote-Access-Family-Court-Version-2-Final-25.03.20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marks, A. 2016. What is a court? Justice report, September 2022. Available at: https://files.justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/06170726/JUSTICE-What-is-a-Court-Report-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, Rt Hon Sir A., 2021. The family court and COVID 19: the road ahead 2021, 8th january 2021, courts and tribunals judiciary, September 2022. Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/message-from-the-president-of-the-family-division-the-road-ahead-2021/
   Google Scholar
• McKay, C., 2018. The pixelated prisoner: prison video links, court ‘appearance’ and the justice matrix. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morte-Nadal, T. and Esteban-Navarro, M., 2022. Digital competences for improving digital inclusion in e-government services: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692110709. doi:10.1177/16094069211070935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L., 2008. The unbearable lightness of being? Shifts towards the virtual trial. Journal of Law and Society, 35 (4), 464–489. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L. and Rowden, E., 2019. The democratic courthouse: a modern history of design, due process and dignity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L., Rowden, E., and Tsalapatanis, A., 2022. Supporting online justice: enhancing accessibility, participation and procedural fairness.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, L. and Tsalapatanis, 2021. Putting us in our place: recognising the parasitic tendencies of the socio-legal researcher. blogpost: Frontiers of Socio-Legal Studies, September 2022. https://frontiers.csls.ox.ac.uk/putting-us-in-our-place/
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Family Justice Observatory. 2020. Remote hearings in the family justice system. A rapid evidence review, September 2022. Available at: https://www.nuffieldfjo.org.uk/resource/remote-hearings-rapid-consultation
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2022. Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes Report 2022, September 2022. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/adults/adults-media-use-and-attitudes
   Google Scholar
• ONS. 2019. Exploring the UK’s digital divide. Office for National Statistics, September 2022. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/articles/exploringtheuksdigitaldivide/2019-03-04
   Google Scholar
• ONS. 2021. Internet Users, UK: 2020: Internet use in the UK, Annual Estimates by Age, Sex, Disability and Geographical Location. Office for National Statistics, Statistical Bulletin, September 2022. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2020
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, V.M. and Hollenbeck, C.R., 2021. Designing for all: consumer response to inclusive design. Journal of consumer psychology, 31 (2), 360–381. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J. and Woolfson, R., 1999. Preliminary hearings: video links evaluation of pilot projects. Final Report, September 2022. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Woolfson/publication/344220066_Preliminary_Hearings_Video_Links_Evaluation_of_Pilot_Projects_Final_Report_Video_Link_Pilot_Evaluation_Contents/links/5f5d0305299bf1d43cfe3d9b/Preliminary-Hearings-Video-Links-Evaluation-of-Pilot-Projects-Final-Report-Video-Link-Pilot-Evaluation-Contents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell-Lawton, M., 2001. Designing by degree: assessing and incorporating individual accessiblity needs. In: W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, eds. Universal Design Handbook. New York: McGraw Hill Professional, 7.1–7.14.
   Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B.C., Petrovčič, A., and Grošelj, D., 2021. Going online on behalf of someone else: characteristics of Internet users who act as proxy users. New Media & Society, 23 (8), 2409–2429. doi:10.1177/1461444820928051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringaert, L., 2001. User/expert involvement in universal design. In: W.F.E. Preiser and E. Ostroff, eds. Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw Hill Professional, 6.1–6.14.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., 2021. Remote rituals in virtual courts. Journal of Law and Society, 48 (3), 334–361. doi:10.1111/jols.12304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner, M. and McCurdy, M., 2018. Implementing video hearings (party-to-state): a process evaluation. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M. and McCurdy, M., 2020. Video hearings process evaluation final report. HMCTS
   Google Scholar
• Rowden, E. and Wallace, A., 2018. Remote judging: the impact of video links on the image and the role of the judge. International Journal of Law in Context, 14 (4), 504–524. doi:10.1017/S1744552318000216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Harker, L., and Rothera, S., 2020. Remote hearings in the family justice system: reflections and experiences. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory. September.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, A., 2021. Video-hearings in europe before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Court Administration, 12 (2), 3–21. doi:10.36745/ijca.379
   Google Scholar
• Terry, M., Johnson, S., and Thompson, D.P., 2010. Virtual court pilot outcome evaluation. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J., et al., 2020. Judicial review in the administrative court during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal, Available at SSRN 3580367 doi:10.2139/ssrn.3580367.
   Google Scholar