420
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Risks and benefits of post-separation parenting apps: perceptions of family law professionals in Australia and New Zealand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2019. Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11 (4), 589–597.
  • Chatterjee, R., et al., 2018. The Spyware Used in Intimate Partner Violence. Proceedings - 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2018, 2018-May, San Francisco, United States: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 441–458.
  • Davis, J., 2020. How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Douglas, H., Harris, B.A., and Dragiewicz, M., 2019. Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Family Violence: Women’s Experiences. The British Journal of Criminology, 59 (3), 551–570. doi:10.1093/bjc/azy068.
  • Dragiewicz, M., et al. 2018. Technology Facilitated Coercive Control: Domestic Violence and the Competing Roles of Digital Media Platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18 (4), 609–625. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341.
  • Dragiewicz, M., et al. 2021. “What’s Mum’s Password?”: Australian Mothers’ Perceptions of Children’s Involvement in Technology-Facilitated Coercive Control. Journal of Family Violence, 37 (1), 137–149. doi:10.1007/s10896-021-00283-4.
  • Dworkin, J., McCann, E., and McGuire, J.K., 2016. Coparenting in the Digital Era: Exploring Divorced Parents’ Use of Technology. In: G. Gianesini and S.L. Blair, eds. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Science, Vol 10: Divorce, Separation, and Remarriage: The Transformation of Family. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 279–298.
  • Ganong, L.H., et al. 2012. Communication Technology and Postdivorce Coparenting. Family Relations, 61 (3), 397–409. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00706.x.
  • Greenhalgh, J. and Manzano, A., 2022. Understanding ‘Context’ in Realist Evaluation and Synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25 (5), 583–595. doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1918484.
  • Hardesty, J.L., et al. 2017. Coparenting Relationship Trajectories: Marital Violence Linked to Change and Variability After Separation. Journal of Family Psychology, 31 (7), 844–854. doi:10.1037/fam0000323.
  • Harris, B. and Woodlock, D., 2019. Digital Coercive Control: Insights from Two Landmark Domestic Violence Studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59 (3), 530–550. doi:10.1093/bjc/azy052.
  • Harris, B. and Woodlock, D., 2022. Spaceless Violence: Women’s Experiences of Technology-Facilitated Domestic Violence in Regional, Rural and Remote Areas. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 644, 14. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. Available from: https://doi.org/10.52922/ti78405
  • Light, B., Burgess, J., and Duguay, S., 2018. The Walkthrough Method: An Approach to the Study of Apps. New Media & Society, 20 (3), 881–900. doi:10.1177/1461444816675438.
  • Lupton, D., 2014. Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps. Societies, 4 (4), 606–622. doi:10.3390/soc4040606.
  • Maher, J., McCulloch, J., and Fitz-Gibbon, K., 2017. New Forms of Gendered Surveillance? Intersections of Technology and Family Violence. In: M. Segrave and L. Vitis, eds. Gender, Technology and Violence. London: Routledge, 14–27.
  • Markham, M.S., et al. 2017. Communication Among Parents Who Share Physical Custody After Divorce or Separation. Journal of Family Issues, 38 (10), 1414–1442. doi:10.1177/0192513X15616848.
  • Markwick, K., et al. 2019. Technology and Family Violence in the Context of Post‐separated Parenting. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 40 (1), 143–162. doi:10.1002/anzf.1350.
  • Pawson, R., 2013. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N., 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
  • Payne, J.L., et al., 2022. Family Law Professionals’ Views of Post-Separation Parenting Apps. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 36 (1). doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebac029
  • QSR International Pty Ltd., 2019. NVivo 12.6.1.970 [software]. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home [Accessed 26 April].
  • Quehl, K., 2017. Divorce in the Digital Age. Unpublished thesis. Indiana University.
  • Smyth, B.M., et al. in press. Popular Post-Separation Parenting Smartphone Apps: An Evaluation. Family Court Review. 61 (3).
  • Smyth, B.M., Ainscough, G., and Payne, J.L., 2020. Modes of Communication Between High-Conflict Separated Parents: Exploring the Role of Media Multiplexity and Modality Switching. Journal of Family Communication, 20 (3), 189–205. doi:10.1080/15267431.2020.1754826.
  • Smyth, B. and Fehlberg, B., 2019. Australian Post-Separation Parenting on the Smartphone: What’s ‘App-Ening? The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 41 (1), 53–71. doi:10.1080/09649069.2019.1554793.
  • Woodlock, D., 2017. The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking. Violence Against Women, 23 (5), 584–602. doi:10.1177/1077801216646277.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.