Smoke and mirrors? Regulation 12 and access to legal aid for victims of domestic abuse

References

• Amnesty International, 2016. Cuts That Hurt: The Impact of Legal Aid Cuts in England on Access to Justice. London: Amnesty International UK. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur45/4936/2016/en/
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, C., 2014. Data protection, safeguarding and the protection of children’s privacy: exploring local authority guidance on parental photography at school events. Information & communications technology law, 23 (3), 256–272. doi:10.1080/13600834.2014.973178.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusgil, S. and Kirk, L., 1998. Mail survey response behaviour: a conceptualisation of motivating factors and an empirical study. European journal of marketing, 32 (11/12), 1165–1192. doi:10.1108/03090569810243776.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry, S. and Herring, J., 2017. A human right to legal aid? – the implications of changes to the legal aid scheme for victims of domestic abuse. Journal of social welfare and family law, 39 (2), 152–167. doi:10.1080/09649069.2017.1306344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., 1998. The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• DS v AC [2023] EWFC 46
   Google Scholar
• Durfee, A., 2009. Victim narratives, legal representation and domestic violence civil protection orders. Feminist criminology, 4 (1), 7–31. doi:10.1177/1557085108324961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, D., 2018. Priced Out of Justice: Means Testing Legal Aid and Making Ends Meet Loughborough: Centre for Research in Social Policy, Loughborough University. Available from: https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/report/Priced_out_of_justice_Means_testing_legal_aid_and_making_ends_meet/9470897
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, D., 2022. More affordable justice: proposals to reform the legal aid means tests and implications for living standards. Loughborough: Centre for Research in Social Policy, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, C. and Thiara, R., 2003. Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of social welfare and family law, 25 (3), 195–214. doi:10.1080/0964906032000145948.
   Google Scholar
• The Law Society, 2018. Research into the Impact of the Legal Aid Capital and Contribution Thresholds for Victims of Domestic Violence. London: The Law Society. Available from: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/research/impact-of-legal-aid-thresholds-for-victims-of-domestic-violence
   Google Scholar
• The Law Society, 2022. Law society’s response to the government’s consultation on the review of the legal aid means test. London: The Law Society.
   Google Scholar
• Legal Aid Agency, 2021a. Apply for Legal Aid: Guidance. London: Legal Aid Agency. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/apply-for-legal-aid
   Google Scholar
• Legal Aid Agency, 2021b. Civil Representation: Lord Chancellor’s Guidance on Determining Financial Eligibility for Certified Work (April 2021). London: Legal Aid Agency. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1045682/Lord_Chancellor_s_guidance_on.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Legal Aid Agency, 2022. Directory of legal aid providers. London: Legal Aid Agency. Available from: Directory of providers GOV.UK.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, E. and Rourke, D., 2022. ‘Trapped capital’ and Financial Eligibility for Legal Aid. London, Public Law Project. Available from: https://publiclawproject.org.uk/content/uploads/2022/04/Trapped-capital-FINAL_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2021. Civil detailed data spreadsheet. obtained by email from the ministry of justice on 8, November. London: Ministry of Justice. The spreadsheet can be accessed by contacting the authors directly.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2022. Legal Aid Means Test Review. London: Ministry of Justice. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/legal-aid-means-test-review/legal-aid-means-test-review
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and National Statistics, 2022. Family Court Statistics Quarterly: Accessible Family Court Tables. London: Ministry of Justice and National Statistics. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-april-to-june-2022
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C., 2012. Sport in care: using freedom of information requests to elicit data about looked after children’s involvement in physical activity. The British Journal of Social Work, 43 (7), 1347–1363. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organ, J. and Sigafoos, J., 2018. The impact of LASPO on routes to justice. Equality and Human Rights Commission: England, Research Report 118, 14 August 2021. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/the-impact-of-laspo-on-routes-to-justice-september-2018.Pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., 2017. The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: a literature review. Journal of Education & Learning, 6 (1), 102–112. doi:10.5539/jel.v6n1p102.
   Google Scholar
• R (GR) v Director of Legal Aid Casework [2020] EWHC 3140 (Admin).
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., et al., 2021. Covid-19 and the Family Courts: Key Practitioner Findings in Children Cases. Journal of social welfare and family law, 43 (4), 414–438. 10.1080/09649069.2021.1996079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rights of Women, 2022. Response to the Consultation on the Legal Aid Means Test Review. London: Rights of Women. Available from: https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Rights-of-Women-Response-to-Legal-Aid-Means-Test-Review-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Speed, A., 2021. Clinical legal education as an effective tool for improving the accessibility of protective injunctions for victims of domestic abuse: a case study example of the models of support available at northumbria university. International journal of clinical legal education, 28 (2), 66–116. doi:10.19164/ijcle.v28i2.1184.
   Google Scholar
• Speed, A., 2022. Domestic abuse and the provision of advocacy services: mapping support for victims in family proceedings in england and wales. Journal of social welfare and family law, 44 (3), 347–368. doi:10.1080/09649069.2022.2126605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speed, A. and Richardson, K., 2022. ‘Should i stay or should i go now? If i go there will be trouble and if i stay it will be double’ an examination into the present and future of protective orders regulating the family home in England and wales. The journal of criminal law, 86 (3), 179–205. doi:10.1177/00220183211073639.
   Google Scholar
• Surviving Economic Abuse, 2021. Denied justice: how the legal aid means test prevents victims of domestic abuse from accessing justice and rebuilding their lives. London: Surviving Economic Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., et al., 2014. Litigants in Person in Private Family Law Cases. London: Ministry of Justice. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380479/litigants-in-person-in-private-family-law-cases.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Teijlingen, E. and Hundley, V., 2001. The Importance of Pilot Studies. University of Surrey Social Research Update. University of Surrey. Available from: https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/10149/1/SRU35_pilot_studies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B., 2005. Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10 (3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar