References
- Aloni, E., 2013. Registering Relationships. Tulane Law Review, 87 (3), 573–648.
- Anapol, D.M., 1997. Polyamory: The New Love without Limits: Secrets of Sustainable Intimate Relationships. Rev. ed. San Rafael: Intinet Resource Center.
- Arbitrio, M.M. and Dibbini, M.A., 2022. NY Court Tackles Polyamorous Relationship [Online]. Wood Smith Henning Berman. Available from: https://www.wshblaw.com/publication-ny-court-tackles-polyamorous-relationship
- Atkin, B., 2008. The Legal World of Unmarried Couples: Reflections on “De Facto Relationships” in Recent New Zealand Legislation. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 39 (4), 793–812. doi:10.26686/vuwlr.v39i4.5492.
- Aviram, H. and Leachman, G., 2015. The Future of Polyamorous Marriage Lessons from the Marriage Equality Struggle. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 38, 269–336. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2485853
- Bailey, M., 2004. Regulation of Cohabitation and Marriage in Canada. Law and Policy, 26 (1), 153–175. doi:10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00166.x.
- Bakht, N. and Collins, L., 2018. Are You My Mother? Parentage in a Nonconjugal Family. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 31 (1), 105–149.
- Baldacci, P., 1994. Pushing the Law to Encompass the Reality of Our Families: Protecting Lesbian and Gay Families from Eviction from Their Homes - Braschi’s Functional Definition of “Family” and Beyond. Fordham Law Journal, 21 (4), 973–982.
- Barbosa, L., 6 October 2022. Polyamorous Relationships Deserve Equal Legal Protections, Rules NY Judge. GCN. Available from: https://gcn.ie/polyamorous-relationships-equal-legal-protections-ny/
- Barker, N., 2016. Rethinking Conjugality As the Basis for Family Recognition: A Feminist Rewriting of the Judgment in Burden V. United Kingdom. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6 (6), 1249–1275.
- Barker, M. and Langdridge, D., 2010. Whatever Happened to Non-Monogamies? Critical Reflections on Recent Research and Theory. Sexualities, 13 (6), 748–772. doi:10.1177/1363460710384645.
- Billson, C., 2022. New York Judge Rules Polyamorous Relationships Deserve Legal Protection, Just Like Every Other. Pink News, 5 October. Available from: https://www.thepinknews.com/2022/10/05/new-york-judge-rules-polyamorous-relationships-deserve-legal-protection-just-like-every-other/
- Brewster, M.E., et al. 2017. A Content Analysis of Scholarship on Consensual Nonmonogamies: Methodological Roadmaps, Current Themes, and Directions for Future Research. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 6 (1), 32–47. doi:10.1037/cfp0000074.
- Bundesministerium der Justiz, 2024. Eckpunkte des Bundesministeriums der Justiz für die Verantwortungsgemeinschaft [online]. Bundesministerium der Justiz. Available from: https://www.bmj.de/DE/themen/gesellschaft_familie/ehe_nichteheliche_gemeinschaft/verantwortungsgemeinschaft/Eckpunkte/eckpunkte_node.html
- Case, M.A., 2021. The Status of Marriage. National Taiwan University Law Review, 16 (2), 187–250. doi:10.53106/181263242021121602004.
- Catholic News Agency (CNA) Staff, 2022. New York Judge Paves Way for Recognition of ‘Multi-Person relationships’. Catholic News Agency, 10 October. Available from: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/252514/new-york-judge-paves-way-recognition-multi-person-relationships
- Chauncey, G., 2004. The History Shaping Today’s Debate Over Gay Equality. New York: Basic Books.
- Croce, M. and Swennen, F., 2021. Cont(r)actualisation: A Politics of Transformative Legal Recognition of Adult Unions. Social & Legal Studies, 30 (2), 230–250. doi:10.1177/0964663920914064.
- Diduck, A., 2008. Introduction. In: A. Diduck, ed. Marriage and Cohabitation: Regulating Intimacy, Affection and Care. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Draghici, C., 2018. Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Strasbourg Proceedings: A Misconstrued Approach to ‘Family Life’. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 32 (1), 42–62. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebx018.
- Emens, E., 2004. Monogamy’s Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 29, 277–377. doi:10.2139/ssrn.506242
- Ertman, M.M., 2005. The Business of Intimacy: Bridging the Private-Private Distinction. In: M.A. Fineman and T. Dougherty, eds. Feminism Confronts Homo Economicus: Gender, Law, and Society. New York: Cornell University Press, 467–500.
- Ettelbrick, P., 1996. Wedlock Alert: A Comment on Lesbian and Gay Family Recognition. Journal of Law and Policy, 5 (1), 107–166. doi:10.1300/J041v05n01_07.
- Farabee, L.M., 1996. Comment, Marriage, Equal Protection, and New Judicial Federalism: A View from the States. Yale Law and Policy Review, 14 (1), 237–286.
- Fineman, M., 1995. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.
- Franke, K.M., 2008. Longing for Loving. Fordham Law Review, 76 (6), 2685–2707. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1096209.
- Garrison, M., 2008. Reviving Marriage: Could We? Should We? Journal of Law and Family Studies, 10 (2), 279–335.
- Goldfeder, M., 2017. Legalizing Plural Marriage: The Next Legal Frontier in Family Law. Massachusetts: Brandeis University Press.
- Grande, E. and Pes, L., 2018. Più cuori e una capanna: Il poliamore come istituzione. Torino: Giappichelli.
- Graycar, R. and Millbank, J., 2007. From Functional Family to Spinster Sisters: Australia’s Distinctive Path to Relationship Recognition. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 24 (1), 121–164.
- Griffiths, K., 2019. From ‘Form’ to Function and Back Again: A New Conceptual Basis for Developing Frameworks for the Legal Recognition of Adult Relationships. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 31 (3), 277–248.
- Gross, A., 2013. The Burden of Conjugality. In: E. Brems, ed. Diversity and European Human Rights: Rewriting Judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265–292.
- Hamilton, V., 2004. Mistaking Marriage for Social Policy. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 11, 307–371.
- Hasday, J.E., 2012. Siblings in Law. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65 (3), 897–931.
- Kaganas, F. and Piper, C., 2001. Grandparents and Contact: ‘Rights V Welfare’ Revisited. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15 (2), 250–275. doi:10.1093/lawfam/15.2.250.
- Klein, D.J., 2012. Plural Marriage and Community Property Law. Golden Gate University Law Review, 41 (1), 33–89.
- Law Commission of Canada, 2001. Beyond Conjugality: Recognizing and Supporting Close Personal Adult Relationships.
- Law Commission Te Aka Matua o te Ture, 2019. Review of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (Report 143 2019) (NZ).
- Lepore, S.M., 9 October 2022. NYC Judge Rules That THROUPLES Have Same Legal Protections As Couples: Rules Man Can Take Over Lease of Late boyfriend’s Rent-Stabilized Apartment - Despite Deceased Lover Being Married. Dailymail. Available from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11295441/NYC-judge-rules-THROUPLES-legal-protections-couples.html
- Levit, N., 2000. A Different Kind of Sameness: Beyond Formal Equality and Antisubordination Strategies in Gay Legal Theory. Ohio State Law Journal, 61, 867–934.
- Lind, G., 2008. Common Law Marriage: A Legal Institution for Cohabitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Looking for a Family Resemblance: The Limits of the Functional Approach to the Legal Definition of Family. 1991. Harvard Law Review, 104 (7), 1640–1659. 10.2307/1341599.
- Magaletti, D., 2022. Judge Rules Polyamorous Relationships Are Entitled to Same Protections as Two-Person Relationships. Star Observer, 10 October. Available from: https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/judge-rules-polyamorous-relationships-are-entitled-to-same-protections-as-two-person-relationships/217201.
- Matsumura, K.T., 2022. Beyond Polygamy. Iowa Law Review, 107 (5), 1903–1962.
- Millbank, J., 2008. The Limits of Functional Family: Lesbian Mother Litigation in the Era of the Eternal Biological Family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 22 (2), 149–177. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn001.
- Morgan, K., 2023. Throuple Trouble – an Analysis of Mead V Paul [online]. Lewis Layers. Available from: https://lewislawyers.co.nz/throuple-trouble-an-analysis-of-mead-v-paul/
- Munson, M. and Stelboum, J., 1999. The Lesbian Polyamory Reader Open Relationships, Non-Monogamy, and Casual Sex. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
- Musto, J., 2022. NYC Judge Rules Polyamorous Unions Entitled to Same Legal Protections as 2-Person Relationships [online]. New York Post. Available from: https://nypost.com/2022/10/08/nyc-judge-rules-in-favor-of-polyamorous-relationships/
- Ng, M., 2022. Rethinking ‘Family’ in Family Law: Form-Based, Function-Based and Choice-Based Frameworks [online]. LSE Law Review Blog. Available from: https://blog.lselawreview.com/2022/03/05/rethinking-family-in-family-law-form-based-function-based-and-choice-based-frameworks/
- Owen, G., 2 October 2022. New York Judge Rules in Favor of Polyamorous Relationships. Lgbtqnation. Available from: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/10/new-york-judge-rules-favor-polyamorous-relationships/
- Palazzo, N., 2018. The Strange Pairing: Building Alliances Between Queer Activists and Conservative Groups to Recognize New Families. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, 25 (2), 161–237. doi:10.36641/mjgl.25.2.strange.
- Palazzo, N. 2021. Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe. Oxford: Hart.
- Palazzo, N., 2024. Non-Conjugal Couples and Legislated Cohabitation. In: M. Briggs and A. Hayward, eds. Family Property and the Law (Research Handbooks in Family Law Series. 2024 Forthcoming. Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar, 176–195.
- Palazzo, N. and Kornet, N., 2023. A Closer Link: Recent Trends on Registered Partnerships and Contemporary Families in Europe. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 35 (3), 272–304. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4731692.
- Parkinson, P., 2017. Reconsidering Family Property Law in the Post-Marital Age. In: J. Palmer, N. Peart, M. Briggs, and M. Henaghan, eds. Law and Policy in Modern Family Finance: Property Division in the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Intersentia, 15–36.
- Ritchie, A. and Barker, M., 2006. ‘There Aren’t Words for What We Do or How We Feel so We Have to Make Them Up’: Constructing Polyamorous Languages in a Culture of Compulsory Monogamy. Sexualities, 9 (5), 584–601. doi:10.1177/1363460706069987.
- Rosenbury, L.A., 2016. Friends with Benefits? Michigan Law Review, 106 (2), 189–242.
- Scott, E.S. and Cahn, N. 2021. The 100-Year Life and the New Family Law. University of Virginia School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Paper No. 2021–08; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14–68 [online]. Available from: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3740&context=faculty_scholarship
- Scott, E.S. and Cahn, N., 2023. Family Law for the One-Hundred-Year Life. The Yale Law Journal, 132 (6), 1691–1768.
- Sheff, E., 2014. The Polyamorists Next Door: Inside Multiple-Partner Relationships and Families. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD. doi:10.1177/1363460715583453.
- Shih, N., 2023. New York Civil Court Judge Breaks Precedent Regarding Polyamorous Relationships [online]. Columbia Undergraduate Law Review. Available from: https://www.culawreview.org/current-events-2/new-york-civil-court-judge-breaks-precedent-regarding-polyamorous-relationships
- Volokh, E., 24 September 2022. In Sum, the Problem with [The Same-Sex Marriage Cases] Is That They Recognize Only Two-Person Relationships. Reason. Available from: https://reason.com/volokh/2022/09/24/in-sum-the-problem-with-the-same-sex-marriage-cases-is-that-they-recognize-only-two-person-relationships/
- Wright, R., 2022. Polyamorous Rights Are Civil Rights, NYC Court Rules [online]. Queer Majority. Available from: https://www.queermajority.com/essays-all/polyamorous-rights-are-civil-rights-nyc-court-rules