An action research study designed to implement student negotiation to improve speaking classroom practice in Turkey

References

• Altay, M. 2004. “An Investigation into the Effects of Task-based and Topic-Based Activities on the Participation of Advanced Learners of English in Speaking Lessons.” MA diss., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L. 2011. “Teachers as ‘Reform-Doers’: Developing a Participatory Curriculum to Teach English as a Foreign Language.” Educational Action Research 19 (4): 417–432.10.1080/09650792.2011.625654
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D., A. Pavese, A. Velázquez, and S. M. Vélez. 2013. “Teacher Professional Development through Collaborative Action Research: Impact on Foreign English-Language Teaching and Learning.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 185–201.10.1080/09650792.2013.789717
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2006. Teacher Cognition and Language Education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, M. P., and A. Littlejohn. 2000. “The Practicalities of Negotiation.” In Classroom Decision-making: Negotiation and Process Syllabuses in Practice, edited by M. P. Breen and A. Littlejohn, 272–295. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2010a. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2010b. “Action Research.” In Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, edited by B. Paltridge and A. Phakiti, 80–97. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, M. 2000. “Self-reported Needs of EFL Students in Terms of Linguistic Skills.” H. U. Journal of Education 19: 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. L. 1962. “The Hawthorne Effect in Educational Research.” The Phi Delta Kappan 44 (3): 116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandal, J. 1999. “Cooperative Language Learning and Affective Factors.” In Affect in Language Learning, edited by J. Arnold, 226–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirtaş, İ., and N. Sert. 2010. “English Education at University Level: Who is at the Centre of the Learning Process?” Novitas-Royal 4 (2): 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Diab, N. M. 2008. “The Effects of Peer- versus Self-Editing on Learner Autonomy in ESL Writing.” EdD diss., University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, L. 1987. Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, C., and R. J. Cameron. 1995. “Learning about Learning: Metacognitive Approaches in the Classroom.” Educational Psychology in Practice 11 (2): 15–23.10.1080/0266736950110203
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 1994. “Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 78 (3): 273–284.10.1111/modl.1994.78.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbutt, D. 1985. “Educational Action Research: Some General Concerns and Specific Quibbles.” In Issues in Educational Research, edited by R. Burgess, 152–174. Lewes: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, K. 2005. Designing Language Courses: A Guide for Teachers. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, H. M., and T. Austin. 2004. Content-based Second Language Teaching and Learning: An Interactive Approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer, J. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. 2010. English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K., M. B. Horwitz, and J. Cope. 1986. “Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety.” The Modern Language Journal 70 (2): 125–132.10.1111/modl.1986.70.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaçar, I. G., and B. Zengin. 2009. “İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenlerin Dil Öğrenme Ile İlgili İnançları, Öğrenme Yöntemleri, Dil Öğrenme Amaçları Ve Öncelikleri Arasındaki İlişki: Öğrenci Boyutu.” Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies 5 (1): 55–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kebir, C. 1994. “An Action Research Look at the Communication Strategies of Adult Learners.” TESOL Journal 4 (1): 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E., and S. T. Warner. 1988. Conversation Gambits: Real English Conversation Practices. Hove, UK: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, F. 1984. Keep Talking: Communicative Fluency Activities for Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. 1991. Learner Autonomy: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. 1992. Teaching Oral Communication: A Methodological Framework. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, W. 2009. “An Application of the Triarchic Theory of Intelligence to Students of English in a Taiwanese University: Reflections of an Action Research.” EdD diss., Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Louma, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733017
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., and P. Gao. 2010. “Promoting Learner Autonomy through Developing Process Syllabus–Syllabus Negotiation: The Basis of Learner Autonomy.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1 (6): 901–908.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., H. Demetriou, J. Ruddock, and K. Myers. 2003. Consulting Pupils: A Toolkit for Teachers. Cambridge: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. L. 2006. Researching Second Language Classrooms. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., P. Lomax, and J. Whitehead. 1996. You and Your Action Research Project. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203281291
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1992. Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1980. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, M. 2011. “Creating a Dialogical and Critical Classroom: Reflection and Action to Improve Practice.” Educational Action Research 19 (3): 327–343.10.1080/09650792.2011.600607
   Google Scholar
• Ruddock, J., and D. McIntyre. 2007. Improving Learning through Consulting Pupils. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro, R., and S. Hillyard. 2004. Global Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherab, K. 2013. “Strategies for Encouraging Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement of Pre-Service Student-teachers in Bhutan: An Action Research Case Study.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 164–184.10.1080/09650792.2013.789710
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1985. “Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development.” In Input in Second Language Acquisition, edited by S. M. Gass and C. Madden, 235–253. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Talim Terbiye Kurulu. 2006. English Language Curriculum for Primary Education. Ankara: MEB.
   Google Scholar
• Tarone, E. 2005. “Speaking in a Second Language.” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by E. Hinkel, 485–502. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tsafos, V. 2009. “Teacher-student Negotiation in an Action Research Project.” Educational Action Research 17 (2): 197–211.10.1080/09650790902914175
   Google Scholar
• Ur, P. 1981. Discussions That Work: Task-Centred Fluency Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ur, P. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., and E. Schoenfelder. 2006. “Classroom Effects on Student Motivation: Goal Structures, Social Relationship and Competence Beliefs.” Journal of School Psychology 44 (5): 331–349.10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. J. 1998. Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willams, M., and R. L. Burden. 1997. Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, X. 2010. “Why Are Students Quiet? Looking at the Chinese Context and beyond.” ELT Journal 64 (1): 10–20.10.1093/elt/ccp060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., and K. Head. 2010. “Dealing with Learner Reticence in Speaking Class.” ELT Journal 64 (1): 1–9.10.1093/elt/ccp018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar