Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 24, 2016 - Issue 4
385
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A programme for future audit professionals: using action research to nurture student engagement

, &
Pages 598-616 | Received 01 Jul 2014, Accepted 03 Sep 2015, Published online: 02 Nov 2015

References

  • Adler, R. M. 1998. “The Challenges of Learner-centered Education.” Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand 77 (1): 12–17.
  • Allen, R. D. 2005. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Auditor Error Projection Decisions.” Auditing 24 (2): 69–84.10.2308/aud.2005.24.2.69
  • American Association Accounting. 1986. “Committee on the Future Structure, Content, and Scope of Accounting Education (the Bedford Committee). 1986. Future Accounting Education: Preparing for the Expanding Profession.” Issues in Accounting Education 1 (1): 168–190.
  • Bevins, S., J. Jordan, and E. Perry. 2011. “Reflecting on Professional Development.” Educational Action Research 19 (3): 399–411.10.1080/09650792.2011.600643
  • Bonner, S. E. 1999. “Choosing Teaching Methods Based on Learning Objectives: An Integrative Framework.” Issues in Accounting Education 14 (1): 11–15.10.2308/iace.1999.14.1.11
  • Bosworth, K. 1994. “Developing Collaborative Skills in College Students.” In Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, edited by K. Bosworth and S. Hamilton. San Francisco: Joseey-Bass.
  • Braun, R. L., and H. E. Davis. 2003. “Computer‐Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques: Analysis and Perspectives.” Managerial Auditing Journal 18 (9): 725–731.10.1108/02686900310500488
  • Burke, A. 2011. “Group Work: How to Use Groups Effectively.” The Journal of Effective Teaching 11 (2): 87–95.
  • Coetzee, G. P., and R. D. Bruyn. 2003. “The Benefit of Introducing Audit Software into Curricula for Computer Auditing Students: A Student Perspective from the University of Pretoria.” South African Journal of Higher Education 17 (2): 21–30.
  • Coglitore, F. J., and D. M. Matson. 2007. “The Use of Computer-assisted Auditing Techniques in the Auditing Course: Further Evidence.” Journal of Forensic Accounting 8: 201–226.
  • Cordingly, P., M. Bell B. Rundell, and D. Evans. 2005. “The Impact of Collaborative Continuing Professional Development (CPD) on Classroom Teaching and Learning”. Obtained from wsassets.S3.amazonws.com on 30 October 2014.
  • Csernica, J., M. Hanyka, D. Hyde, S. Shooter, M. Toole, and M. Vigeant. 2002. Practical Guide to Teamwork, Version 1.1. Bucknell University: College of Engineering.
  • Davies, M. 2000. “Using a Computerised Case Study to Teach Computer Auditing: The Reasons, the Approach and the Student Response.” Managerial Auditing Journal 15 (5): 247–252.10.1108/02686900010339517
  • Davis, B. G. 1999. “Cooperative Learning: Students Working in Small Groups”. Speaking of Teaching, 10 (2): Stanford, CA: Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching.
  • Debreceny, R., S. W. Leo, W. Neo, and J. S. Toh. 2005. “Employing Generalised Audit Software in the Financial Services Sector: Challenges and Opportunities.” Managerial Auditing Journal 20 (6): 605–618.
  • Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press
  • Esteves, J., and J. Pastor. 2004. “Using a Multimethod Approach to Research Enterprise Systems Implementations.” Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 2 (2): 69–82.
  • Fielding, M., and S. Bragg. 2003. Students as Researchers: Making a Difference (Consulting Pulils about Teaching and Learning. Cambridge UK: Pearson Education.
  • Financial Reporting Act. 2013. Wellington, New Zealand: Government Press.
  • Flint, D. 1988. The Philosophy and Principles of Auditing: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
  • Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74: 59–109.10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Gelinas, U. J., E. S. Levy, and J. C. Thibodeau. 2001. “Norwood Office Supplies Inc: A Teaching Case to Integrate Computer-assisted Auditing Techniques into the Auditing Course.” Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4): 603–636.10.2308/iace.2001.16.4.603
  • Grundy, S. 1982. “Three Modes of Action Research.” Curriculum Perspectives 2 (3): 23–34.
  • Harwell, S. H., S. Gunter, S. Montgomery and C. Shelton. 2001. “Technology Integration and the Classroom Learning Environment: Research for Action.” Learning Environments Research 4: 259–286.10.1023/A:1014412120805
  • Helliar, C., E. Monk, and L. Stevenson. 2009. “The Development of Trainee Auditors' Skills in Tertiary Education.” International Journal of Auditing 13: 185–202.10.1111/ijau.2009.13.issue-3
  • Hodgson, Y., R. Benson, and C. Brack. 2013. “Using Prediction Research to Improve Student Engagement in a Peer-assisted Learning Programme.” Educational Action Reaarch 21 (3): 359–375.10.1080/09650792.2013.813399
  • Howcroft, D. 2006. “Spreadsheets and the Financial Planning Process: A Case Study of Resistance to Change.” Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change 2 (3): 248–280.10.1108/18325910610690081
  • Järvelä, S., M. Veermans, and P. Leinonen. 2008. “Investigating Student Engagement in Computer-supported Inquiry: A Process-oriented Analysis.” Social Psychology of Education 11: 299–322.10.1007/s11218-007-9047-6
  • Johnson, E. N., J. Baird, P. Caster, W. N. Dilla, C. Earley, and T. Louwers. 2003. “Challenges to Audit Education for the 21st Century: A Survey of Curricula, Course Content, and Delivery Methods.” Issues in Accounting Education 18 (3): 241–263.
  • Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. 3rd Edtn. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • Kidd, S. A., and M. J. Kral. 2005. “Practicing Participatory Action Research.” Journal of Counselling Psychology 52 (2): 187–195.10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187
  • Kiener, M., K. H. Ahuna, and C. G. Tinnesz. 2014. “Documenting Critical Thinking in a Capstone Course: Moving Students toward a Professional Disposition.” Educational Action Research 22 (1): 109–121.10.1080/09650792.2013.856770
  • Kirkwood, M. 2001. “The Contribution of Curriculum Development to Teachers’ Professional Development: A Scottish Case Study.” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 17: 5–28.
  • Kuruppu, N. 2012. “A Structured Pedagogy for Integrating Generalized Audit Softward into the Auditing Curriculum.” Business Education and Accreditation 4 (1): 113–122.
  • Laurillard, D. 1984. “Learning from Problem Solving.” In The Experience of Learning, edited by F. Marton, D. Hounsell and N. Entwistle, 124–143. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • Leitch, R., and C. Day. 2000. “Action Research and Reflective Practice: Towards a Holistic View.” Educational Action Research 8 (1): 179–193.10.1080/09650790000200108
  • Lippincott, B., and T. Pergola. 2009. “Use of a Job Cost Simulation to Engage Gen Y Students.” Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies 15 (2): 97.
  • Marriott, P., and A. Lau. 2008. “The Use of on-line Summative Assessment in an Undergraduate Financial Accounting Course.” Journal of Accounting Education 26 (2): 73–90.10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.02.001
  • Matherly, M., M. W. Watson, and S. Ivancevich. 2009. “Implementing Generalized Audit Software in the Classroom.” AIS Educator Journal 4 (1): 27–57.
  • Mautz., R. K., and H. A. Sharaf. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. Monograph No. 6. New York: American Accounting Association.
  • McDuffie, R. S. and M. Smith. 2006. “Impact of an Audit Reporting Expert System on Learning Performance: A Teaching Note.” Accounting Education 15 (1): 89–102. 10.1080/06939280600551585
  • Menda, R. 2004. “The Role of a Manufacturing Audit in Crafting the Production System.” International Journal of Production Management 24 (9): 929–943.10.1108/01443570410552126
  • Mo, S. 2011. “Evidence on Instructional Technology and Student Engagement in an Auditing Course”. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(4):149–158.
  • Moultrie, J., P. J. Clarkson, and D. Probert. 2006. “A Tool to Evaluate Design Performance in SMEs.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55 (3/4): 184–216.10.1108/17410400610653192
  • Neely, A., H. Richards, J. Mills, K. Platts, and M. Bourne. 1997. “Designing Performance Measures: A Structured Approach.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 17 (11): 1131–1152.10.1108/01443579710177888
  • Nieschwietz, R., K. Pany, and J. Zhang. 2002. “Auditing with Technology: Using Generalized Audit Software in the Classroom.” Journal of Accounting Education 20: 307–329.10.1016/S0748-5751(02)00011-8
  • Postholm, M. B., and S. Skrøvset. 2013. “The Researcher Reflecting on Her Own Role during Action Research.” Educational Action Research 21 (4): 106–118.
  • Pratt, M. J., and K. A. Van Peursem 1993. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Auditing.” Accounting Education 2 (1): 11–32.10.1080/09639289300000002
  • Salm, T. 2013. “Action Research to Improve Collaboration among Student Support Services Teams.” Educational Action Research 22 (1): 93–108
  • Schön, D. 1995. “The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology.” Change 27 (6): 169–186.
  • Shaw, S., and D. Fairhurst. 2008. “Engaging a New Generation of Graduates.” Education and Training 50 (5): 366–378.
  • Solomon, E., and K. Troutman. 2003. “Experimental Judgement and Decision Research in Uditing: The First 25 Years of AOS.” Accounting, Organisations, and Society 28 (4): 179–187.
  • Thompson, A. D., M. R. Simonson, and C. P Hargrave. 1996. Education Technology: A Review of the Research (2nd Ed.): Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Van Peursem, K. A., and A. Julian. 2006. “Ethics Research: An Accounting Educator’s Perspective.” Australian Accounting Review 16 (1): 165–174.
  • Van Peursem, K. A., and M. J. Pratt. 2011. Auditing: Theory and Practice in New Zealand. Auckland: Pearson Education.
  • Weidenmier, M. L., and T. L. Herron. 2004. “Selecting an Audit Software Package for Classroom Use.” Journal of Information Systems 18 (1): 95.10.2308/jis.2004.18.1.95
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. 1992. Action Research in Higher Education. London, UK: Kogan Page.
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O., and M. Farquahar. 2002. “Action Learning, Action Research and Process Management.” The Learning Organisation 9 (3): 102–113.10.1108/09696470210428822

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.