Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 24, 2016 - Issue 4
1,534
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A new model of collaborative action research; theorising from inter-professional practice development

, &
Pages 519-534 | Received 25 Aug 2015, Accepted 15 Oct 2015, Published online: 26 Nov 2015

References

  • Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bevins, S. C., and G. Price. 2014. “Collaboration between Academics and Teachers: A Complex Relationship.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 270–284.10.1080/09650792.2013.869181
  • Briggs, Ann R. J. 2007. “The Use of Modelling for Theory Building in Qualitative Analysis.” British Educational Research Journal 33 (4): 589–603.10.1080/01411920701434102
  • Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical. Lewes: Falmer Press.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Cook, T. 1998. “The Importance of Mess in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 6 (1): 93–109.10.1080/09650799800200047
  • Cook, T. 2009. “The Purpose of Mess in Action Research: Building Rigour through a Messy Turn.” Educational Action Research 17 (2): 277–291.10.1080/09650790902914241
  • David, A. 2001. “Models Implementation: A State of the Art.” European Journal of Operational Research 134: 459–480.10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00269-1
  • Ellis, V., and J. McNicholl. 2015. Transforming Teacher Education. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Engeström, Y. 2004. “New Forms of Learning in Co-Configuration Work.” Journal of Workplace Learning 16 (1/2): 11–21.10.1108/13665620410521477
  • Eraut, M. 2007. “Learning from Other People in the Workplace.” Oxford Review of Education 33 (4): 403–422.10.1080/03054980701425706
  • Eriksson, D. M. 2003. “A Framework for the Constitution of Modelling Processes: A Proposition.” European Journal of Operational Research 145: 202–215.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00390-3
  • Fenwick, T. 2007. “Organisational Learning in the “Knots”. Discursive Capacities Emerging in a School-University Collaboration.” Journal of Educational Administration 45 (2): 138–153.10.1108/09578230710732934
  • Flyberg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gröschner, A., T. Seidel, K. Keimer, and A. Pehmer. 2015. “Through the Lens of Teacher Professional Development Components: The ‘Dialogic Video Cycle’ as an Innovative Program to Foster Classroom Dialogue.” Professional Development in Education 41 (4): 729–756.10.1080/19415257.2014.939692
  • Hammersley, M. 2003. “Can and Should Educational Research Be Educative?” Oxford Review of Education 29 (1): 3–25.10.1080/03054980307433
  • Hammersley, M. 2004. “Action Research: A Contradiction in Terms?” Oxford Review of Education 30 (2): 165–181.10.1080/0305498042000215502
  • Heikkinen, H. L. T., R. Huttunen, and L. Syrjälä. 2007. “Action Research as Narrative: Five Principles for Validation.” Educational Action Research. 15 (1): 5–19.10.1080/09650790601150709
  • Heikkinen, H. L. T., R. Huttunen, L. Syrjälä, and J. Pesonen. 2012a. “Action Research and Narrative Inquiry: Five Principles for Validation Revisited.” Educational Action Research. 20 (1): 5–21.10.1080/09650792.2012.647635
  • Heikkinen, H. L. T., H. Jokinen, and P. Tynjala. 2012b. Chapter 1. “Teacher Education and Development as Lifelong and Lifewide Learning.” In Peer-Group Mentoring for Teacher Development, edited by H. L. T. Heikkinen, H. Jokinen, and P. Tynjala, 3–30. London: Routledge.
  • Humes, W. 2014. “The Possibilities and Limitations of Practitioner Enquiry.” Education Today 64 (4): 3–7.
  • Kemmis, S. 1993. “Chapter 12: Action Research.” In Educational Research: Current Issues, edited by M. Hammersley, 177–190. London: The Open University, Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Kennedy, A. 2014. “Understanding Continuing Professional Development: The Need for Theory to Impact on Policy and Practice.” Professional Development in Education 40 (5): 688–697.10.1080/19415257.2014.955122
  • Kennedy, H., M. Landor, and L. Todd, eds. 2011. Video Interaction Guidance: A Relationship-Based Intervention to Promote Attunement, Empathy and Wellbeing. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Kennedy, H., M. Landor, and L. Todd, eds. 2015. Video Enhanced Reflective Practice: Professional Development through Attuned Interactions. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
  • Laing, K., and L. Todd, eds. 2015. Theory-Based Methodology: Using Theories of Change in Educational Development, Research and Evaluation. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, Newcastle University.
  • Lash, S. 2003. “Reflexivity as Non-Linearity.” Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2): 49–57.10.1177/0263276403020002003
  • Lightfoot, S., and D. Frost. 2015. “The Professional Identity of Early Years Educators in England: Implications for a Transformative Approach to Continuing Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 41 (2): 401–418.10.1080/19415257.2014.989256
  • Lindsay, G., J. Dockrell, J. Law & S. Roulstone. 2012. Better Communication Research Programme: Improving Provision for Children and Young People with Speech, Language and Communication Needs. Department for Education, UK. Accessed July 17 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/219622/DFE-RR247-BCRP1.pdf
  • Lofthouse, R. 2014. “Engaging in Educational Research and Development through Teacher Practitioner Enquiry; a Pragmatic or Naïve Approach?” Education Today 64 (4): 13–19.
  • Lofthouse R. 2015. “Metamorphosis, Model-Making and Meaning; Developing Exemplary Knowledge for Teacher Education.” PhD thesis, University of Newcastle.
  • Lofthouse, R., E. Hall, and K. Wall. 2012. “Chapter 12: Practitioner Enquiry.” In Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management, edited by A. Briggs, M. Coleman, and M. Morrison, 170–187. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Lofthouse, R., D. Leat, and C. Towler 2010a. Improving Teacher Coaching in Schools; a Practical Guide. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
  • Lofthouse, R., D. Leat, C. Towler, E. Hall, and C. Cummings. 2010b. Improving Coaching: Evolution Not Revolution. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
  • Lofthouse, R., and U. Thomas. 2015. “Concerning Collaboration: Teachers’ Perspectives on Working in Partnerships to Develop Teaching Practices.” Professional Development in Education. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1053570.
  • Mockler, N. 2014. “When ‘Research Ethics’ Become ‘Everyday Ethics’: The Intersection of Inquiry and Practice in Practitioner Research.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 146–158.10.1080/09650792.2013.856771
  • Sachs, J. 2001. “Teacher Professional Identity: Competing Discourses, Competing Outcomes.” Journal of Education Policy 16 (2): 149–161.10.1080/02680930116819
  • Schutz, A. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, CT: CT, Yale University Press.
  • Shannon, D., P. Snyder, and T. McLaughlin. 2015. “Preschool Teachers’ Insights about Web-Based Self-Coaching versus on-Site Expert Coaching.” Professional Development in Education 41 (2): 290–309.10.1080/19415257.2014.986819
  • Thomson, P. 2015. “Action Research with/against Impact.” Educational Action Research 23 (3): 309–311.10.1080/09650792.2015.1062235
  • Vanassche, E., and G. Kletchermans. 2014. “Teacher Educators’ Professionalism in Practice: Positioning Theory and Personal Interpretative Framework.” Teaching and Teacher Education 44: 117–127.10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.006
  • Whitehead, J. 2015. “Educational Researchers and Their Living-Educational-Theories.” BERA. Accessed August 20 2015. https://www.bera.ac.uk/blog/educational-researchers-and-their-living-educational-theories

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.