Threshold concept theory as an enabling constraint: a facilitated practitioner action research study

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. 2005. “Variation and Commonality in Phenomenographic Research Methods.” Higher Education Research and Development 24 (4): 321–334.10.1080/07294360500284672
   Google Scholar
• Avgitidou, S. 2009. “Participation, Roles and Processes in a Collaborative Action Research Project: A Reflexive Account of the Facilitator.” Educational Action Research 17 (4): 585–600.10.1080/09650790903309441
   Google Scholar
• Baillie, C. 2011. “Threshold Capabilities: An Emerging Methodology to Locate Curricula Threshold.” Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, 4–7 October.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie, C. 2012. Engineering Thresholds: An Approach to Curriculum Renewal – Sample Workshop Booklet. http:www.ecm.uwa.edu.au/_data/assets/file0015/2244012/PP10-1607_UWA_Baillie_Final-Report_RESOURCE_samle-workshop-booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baxter Magolda, M. 2009. “Educating Students for Self-Authorship.” In The University and Its Disciplines, edited by C. Kreber, 143–156. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, P. 2010. “Threshold Concepts, Disciplinary Differences and Cross-Disciplinary Discourse.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives 7 (2): 53–72. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Zayed University.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. 2006. “An Introduction to Threshold Concepts.” Planet 17, December 2006: 4–5. http://www.gees.ac.uk/planet/p17/gc.pdf. 10.11120/plan.2006.00170004
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. 2008. “Threshold Concepts: Old Wine in New Bottles or New Forms of Transactional Curriculum Inquiry? “In Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines, edited by R. Land., J. H. F. Meyer, and J. Smith, 261–272. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2006. Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M., A. Lazarus, T. Calvano, K. Matthews, R. Hendel, B. B. Epstein, and G. Brosvic. 2002. “Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique Promotes Learning and Corrects Inaccurate First Responses.” The Psychological Record 52: 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M. 2014. “The Threshold Concept: A Brief Introduction and Bibliography.” http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 2010. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., J. Mitchell, N. Mockler, P. Ponte, and K. Rönnermann. 2013. Facilitating Practitioner Research: Developing Transformational Partnerships. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halai, N. 2011. “How Teachers Become Action Researchers in Pakistan: Emerging Patterns from a Qualitative Meta Synthesis.” Educational Action Research 19 (2): 201–214.10.1080/09650792.2011.569213
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, A., and M. Peter. 2014. “Mastering Threshold Concepts in Tertiary Education: ‘I Know Exactly What You Are Saying and I Can Understand It, but I Have Nowhere to Hook It’.” The Waikato Journal of Educational Research 19 (2): 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, A., M. Peter, J. Scott, and B. Cowie 2011. “Getting Stuck’ in Analogue Electronics: Threshold Concepts as an Explanatory Model.” European Journal of Engineering Education [ On-line]: 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.606500
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, A., M. Peter, J. Scott, and B. Cowie. 2014. “Students’ Perceptions of Travel through the Liminal Space: Lessons for Teaching.” In Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice. Proceedings of the National Academy’s sixth annual conference and the fourth biennial threshold concepts conference [E-publication], eds. C. O’Mahony, A. Buchanan, M. O’Rourke, and B. Higgs, 62–67. ISBN: 978-1-906642-59-4. http://www.nairtl.ie/
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. 2012. “The Process and Lessons Learned in Developing Interdisciplinary Threshold Concepts.” Fourth Biennial Conference on Threshold Concepts: From personal practice to communities of practice, Trinity College, Dublin, 28–29 June 2012. Threshold concepts: Book of Conference Abstracts. http://nairtl.ie/documents/bookofabstracts_online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, N., and P. Carmichael. 2009. “Threshold Concepts: A Point of Focus for Practitioner Research.” Active Learning in Higher Education 10 (2): 103–119. 10.1177/1469787409104785
   Google Scholar
• Jaipal, K., and C. Figg. 2011. “Collaborative Action Research Approaches Promoting Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers.” Educational Action Research 19 (1): 59–72.10.1080/09650792.2011.547688
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., B. Cowie, and E. Khoo. 2011. Exploring ELearning Practices across the Disciplines in a University Environment. Summary report on a Teaching and Learning Research Initiative funded research project. http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9276_summaryreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Land, R. 2011. “There Could Be Trouble Ahead: Using Threshold Concepts as a Tool of Analysis.” International Journal for Academic Development 16 (2): 175–178.10.1080/1360144X.2011.568747
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., G. Cousin, J. H. F. Meyer, and P. Davies. 2005. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (3): Implications for Course Design and Evaluation.” In Improving Student Learning − Diversity and Inclusivity, Proceedings of the 12th Improving Student Learning Conference, edited by C. Rust, 53–64. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD).
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2006. All You Need to Know about Action Research. London: Sage Publications. ISBN 1-4129-0806-X.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, E., and F. Rauch. 1995. “Dilemmas of Facilitating Action Research.” Educational Action Research 3 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1080/0965079950030104.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2003. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines.” In Improving Student Learning. Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice – 10 Years on, edited by C. Rust, 412–424. Oxford: OCSLD. http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/etl/docs/ETLreport4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2005. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistomological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.” Higher Education 49: 373–388.10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., R. Land, and P. Davies. 2006. “Implications of Threshold Concepts for Course Design and Evaluation.” In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, edited by J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land, 195–206. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., R. Land, and P. Davies. 2008. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (4): Issues of Variation and Variability.” In Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines, edited by R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer and J. Smith, 59–74. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Donnchadha, B. 2012. “Moving from Personal Practice to Communities of Reflective Practice: A Model for Professional Development.” Fourth Biennial Conference on Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice, Trinity College, Dublin, 28–29 June 2012. Threshold concepts: Book of Conference Abstracts. http://nairtl.ie/documents/bookofabstracts_online.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L. 2006. “Convergent, Divergent and Parallel Dialogues: Knowledge Construction in Professional Conversations.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (1): 13–31.10.1080/13450600500364547
   Google Scholar
• Peter, M., A. Harlow, J. Scott, D. McKie, M. Johnson, K. Moffatt, and A. McKim. 2014. Threshold Concepts: Impacts on Learning at the Tertiary Level. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. https://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/TLRI_Peter%26Harlow_Summary%28v3%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Platteel, T. 2010. Knowledge Development of Secondary School L1 Teachers on Concept-Context Rich Education in an Action-Research Setting. Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Postholm, M., and S. Skrovset. 2013. “The Researcher Reflecting on Her Own Role during Action Research.” Educational Action Research 21 (4): 506–518.10.1080/09650792.2013.833798
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, K., S. Male, C. Baillie, A. Stanboulis, J. Fill, and Z. Jaffer. 2013. “Methodological Challenges in Researching Threshold Concepts: A Comparative Analysis of Three Projects.” Higher Education 66: 585–601.10.1007/s10734-013-9623-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury, eds. 2008. The Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2014. “Forging the Jewels of the Curriculum: Educational Practice Inspired by a Thermodynamic Model of Threshold Concepts.” The Waikato Journal of Educational Research 19 (2): 115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., and A. Harlow. 2012. “Identification of Threshold Concepts Involved in Early Electronics: Some New Methods and Results.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 18 (1): 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., A. Harlow, and M. Peter. 2014. “Towards a TCT-Inspired Electronics Concept Inventory.” In Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice. Proceedings of the National Academy’s sixth annual conference and the fourth biennial threshold concepts conference [E-publication], edited by C. O’Mahony, A. Buchanan, M. O’Rourke, and B. Higgs, 113–117. ISBN: 978-1-906642-59-4. http://www.nairtl.ie/
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1999. Visions of the Possible: Models for Campus Support of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Comments made at meetings sponsored by the Carnegie Academy of Teaching and Learning. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/visions-ossible-models-campus-support-scolarship-teaching-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. 2001. Action Research: Facilitation and Implementation. A Monograph. Edmonton, AB: The Alberta Teachers’ Association. https://www.teachers.ab.ca/.../ATA/Publications/.../ActionResearch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, W. 2006. “Dynamic but Prosaic: A Methodology for Studying E/Learning Environments.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 29 (2): 151–163.10.1080/17437270600891556
   Google Scholar