Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based chemistry course

References

• American Chemical Society. 2015. Chemistry in Context (8th). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. 2007. “Inquiry as an Organizing Theme for Science Curricula.” In Handbook on Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. A. a. N. G. Lederman. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 807–830.
   Google Scholar
• Beerenwinkel, A., I. Parchmann, and C. Gräsel. 2010. “Conceptual Change Texts in Chemistry Teaching: A Study on the Particle Model of Matter.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (5): 1235–1259. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9257-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and J. Holman. 2003. “Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What Are They and What Are Their Effects?” Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice 17: 165–184. doi:10.1007/0-306-47977-x_8.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., F. Lubben, and S. Hogarth. 2007. “Bringing Science to Life: A Synthesis of the Research Evidence on the Effects of Context-Based and STS Approaches to Science Teaching.” Science Education 91 (3): 347–370. doi:10.1002/sce.20186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Bulte, A. M. W., H. B. Westbroek, O. de Jong, and A. Pilot. 2006. “A Research Approach to Designing Chemistry Education Using Authentic Practices as Contexts.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1063–1086. doi:10.1080/09500690600702520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1990. “Research on Teaching and Teacher Research: The Issues That Divide.” Educational Researcher 19 (2): 2–11. doi:10.3102/0013189x019002002.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1999. “The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later.” Educational Researcher 28 (7): 15–25. doi:10.3102/0013189x028007015.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Decristan, J., E. Klieme, M. Kunter, J. Hochweber, G. Büttner, B. Fauth, and I. Hardy. 2015. “Embedded Formative Assessment and Classroom Process Quality: How Do They Interact in Promoting Science Understanding?” American Educational Research Journal 52 (6): 1133–1159. doi:10.3102/0002831215596412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driel, v. L.. 2006. Professional Development within the School: A Study into the Improvement of Teaching Strategies in Classroom Practice. Utrecht: Eigen beheer.
   Google Scholar
• Eilks, I., and B. Byers. 2010. “The Need for Innovative Methods of Teaching and Learning Chemistry in Higher Education – Reflections from a Project of the European Chemistry Thematic Network.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 11 (4): 233–240. doi:10.1039/C0RP90004D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erratum. 2015. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 34 (2): 55. doi:10.1111/emip.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechner, S. 2009. Effects of Context-Oriented Learning on Student Interest and Achievement in Chemistry Education. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Filsecker, M., and M. Kerres. 2012. “Repositioning Formative Assessment from an Educational Assessment Perspective: A Response to Dunn & Mulvenon (2009).” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 17 (16): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. N. 2012. Assessment and Learning. Edited by J. N. Gardner. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2006. “On the Nature of ‘Context’ in Chemical Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 957–976. doi:10.1080/09500690600702470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., A. M. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-Based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.493185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 1998. “The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research.” American Psychologist 53 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2013. “Mental Models and Cognitive Change.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25 (2): 131–138. doi:10.1080/20445911.2012.759935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. 1991. “Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things Are Seldom What They Seem.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7 (2): 75–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice-Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., and B. Nash. 2011. “Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 30 (4): 28–37. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 2009. “What is the Nature of Knowledge Development in Lesson Study?” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1080/09650790802667477.
   Google Scholar
• Lipowsky, F., K. Rakoczy, C. Pauli, B. Drollinger-Vetter, E. Klieme, and K. Reusser. 2009. “Quality of Geometry Instruction and Its Short-Term Impact on Students’ Understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem.” Learning and Instruction 19 (6): 527–537.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., J. C. Venable, and D. Varier. 2013. “Studies of the Effects of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: So Much More is Needed.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 18 (2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mettetal, G. 2001. “The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research.” Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2 (1): 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L. 2009. “Unpacking Variety in Practitioner Inquiry on Teaching and Teacher Education.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 111–119. doi:10.1080/09650790802667485.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, M., J. D. Vermunt, P. C. Meijer, A. M. W. Bulte, and M. Brekelmans. 2014. “Students’ Perceptions of Teaching in Context-Based and Traditional Chemistry Classrooms: Comparing Content, Learning Activities, and Interpersonal Perspectives.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (11): 1871–1901. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.880004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I., C. Gräsel, A. Baer, P. Nentwig, R. Demuth, and B. Ralle. 2006. “’Chemie Im Kontext: A Symbiotic Implementation of a Context-Based Teaching and Learning Approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1041–1062. doi:10.1080/09500690600702512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, Á. I., E. Soto, and M. J. Serván. 2010. “Participatory Action Research and the Reconstruction of Teachers’ Practical Thinking: Lesson Studies and Core Reflection. an Experience in Spain.” Educational Action Research 18 (1): 73–87. doi:10.1080/09650790903484533.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, N. 2008. “A Scientific Approach to the Teaching of Chemistry. What Do We Know about How Students Learn in the Sciences, and How Can We Make Our Teaching Match This to Maximise Performance?” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1039/B801297 K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. London: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schoot-Uiterkamp, R., M. Velzeboer-Breeman, J. Vogelzang, and A. Mast. 2008. Melkzuur (Lactic Acid). 19 February 2016. http://www.scheikundeinbedrijf.nl/Module/index.rails?id=3.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., T. D. Cook, and D. T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Hougton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., D. B. Young, C. C. Ayala, P. R. Brandon, E. M. Furtak, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, and Y. Yin. 2008. “On the Impact of Curriculum-Embedded Formative Assessment on Learning: A Collaboration between Curriculum and Assessment Developers.” Applied Measurement in Education 21 (4): 295–314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, H. F., J. R. Hanson, R. W. Strong, and P. B. Schwartz. 1996. Teaching Styles and Strategies. 3rd ed. Trenton, NJ: The Thoughtful Education Press..
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., and K. Ely. 2011. “A Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning in Work-Related Training and Educational Attainment: What We Know and Where We Need to Go.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (3): 421–442. doi:10.1037/a0022777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, H. L., C. C. Chin, and S. H. Shieh. 2005. “The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation towards Science Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (6): 639–654. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, M. A. J., R. Taconis, W. M. G. Jochems, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Classroom Implementation of Context-Based Chemistry Education by Teachers: The Relation between Experiences of Teachers and the Design of Materials.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1407–1432. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.511659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieringa, N., F. J. J. M. Janssen, and J. H. Van Driel. 2011. “Biology Teachers Designing Context-Based Lessons for Their Classroom Practice – The Importance of Rules-of-Thumb.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (17): 2437–2462. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.553969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., R. J. Shavelson, C. C. Ayala, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, P. R. Brandon, E. M. Furtak, and D. B. Young. 2008. “On the Impact of Formative Assessment on Student Motivation, Achievement, and Conceptual Change.” Applied Measurement in Education 21 (4): 335–359. doi:10.1080/08957340802347845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M. 2003. “Teacher Research as Professional Development for P–12 Educators in the USA[1].” Educational Action Research 11 (2): 301–326. doi:10.1080/09650790300200211.
   Google Scholar
• Zeni, J. 1998. “Guide to Ethical Issues and Action Research.” Educational Action Research 6 (1): 9–19.10.1080/09650799800200053
   Google Scholar