Lecturers’ text competencies and guidance towards academic literacy

References

• Aamodt, Per O., Elisabeth Hovdhaugen, and Vigdis Opheim. 2006. Den Nye Studiehverdagen. Evaluering Av Kvalitetsreformen. Delrapport 6 [Evaluation of the Norwegian Quality Reform. Part 6 report]. Accessed 15 January 2015. http://www.nifu.no/files/2013/03/Delrapport6-Kvalitetsreformen6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Richard. 2009. “A Case Study of Argumentation at Undergraduate Level in History.” Argumentation 23: 547–558. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9165-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askeland, Norunn, and Bente Aamotsbakken. 2013. “At sannheten var hans beste venn: om fagskriving og fordypningsoppgave i norskfaget på videregående skole”. [The Truth Was His Best Friend: Concerning Disciplinary Writing and the Major Thesis in Norwegian Literature and Language in Upper Secondary School]. In Pedagogiske tekster og ressurser i praksis, edited by Susanne V. Knudsen, 15–35. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Michelle, and Sue Rechter. 2013. “A Critical Reflection on the Use of an Embedded Academic Literacy Program for Teaching Sociology.” Journal of Sociology 49 (4): 456–470. doi:10.1177/1440783313504056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannick, Teresa, and David Coghlan. 2014. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ciabattari, Teresa. 2013. “Creating a Culture of Good Writing: A Cumulative Model for Teaching Writing in the Sociology Major.” Teaching Sociology 41 (1): 60–69. doi:10.1177/0092055X12462415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin, Caroline. 2009. “Contemporary Educational Argumentation: A Multimodal Perspective.” Argumentation 23: 513–530. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9161-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, Olga. 2001. “The Mutual Challenge of Writing Research and the Teaching of Writing.” Draft Keynote Address, the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing (EATAW), University of Groeningen, Netherlands. Journal of English for Academic Access Date 6. Des. 2014. http://www.uib.no/filearchive/keynote_eataw18-1-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, Olga, Ivar Lima, and Arild Raaheim. 2006. ”Pedagogiske endringer som følge av kvalitetsreformen.” [Pedagogical Changes as a Consequence of The Quality Reform]. In Kvalitetsreformen møter virkeligheten. Evaluering av kvalitetsreformen. Delrapport 1 [The Quality Reform Meets Reality. Part 1 Report], edited by Svein Michelsen and Per O. Aamodt, 50–75. Oslo: Norges forskningsråd/NIFU STEP/Rokkansenteret.
   Google Scholar
• Gourvenne, Aslaug, F., Ingrid Nielsen, and Atle Skaftun. 2014. “Inn i norskfaget? Litterære samtaler som faglig praksis.” [Embedding Literaur Dialouges in Norwegian Subject Teaching?] In Skriv! Les! Artikler fra den andre nordiske konferansen om skriving, lesing og literacy, edited by Atle Skaftun, Per H. Uppstad, and Arne J. Aasen, 27–45. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Greek, Marit, and Kari Mari Jonsmoen. 2012a. “Skrivekår i profesjonsutdanning.” [Conditions for Writing in Vocational Studies]. Uniped 36 (1): 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Greek, Marit, and Kari Mari Jonsmoen. 2012b. “’Hodet blir tungt – og tomt’ – om det å skrive seg til profesjonsutøvelse.” [“My Head Just Empties” – About Writing in Higher Education]. In Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 96 (1). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Greek, Marit, and Kari Mari Jonsmoen. 2013. “Skriveveiledning til økt fag- og tekstforståelse.” [Guidance to Academic Literacy]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift 97 (4–5): 281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, John. 2000. “Critical Thinking and the Academic Vocational Divide.” Curriculum Journal 11 (2): 159–175. doi:10.1080/09585170050045182.
   Google Scholar
• Helstad, Kristin, and Frøydis Herzberg. 2013. “Faste mønstre som skrivestøtte i skriveundervisningen.” [Textual Models as Support in Teaching Writing]. In Literacy I Læringskontekster, edited by Dagrunn Skjelbred and Aslaug Veum, 225–248. Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
   Google Scholar
• Helstad, Kristin, and Andreas Lund. 2012. “Teachers’ Talk on Students’ Writing: Negotiating Texts in Interdisciplinary Teacher Teams.” Teaching & Teacher Education 28 (4): 599–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgens, David. 2011. “Why Reflect? Recognising the Link between Learning and Reflection.” Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives 12 (5): 583–584. doi:10.1080/14623943.2011.606693.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Kerry. 2006. “Embedding Academic Literacy Development into the Curriculum: A University of Technology, Sydney Case Study.” In Supporting Learning in the 21st Century: Refereed Proceedings of the 2005 ATLAANZ Conference, edited by Gabrielle Grigg and Caroline Bond, 115–128. Auckland: ATLAANZ. ISBN 10:0-473-11610-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, Kerry, and Harry Tse. 2013. “Making Disciplinary Writing and Thinking Practices an Integral Part of Academic Content Teaching.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (3): 227–239. doi:10.1177/1469787413498037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, Ken. 2002. “Specificity Revisited: How Far Should We Go Now?” English for Specific Purposes 21 (4): 385–395. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, Christoffer. 2013. Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Clark, Shannon. 2012. Embedding Academic Literacy in First Year Units of Study. North Sydney: Learning and Teaching Centre, Australian Catholic University.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, May R. 1998. “Academic Literacies and Learning in Higher Education; Constructing Knowledge Through Texts and Experience.” Studies in the Education of Adults 30 (2): 156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, Mary R. 2004. “Academic Literacies: A Pedagogy for Course Design.” Studies in Higher Education 29 (6): 739–756. doi:10.1080/0307507042000287230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, Mary R., and Brian V. Street. 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–172.10.1080/03075079812331380364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, Mary R., and Brian V. Street. 2004. “The ‘Academic Literacies’ Model: Theory and Applications.” Theory into Practice 45 (4): 368–377. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LK. 2006. National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training 2006. Accessed 15 December 2014. http://www.utdanningsdirektoratet.no/
   Google Scholar
• Lødding, Berit, and Per O. Aamodt. 2015. “Studieforberedt etter studieforberedende?” Norsk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning. Rapport 2015:8. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Lycke, Kirsten H., and Gunnar Handal. 2012. “Refleksjon over egen undervisningspraksis - et ledd i kvalitetsutvikling?” In Utdanningskvalitet og undervisningskvalitet under Press?, edited by Torlaug L. Hoel, Brit Hansen and Dag Husebø, 157–185. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meirink, Jacobienea A., C. Meijer Paulien, and Nico Verloop. 2007. “A Closer Look at Teachers’ Individual Learning in Collaborative Settings.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 13 (2): 145–164. doi:10.1080/13540600601152496.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Sally, and A. Alan Evison. 2006. “Exploiting the Potential of Writing for Educational Change at Queen Mary, University of London.” In Teaching Academic Writing in Higher Education, edited by Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams, 68–84. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Øgreid, Anne K., and Frøydis Hertzberg. 2009. “Argumentation in and across Disciplines: Two Norwegian Classes.” Argumentation 23: 451–468. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9162-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østren, Siri G. 2008. “Unnskyld lærer, vi har historie nå…” En kasus studie av et tverrfaglig samarbeidsprosjekt i skriving i videregående skole, med fokus på elevtekster [“Excuse me Teacher, We have History now…” A Case Study of a Collaborative Project in Writing Across Disciplines at Upper Secondary School]. Masteroppgave i nordisk didaktikk. Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling. Lektor og adjunktprogrammet. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Penne, Sylvi. 2012. “Når deler erstatter helheten: litterære utdrag og norskfaget lærebøker.” [Literature at School from a Literacy Perspective]. In Teorier om tekst i møte med skolens lese- og skrivepraksiser, edited by Synnøve Matre, Dagrunn K. Sjøheller and Randi Solheim, 163–174. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Penne, Sylvi. 2013. “Skjønnlitteraturen i skolen i et literacyperspektiv.” [Literature at School from a Literacy Perspective]. In Literacy i læringskontekster [Literacy in Learning Contexts], edited by Dagrunn Skjelbred and Aslaug Veum, 42–54. Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781848607934
   Google Scholar
• Rienecker, Lotte, and Peter Stray Jørgensen. 2007. Den gode oppgaven – håndbok i oppgaveskriving på universitet og høyskole. [The Excellent Assignment – A Guide in Writing for Higher Education]. (2. utg.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rødnes, Kari A. 2011. Elevers meningsskaping av norskfaglige tekster i videregående skole [Students' meaning making from Norwegian Subject Texts in Upper Secondary School]. Det Utdanningsvitenskapelige Fakultet. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, Timothy, and Cynthia Shanahan. 2008. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy.” Harvard Educational Review 78 (1): 40–59. Accessed 15 September 2014. http://search.proquest.com/docview/212267873/abstract?accountid=2643910.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Shirley, and Katherine Richardson. 2009. “Argumentation in School Science: Breaking the Tradition of Autorative Exposition through a Pedagogy That Promotes Discussion and Reasoning.” Argumentation 23 (4): 469–493. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9164-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Meld. nr. 27 (2000–2001). 2001. The Norwegian Quality Reform. Gjør din plikt – Krev din rett [Action Learning: Research Partnership in School]. Accessed 30 October 2013. http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/kd/dok/regpubl/stmeld/20002001/stmeld-nr-27-2000-2001-.html?id=194247
   Google Scholar
• Tiller, Tom. 1999. Aksjonslæring: Forskende partnerskap i skolen [Action Learning: Research Partnership in School]. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (n.d.). Kompetansemål etter Vg3 – studieforberedende utdanningsprogram [Competence Aims after Level Vg3 General Study Programmes]. Accessed 17 Mars 2015. http://www.udir.no/kl06/NOR1-05/Kompetansemaal/?arst=1858830314&kmsn=-1569321230
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, Ursula. 2012a. “Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’ Journey.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 (1): 26–37. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, Ursula. 2012b. “Argument! Helping Students Understand What Essay Writing is about.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 (2): 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, Ursula, Nick Andon, and Alessia Cogo. 2011. “Embedding Academic Writing Instruction into Subject Teaching: A Case Study.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12: 69–81. doi:10.1177/1469787410387814.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, Ursula, and Christopher Tribble. 2012. “The Best of Both Worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies Writing Pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 481–495. Accessed 20 September 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.52563010.1080/03075079.2010.525630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar