‘A guided walk in the woods’: boundary crossing in a collaborative action research project

References

• Ahlström, P. , F. Nilsson , and N. G. Olve . 2007. “Mobilising and Nurturing Collaboration in Research – The Value of Focused Imagination.” International Journal of Action Research 3 (3): 297–323.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. , W. Admiraal , and R. J. Simons . 2012. “Unity and Diversity in a Collaborative Research Project.” Culture & Psychology 18 (2): 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F. , and A. Bakker . 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorn, P. , and N. Boulus . 2011. “Dissenting in Reflective Conversations: Critical Components of Doing Action Research.” Action Research 9 (3): 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310396949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W. S. 2008. “Voices from the Field: Practitioner Reactions to Collaborative Research Initiatives.” Action Research 6 (4): 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750308097025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. , and M. L. McLaughlin . 1995. “Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan 76 (8): 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A. , M. Craps , R. Bouwen , F. April , and M. Zhingri . 2005. “How Indigenous Farmers and University Engineers Create Actionable Knowledge for Sustainable Irrigation.” Action Research 3 (2): 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305052141
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S. C. , and J. L. Buckle . 2009. “The Space between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1): 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding. an Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research . Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. 2003. “Action Research and Orders of Democracy.” Action Research 1 (1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011004
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. , and M. Levin . 2007. Introduction to Action Research . 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, E. , and M. Bond . 1996. “Making Sense of Action Research through the Use of a Typology.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 23 (1): 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb03147.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, K. , and G. Anderson . 2014. The Action Research Dissertation . 2nd revised ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huzzard, T. , B. M. Ahlberg , and M. Ekman . 2010. “Constructing Interorganizational Collaboration. the Action Researcher as Boundary Subject.” Action Research 8 (3): 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750309335206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. 2010. “Conflicting Demands and the Power of Defensive Routines in Participatory Action Research.” International Journal of Action Research 8 (4): 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310366041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2001. “Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jürgen Habermas.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice , edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury , 91–102. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences . London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koutselini, M. 2008. “Participatory Teacher Development at Schools: Processes and Issues.” Action Research 6 (1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307083718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, D. , and M. Morton . 2009. “Reflecting on Community/Academic “Collaboration”: the Challenge of “Doing” Feminist Participatory Action Research.” Action Research 7 (2): 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750309103261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3 (4): 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. , and A. W. Martin . 2007. “The Praxis of Educating Action Researchers. the Possibilities and Obstacles in Higher Education.” Action Research 5 (3): 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307081014
   Google Scholar
• Maykut, P. S. , and S. E. Morehouse . 1994. Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide . London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. , J. Mengis , and J. Swan . 2012. “Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration.” Organization Science 23: 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. , J. Dodge , B. Godsoe , J. Minieri , S. Reza , and E. Schall . 2004. “From Consent to Mutual Inquiry: Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research.” Action Research 2 (1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750304040494
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R. N. 1970. “Three Dilemmas in Action Research.” Human Relations 23 (6): 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677002300601
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. , and H. Bradbury , eds. 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice . 1st ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. , L. Bratini , D. -A. Chambers , R. V. Jensen , and L. L. Romero . 2010. “Between Idealism and Reality: Meeting the Challenges of Participatory Action Research.” Action Research 8 (4): 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310366043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. , and J. R. Griesemer . 1989. “Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19: 287–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L. , R. Bolam , A. McMahon , M. Wallace , and S. Thomas . 2006. “Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Educational Change 7: 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Tulinius, C. , and B. Holge-Hazelton . 2011. “When the Spiral of Action Research Collapses: Using the Arts to Interpret and Continue the Process in Collective Research Dialogue.” Action Research 9 (1): 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750311398307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Westhues, A. , J. Ochocka , N. Jacobson , L. Simich , S. Maiter , R. Janzen , and A. Fleras . 2008. “Developing Theory from Complexity: Reflections on a Collaborative Mixed Method Participatory Action Research Study.” Journal of Qualitative Health Research 18 (5): 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308316531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V. , P. St Quintin , and S. Hoadley . 2006. “Take Your Partners: Reflections on a Partnership Project in Learning Disability Research.” Action Research 4 (3): 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306066803
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H. , and Y. C. Yu . 2006. “Exploring Inter-Professional Collaboration within Action Research Group in Health Care Sectors.” Asian Journal of Health and Information Sciences 1 (2): 152–162.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research. Design and Methods . Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar