Comparing face-to-face and asynchronous online communication as mechanisms for critical reflective dialogue

References

• Boud, D., R. Keogh, and D. Walker. 2013. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R. 2009. “The Graduate Attributes We’ve Overlooked: Enhancing Graduate Employability through Career Management Skills.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (1): 31–44.10.1080/07294360802444347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. 2000. “Transformative Learning as Ideology Critique.” In Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress, edited by J. Mezirow, 125–148. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 1998. “The Importance of Mess in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 6 (1): 93–109.10.1080/09650799800200047
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., P. Cartney, K. Wilkinson, J. Parkinson, S. Cunningham, C. James-Reynolds, T. Zoubir, et al. 2016. Literature Review on the Use of Action Research in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., and S. Holland, eds. 2007. Graduate Attributes, Learning and Employability (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/1-4020-5342-8
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, I. R., C. R. Graham, K. J. Spring, J. S. Drysdale, and C. R. Henrie. 2014. “A Thematic Analysis of the Most Highly Cited Scholarship in the First Decade of Blended Learning Research.” Internet and Higher Education. 20: 20–34.10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., and W. S. Cheung. 2012. Student Participation in Online Discussions: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Research. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2370-6
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., W. S. Cheung, and C. S. I. Ng. 2010. “Student Contribution in Asynchronous Online Discussion: A Review of the Research and Empirical Exploration.” Instructional Science 38 (6): 571–606.10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, D., T. S. Chee, J. G. Hedberg, and K. Thiam Seng. 2005. “A Framework for Fostering a Community of Practice:Scaffolding Learners through an Evolving Continuum.” British Journal of Educational Technology 36 (2): 159–176.10.1111/bjet.2005.36.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. P. 2012. A Short Guide to Action Research. 4th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D. 2000. Action Learning and Action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. 3rd ed. Geelong: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, E., and B. Cowie. 2011. “Cycles of Negotiation and Reflection: A Negotiated Intervention to Promote Online Teacher Development.” Educational Action Research 19 (3): 345–361.10.1080/09650792.2011.600622
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A., R. E. Boyatzis, and C. Mainemelis. 2001. “Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions.” Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles 1: 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S. C. 2014. “Developing Information Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills through Domain Knowledge Learning in Digital Classrooms: An Experience of Practicing Flipped Classroom Strategy.” Computers and Education 78: 160–173.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. 2008. “The Teacher as Action Researcher: Using Technology to Capture Pedagogic Form.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (2): 139–154.10.1080/03075070801915908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N. J. 2009. Using Group Reflection in an Action Research Study: When Group Reflection Was Used in an Action Research Study, It Was Received Positively and Proved to Be a Valuable Component of a Study of a Nurse-Led Unit in a Community Hospital, Explains Nancy-Jane Lee. Nurse Researcher 16 (2): 30–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine, T. H., and A. S. Marcus. 2010. “How the Structure and Focus of Teachers’ Collaborative Activities Facilitate and Constrain Teacher Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 389–398.10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2: 34–46.10.1111/josi.1946.2.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1952. “Group Decision and Social Change.” In Readings in Social Psychology, edited by G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, and F. E. Hartley, 197–211. New York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., R. J. Magjuka, C. J. Bonk, and S. Lee. 2007. “Does Sense of Community Matter?” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 8 (1): 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhorst, D., W. Admiraal, and A. Pilot. 2010. “CSCL in Teacher Training: What Tasks Lead to Teacher Collaboration?” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (1): 63–78.10.1080/14759390903579190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncar, M., N. E. Barrett, and G. Liu. 2014. “Towards the Refinement of Forum and Asynchronous Online Discussion in Educational Contexts Worldwide: Trends and Investigative Approaches within a Dominant Research Paradigm.” Computers and Education 73: 93–110.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, D. 2003. “The Teacher’s Role in Developing Interaction and Reflection in an Online Learning Community.” Educational Media International 40 (1-2): 127–138.10.1080/0952398032000092170
   Google Scholar
• Markel, S.L. (2001). Technology and Education Online Discussion Forums: It’s in the Response. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2) Summer 2001. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer42/markel42.html.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. 1998. “What Are the General Skills of Thinking and Reasoning and How Do You Teach Them?” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 71 (5): 268–273.10.1080/00098659809602721
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. B. 2011. “Student Engagement with, and Participation in, E-Forum.” Journal of Educational Technology and Society 14 (2): 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, J. 2015. “The Quest for Authenticity: A Study of an Online Discussion Forum and the Needs of Adult Learners.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 55 (1): 94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKernan, J. 2013. Curriculum Action Research: A Handbook of Methods and Resources for the Reflective Practitioner. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orvis, K. L., R. A. Wisher, C. J. Bonk, and T. M. Olson. 2002. “Communication Patterns during Synchronous Web-Based Military Training in Problem Solving.” Computers in Human Behaviour 18: 783–795.10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00018-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, T. 2016. “Making Reflective Practice Visible: Supporting Shifts in Practice towards Personalized Learning.” Master of Education thesis, University of Victoria, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. 2002. “Mirror, Mirror, on My Screen. Exploring Online Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (4): 379–391.10.1111/bjet.2002.33.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, E. T. 2008. Action Research in Education. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, J. 2003. “Transformative Teacher Networks, on-Line Professional Development, and the Write for Your Life Project.” English Education 35 (4): 262–321.
   Google Scholar
• Thang, S. M., C. Hall, P. Murugaiah, and H. Azman. 2011. “Creating and Maintaining Online Communities of Practice in Malaysian Smart Schools: Challenging Realities.” Educational Action Research 19 (1): 87–105.10.1080/09650792.2011.547724
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, M. 2012. “Graduate Employability: A Review of Conceptual and Empirical Themes.” Higher Education Policy 25 (4): 407–431.10.1057/hep.2011.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters-Adams, S. 2006. Action Research in Education. Plymouth: University of Plymouth. http://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/RESINED/actionresearch/arhome.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, T. R. 2006. “Using the Socratic Method and Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain to Enhance Online Discussion, Critical Thinking, and Student Learning.” Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning 33: 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., and H. Tsoukas. 2009. “What is Reflection-in-Action? A Phenomenological Account.” Journal of Management Studies 46: 1339–1364. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00859.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar