Inter-professional collaboration in action research

References

• Adviesraad voor wetenschaps- en technologiebeleid [Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy]. 2003. Onderzoek in Het Onderwijs: Versterking Van De Brug Tussen Onderzoek En Onderwijspraktijk [Research in Education: Strengthen the Bridge between Research and Educational Practice]. Den Haag: Advies.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., and A. Armstrong. 2014. “Using Co-Inquiry to Study Co-Inquiry: Community-University Perspectives on Research Collaboration.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 7 (1): 37–47 (PAR).
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S. 2014. “Collaboration between Academics and Teachers: A Complex Relationship.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 270–284.10.1080/09650792.2013.869181
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, H. 2010. “Poetic Expression and Poetic Form in Practitioner Research.” Educational Action Research 18 (3): 389–400.10.1080/09650792.2010.500096
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. 2003. “Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938. Education and Experience. New York: Collier Books.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2011. “Building Common Knowledge at the Boundaries between Professional Practices: Relational Agency and Relational Expertise in Systems of Distributed Expertise.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (1): 33–39.10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M.G. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jochems, W. 2012. “Onderwijsonderzoek En Onderwijspraktijk, Once the Twain Shall Meet!” [Educational Research and Educational Practice, Once the Twain Shall Meet!] Pedagogische Studiën 89 (6): 411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. 2013. “Praktijk in De Plaats Van Blauwdruk. over Het Opleiden Van Lerarenopleiders.” [Practice instead of Blueprint. about Educating Teacher Educators.] Tijdschrift Voor Lerarenopleiders 34 (3): 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2000. “Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research.” In The International Handbook of Action Research, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 91–102. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice‐Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474.10.1080/09650790903093284
   Google Scholar
• Koeven, E. van. 2015. Je Vak Moet Je Doen, Niet Lezen. Vrij Lezen in Het Entree-Onderwijs [Your Profession You Have to Do, Do Not Read. Free Reading in Vocational Education]. Den Haag: Stichting Lezen, Deltion College, Windesheim University.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 2004. The Power of Reading: Insights from the Research. 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 2011. Free Voluntary Reading. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Leeman, Y., and W. Wardekker. 2014. “Teacher Research and the Aims of Education.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 20 (1): 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. 2010. “Tools for the Study and Design of Collaborative Teacher Learning. the Affordances of Different Conceptions of Teacher Community and Activity Theory.” Teacher Education Quarterley 37 (1): 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., R. Perry, and A. Murata. 2006. “How Should Research Contribute to Instructional Improvement? The Case of Lesson Study.” Educational Researcher 35 (3): 3–14.10.3102/0013189X035003003
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2013. “Ethical Issues in Collaborative Action Research.” Educational Action Research 21 (1): 107–123.10.1080/09650792.2013.763448
   Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., J. Flanagan, and B. Wigley. 2016. “A New Model of Collaborative Action Research: Theorizing from Inter-Professional Practice-Development.” Educational Action Research 24 (4): 519–534.10.1080/09650792.2015.1110038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S.E. 2010. To Read or Not to Read. Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, I.A., R.A. London, and K.R. Strobel. 2015. “Reinventing the Role of the University Researcher.” Educational Researcher 44 (1): 17–26.10.3102/0013189X15570387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffke, S., and B. Somekh, eds. 2009. Handbook of Educational Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgreen, J.L. 2000. The SSR Handbook. How to Organize and Manage a Sustained Silent Reading Program. Portsmouth: Boyton/Cook Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., and C.L. Poortman. 2015. “Factors Influencing the Functioning of Data Teams.” Teacher College Record 117 (4): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1995. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodeling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21.10.1080/09650790802667402
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J., K. Gravemeijer, S. MCKenney, and N. Nieveen. 2006. Educational Design Research. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., R. Zwart, J. Meirink, and N. Verloop. 2010. Professionele Ontwikkeling Van Leraren. Een Reviewstudie Naar Effectieve Kenmerken Van Professionaliseringsinterventies Van Leraren [Teachers’ Professional Development. a Review Study into Effective Characteristics of Interventions]. Leiden: ICLON.
   Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., H. Westbroek, A. Handelzalts, A. Walraven, S. McKenney, J. Pieters, and B. de Vries. 2011. “Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (8): 1235–1244.10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar