Evaluation of a pedagogical model for student engagement in learning activities

References

• Assor, A., H. Kaplan, and G. Roth. 2002. “Choice is Good, but Relevance is Excellent: Autonomy-Enhancing and Suppressing Teacher Behaviours Predicting Students’ Engagement in Schoolwork.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 72 (2): 261–278.10.1348/000709902158883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., and M. R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529.10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (BIE) Buck Institute for Education. 2016. What is Project Based Learning (PBL)? https://bie.org/about/what_pbl
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, M., and C. Boynton. 2005. The Educator’s Guide to Preventing and Solving Discipline Problems. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. 2008. “Developing Students' Appreciation for What is Taught in School.” Educational Psychologist 43 (3): 132–141.10.1080/00461520701756511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A. 2009. “Action Research.” In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction, edited by J. Heigham and R. A. Croker, 112–134. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Day, K., T. Kenealy, and N. Sheridan. 2016. “Should We Embed Randomized Controlled Trials within Action Research: Arguing from a Case Study of Telemonitoring.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 16 (1): 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2000. “The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., and R. W. Roeser. 2011. “Schools as Developmental Contexts during Adolescence.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 21 (1): 225–241.10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2015. “Educational Action Research as the Quest for Virtue in Teaching.” Educational Action Research 23 (1): 4–21.10.1080/09650792.2014.994017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D. 1993. School Engagement & Students at Risk. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109.10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., and W. McColskey. 2012. “The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-Report Instruments.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. Christenson, A. Reschly and C. Wylie, 763–782. London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. Blumenfeld, J. Friedel, and A. Paris. 2005. “School Engagement.” In What Do Children Need to Flourish?, edited by Kristin Anderson Moore and Laura H. Lippman, 305–321. London: Springer.10.1007/b100487
   Google Scholar
• Gallup. 2014. Fall 2014 U.S. Overall GALLUP Student Poll Results. Washington, DC: Gallup Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A. 2015. “Measuring Cognitive Engagement with Self-Report Scales: Reflections from over 20 Years of Research.” Educational Psychologist 50 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., and K. A. Renninger. 2006. “The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 111–127.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtte, M. V. 2004. “Why Boys Achieve Less at School than Girls: The Difference between Boys' and Girls' Academic Culture.” Educational Studies 30 (2): 159–173.10.1080/0305569032000159804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. 2013. “Framing Student Engagement in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (5): 758–773.10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M. 2000. “Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years.” American Educational Research Journal 37 (1): 153–184.10.3102/00028312037001153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. 1994. “Participatory Action Research: Issues in Theory and Practice.” Educational Action Research 2 (3): 313–337.10.1080/0965079940020302
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F., G. Wehlage, and D. Lamborn. 1992. “The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement.” In Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, edited by F. Newmann, 11–39. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• (OECD) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., J. C. Turner, and D. K. Meyer. 2006. “Classrooms as Contexts for Motivating Learning.” In Handbook of Educational Psychology. Vol. 2, edited by P. Alexander and P. Winne, 327–348. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., and S. Hase. 2005. “Complexity and Action Research: Exploring the Theoretical and Methodological Connections.” Educational Action Research 10 (3): 507–524.10.1080/09650790200200198
   Google Scholar
• Pino-James, N. 2015. “Student Engagement in Modern Foreign Languages: A Pedagogical Model.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Coventry: University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. 2012. “A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. Christenson, A. Reschly and C. Wylie, 149–172. London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Sagor, R. 2011. The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Stage Process for Educators and School Teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Scales, P. C. 1991. A Portrait of Young Adolescents in the 1990s: Implications for Promoting Healthy Growth and Development. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute/Center for Early Adolescence.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J. 2013. Optimal Learning Environments to Promote Student Engagement. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7089-2
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (4): 571–581.10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and J. R. Pitzer. 2012. “Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience.” In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by S. Christenson, A. Reschly and C. Wylie, 21–44. London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S., and J. Robinson. 1994. “Action Research: An Appropriate Design for Research in Nursing?” Educational Action Research 2 (3): 347–356.10.1080/0965079940020304
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., A. Christensen, H. Kackar-Cam, M. Trucano, and S. Fulmer. 2014. “Enhancing Students' Engagement: Report of a 3-Year Intervention with Middle School Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (6): 1195–1226.10.3102/0002831214532515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadyaya, K., and K. Salmela-Aro. 2013. “Development of School Engagement in Association with Academic Success and Well-Being in Varying Social Contexts.” European Psychologist 18 (2): 136–147.10.1027/1016-9040/a000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K., A. Wigfield, and D. Miele. 2009. Handbook of Motivation at School. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 68–81.10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar