Defining and navigating ‘action’ in a Participatory Action Research project

References

• Barlow, A.E., and M. Villarejo. 2004. “Making a Difference for Minorities: Evaluation of an Educational Enrichment Program.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41: 861–881. doi:10.1002/tea.20029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S.R. 2015. “McNair Scholars Program Prepares Students for the PhD Program in Materials Research.” MRS Bulletin 40 (6): 470–472. doi:10.1557/mrs.2015.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladt, M., and K.A. Nielsen. 2013. “Free Space in the Processes of Action Research.” Action Research 11 (4): 369–385. doi:10.1177/1476750313502556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M. 2008. “Ethics and Action Research: Deepening Our Commitment to Principles of Social Justice and Redefining Systems of Democratic Practice.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 199–210. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., P. Gayá, P. Noone, A. Willatt, C. Book, S. Cohen, A. Nichols, L. Tetreault, and B.T. Williams. 2016. Pass the Parcel: The Ever Expanding Impact of Critical Utopian Action Research. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon‐Miller, M., and P. Maguire. 2008. “Participatory Action Research: Contributions to the Development of Practitioner Inquiry in Education.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 79–93. doi:10.1080/09650790802667469.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., A. Rector Aranda, and D.M. Stevens. 2015. “Widening the Circle: Ethical Reflection in Action Research and the Practice of Structured Ethical Reflection.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury, 596-607. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, D. 2007. Systemic Action Research: A Strategy for Whole System Change. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L., and T. Poldma. 2011. “The Power of Visual Approaches in Qualitative Inquiry: The Use of Collage Making and Concept Mapping in Experiential Research.” Journal of Research Practice 6 (2): 18.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, E.Z., A.M. White, and M.E. Gray. 2016. “Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?” BioScience, biv173. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv173.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., and G. Skoog. 2004. “Preparing Undergraduate Women for Science Careers.” Journal of College Science Teaching 33 (5): 24.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J.M., and D. Buckles. 2013. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clover, D. 2011. “Successes and Challenges of Feminist Arts-based Participatory Methodologies with Homeless/street-involved Women in Victoria.” Action Research 9 (1): 12–26. doi:10.1177/1476750310396950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and T. Brannick. 2010. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D., and A. Espinoza. 2011. “The Postbaccalaureate Goals of College Women in STEM.” New Directions for Institutional Research (2011 (152): 51–58. doi:10.1002/ir.408.
   Google Scholar
• Digest of Education Statistics. 2014. Number and Percentage Distribution of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Degrees/certificates Conferred by Postsecondary Institutions, by Race/ethnicity, Level of Degree/certificate, and Sex of Student: 2008–09 through 2012–13.
   Google Scholar
• Duguid, M. 2011. “Female Tokens in High-prestige Work Groups: Catalysts or Inhibitors of Group Diversification?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116 (1): 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, L.L. 2011. “Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College Experiences that Contribute to Persistence.” Harvard Educational Review 81 (2): 209–241. doi:10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenblatt, P. 2013. “Collage Portraits as a Method of Analysis in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12 (1): 294–309. doi:10.1177/160940691301200114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D.J., and M. Levin. 2006. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Griebling, S., L.M. Vaughn, B. Howell, C. Ramstetter, and D. Dole. 2013. “From Passive to Active Voice: Using Photography as a Catalyst for Social Action.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 3 (2): 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G.L. Anderson (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., C. Corbett, and A. St Rose. 2010. “Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.” American Association of University Women. 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, A. 2015. “Balancing Family Life with a Science Career.” Nature Immunology 16 (8): 787–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S.F. 2008. “A Participatory Group Process to Analyze Qualitative Data.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 2 (2): 161–170. doi:10.1353/cpr.0.0010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kardash, C.M. 2000. “Evaluation of Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 191. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maton, K.I., F.A. Hrabowski, and C.L. Schmitt. 2000. “African American College Students Excelling in the Sciences: College and Postcollege Outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (7): 629–654. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. 2003. “Through the Eyes of Women: Photovoice and Participatory Research as Tools for Reimagining Place.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 10 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1080/0966369032000052658.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. 2008. Participatory Action Research. Vol. 52. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, J., U. Anucha, H. Appiah, and S. Levesque. 2014. “From Research to Action: Four Theories and Their Implications for Knowledge Mobilization.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5: 3. doi:10.22230/src.2014v5n3a161.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K.A., and B.S. Nielsen. 2006. “Methodologies in Action Research.” In Action and Interaction Research-beyond Practice and Theory Shaker Publishing: Maastricht, Netherlands,edited byNielsen and Svensson, 1-21. Shaker Publishing B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, C., A. Tom, and W. Frisby. 2006. “Finding the ‘Action’ in Feminist Participatory Action Research.” Action Research 4 (3): 315–332. doi:10.1177/1476750306066804.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., L. Bratini, D.A. Chambers, R.V. Jensen, and L. Romero. 2010. “Between Idealism and Reality: Meeting the Challenges of Participatory Action Research.” Action Research 8 (4): 407–425. doi:10.1177/1476750310366043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L.M., and M. Lohmueller. 2014. “Calling All Stakeholders Group-Level Assessment (GLA)—A Qualitative and Participatory Method for Large Groups.” Evaluation review 38 (4): 336-355.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., and M. Burris. 1997. “Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment.” Health Education and Behavior 24 (3): 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F. 2016. “Collage.” Journal of Leisure Research 48 (4): 338. doi:10.18666/JLR-2016-V48-I4-6922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, W. 2014. “Research Experience for Undergraduate Students and Its Impact on STEM Education.” Journal of STEM Education 15: 1.
   Google Scholar