Action research in education: a set of case studies?

References

• Abou Baker, E.-D.M. 2007. “Levels of Reflection in Action Research. An Overview and an Assessment Tool.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (1): 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, M. 2008. “The Responsive Case Study: Action Research and Action Learning in Short Courses.” Educational Action Research 16 (1): 97–108. doi:10.1080/09650790701833147.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, A., B. Martínez-Peña, and M.R. Jiménez-Liso. 2018. “¿Puede la investigación iluminar el cambio educativo?” Ápice. Revista De Educación Científica 2 (2): 15–28. doi:10.17979/arec.2018.2.2.4612.
   Google Scholar
• Bonafé, J. 1988. “El estudio de casos en la investigación educativa.” Investigación En La Escuela 6: 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W. 2006. “Philosophy, Methodology and Action Research.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4): 421–435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00517.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., F. Huang, and W. Zeng. 2018. “Comments on Systematic Methodologies of Action Research in the New Millennium: A Review of Publications 2000–2014.” Action Research 16 (4): 341–360. doi:10.1177/1476750317691103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corey, S. 1953. Action Research to Improve School Practices. New York: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Method. New Yok: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B. (2007). “What Can Grounded Theorists and Action Researchers Learn from Each Other?” In The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A. Bryant and K. Charmaz, 398–416. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1978. “What Is Action Research in Schools?” Journal of Curriculum Studies 10 (4): 355–357. doi:10.1080/0022027780100407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1985. “Facilitating Action Research in Schools: Some Dilemmas.” In Field Methods in the Study of Education, edited by R. Burgess, 162–180. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1990. La Investigación-acción En Educación. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2007. Reflecting Where the Action Is: The Selected Works. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fendler, L. 2006. “Why Generalisability Is Not Generalisable.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (4): 437–449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00520.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 2001. An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagevik, R., M. Aydeniz, and C.G. Rowell. 2012. “Using Action Research in Middle Level Teacher Education to Evaluate and Deepen Reflective Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (5): 675–684. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. 1989. Investigación en el aula. Guía del profesor. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2010. “What Is to Be Done? The Place of Action Research.” Educational Action Research 18 (4): 417–427. doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.524745.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. McTaggart, and R. Nixon. 2015. “Critical Theory and Critical Participatory Action Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Action Research, edited by H. Bradbury, 453–464. London: Sage.Universitarias (PPU).
   Google Scholar
• Latorre, A. 2003. La Investigación-acción. Conocer Y Cambiar La Práctica Educativa. Barcelona: Grao.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, R., and C. Day. 2000. “Action Research and Reflective Practice: Towards a Holistic View.” Educational Action Research 8 (1): 179–193. doi:10.1080/09650790000200108.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. 2008. “The Praxis of Educating Action Researchers.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 669–681. Second ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, H. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2 (4): 34–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, T., N. Alcorn, and J. O’Neill. 2013. “Ethical Issues in Collaborative Action Research.” Educational Action Research 21 (1): 107–123. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.763448.
   Google Scholar
• Mena, J.J.M., and H. Tillema. 2006. “Studying Studies on Teacher Reflection and Action: An Appraisal of Research Contributions.” Educational Research Review 1 (2): 112–132. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and J. Osborne. 2009. “Research and Practice: A Complex Relationship?” In Quality Research in Literacy and Science Education. International Perspectives and Gold Standards, edited by M. Shelley, L. Yore, L, and B. Hand, 41–61. UK: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S.N.R.C.R., and M.E. Logue. 2009. “Benefits of Collaborative Action Research for the Beginning Teacher.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (2): 344–349. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and D. Burgess. 2008. “Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (4): 18–30. doi:10.1177/160940690800700402.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A., V. Strange, C. Bonell, E. Allen, J. Stephenson, and R.I.P.P.L.E. Study Team. 2006. “Process Evaluation in Randomised Controlled Trials of Complex Interventions.” BMJ 332 (7538): 413–416. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, D., and P. Kariotoglou. 2016. Iterative Design of Teaching-learning Sequences. UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2008. “Concluding Reflections: Whiter Action Research?” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 695–707. Second ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Romera, M.J. 2014. “Action Research in the Field of Science Education: A View from Spanish Journals on Education.” Enseñanza de las Ciencias 32 (1): 229–239. doi:10.5565/rev/ensciencias.529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez Bondía, M.J. 2017. La reflexión en la formación inicial del profesorado en torno a una actividad práctica de campo (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Zaragoza (Spain): University of Zaragoza.
   Google Scholar
• Sáez, M.J., and A.J. Carretero. 1996. “From Action Research to the Classroom Case Study: The History of ANTEC.” Educational Action Research 4 (1): 29–46. doi:10.1080/0965079960040104.
   Google Scholar
• Sandretto, S. 2008. Discussion Paper: Action Research for Social Justice. Wellington, NZ: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. http://www.tlri.org.nz/assets/discussion-paperpdfs/action-research.pd.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, N. 1970. “Whatever Happened to Action Research?” Journal of Social Issues 26 (4): 3–23. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1970.tb01740.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R., D.C. Phillips, L. Towne, and M.J. Feuer. 2003. “On the Science of Education Design Studies.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 25–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001025.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. A Practical Handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. 2009. Case Study. Research in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.L. 2006. “Multiple Methodology in Education Research.” In Complementary Methods in Education Research, edited by J.L. Green, G. Camilli, and P.B. Elmore, 457–475. Washington: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodelling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/09650790802667402.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R.E. 1994. “Case Studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 236–247. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R.E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R.E. 1998. Investigación Por Estudios De Caso. Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1985. “El profesor como tema de investigación y desarrollo.” Revista De Educación 277: 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tomal, D.R. 2010. Action Research for Educators. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wijesundera, S. 2002. “School Improvement: An Action–based Case Study Conducted in a Disadvantaged School in Sri Lanka.” Educational Action Research 10 (2): 169–188. doi:10.1080/09650790200200188.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, K. 2018. “Research Concepts.” In Research Methods. Information, System and Contexts, edited by K. Williamson and G. Johanson, 3–27. Second ed. Cambridge: Chandos Publising Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2006. “Case Study Methods.” In Complementary Methods in Education Research, edited by J.L. Green, G. Camilli, and P.B. Elmore, 111–122. Washington: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2014. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. 2001. “Educational Action Reseach.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 273–283. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar