The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification

References

• Behrman , B. W. and Davey , S. L. 2001 . Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis . Law & Human Behavior , 25 : 475 – 491 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd , C. J. and Reyna , V. F. 1990 . Gist is the grist: Fuzzy trace theory and the new intuitionism . Developmental Review , 10 : 365 – 403 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham , J. C. and Cairns , D. L. 1988 . The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18 : 1394 – 1410 .
   Google Scholar
• Brigham , J. C. , Meissner , C. A. and Wasserman , A. W. 1999 . Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo line-ups . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 13 : S73 – S92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown , E. , Deffenbacher , K. and Sturgill , W. 1977 . Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter . Journal of Applied Psychology , 62 : 311 – 318 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies , G. , Shepherd , J. and Ellis , H. 1979 . Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification . Journal of Applied Psychology , 64 ( 2 ) : 232 – 237 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffenbacher , K. A. , Bornstein , B. H. , & Penrod , S. D. ( 2006 ). Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference . Law & Human Behavior , 30 , 287 – 307 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysart , J. E. , Lindsay , R. C. L. , Hammond , R. and Dupuis , P. 2001 . Mug shot exposure prior to line-up identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects . Journal of Applied Psychology , 86 : 1280 – 1284 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner , J. M. and Richardson-Klavehn , A. 2000 . “ Remembering and knowing ” . In The Oxford handbook of memory , Edited by: Tulving , E. E. , Fergus , E. and Craik , I. M. 229 – 244 . New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gorenstein , G. W. and Ellsworth , P. C. 1980 . Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness . Journal of Applied Psychology , 65 : 616 – 622 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz , T. and Pezdek , K. 2001 . The effect of exposure to multiple line-ups on face identification accuracy . Law & Human Behavior , 25 : 185 – 198 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins , K. D. 1982 . The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations . American Educational Research Journal , 19 ( 1 ) : 5 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , M. K. , Hashtroudi , S. and Lindsay , D. S. 1993 . Source monitoring . Psychological Bulletin , 114 : 3 – 28 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny , D. A. and La Voie , L. 1985 . Interpersonal relations and group processes: Separating individual and group effects . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology , 48 : 339 – 348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLin , O. H. , Meissner , C. A. and Zimmerman , L. A. 2005 . PCE_Basic: A computerized framework for the administration and practical application of research in eyewitness psychology . Behavior Research Methods , 37 : 324 – 334 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLin , O. H. , Zimmerman , L. A. , & Malpass , R. S. ( 2005 ). PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: Computer based line-up administration . Law & Human Behavior , 29 , 203 – 321 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass , R. S. and Lindsay , R. C. L. 1999 . Measuring line-up fairness . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 13 : S1 – S7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler , G. 1980 . Recognising: The judgement of previous occurrence . Psychological Review , 87 : 252 – 271 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner , C. A. , Tredoux , C. G. , Parker , J. F. and MacLin , O. H. 2005 . Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential line-ups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis . Memory & Cognition , 33 : 783 – 792 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon , A. , Hope , L. , Bartlett , J. and Bull , R. 2002 . Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults . Memory & Cognition , 30 : 1219 – 1227 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek , K. and Blandon-Gitlin , I. 2005 . When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy? . Legal & Criminological Psychology , 10 : 247 – 263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna , V. F. and Brainerd , C. J. 1995 . Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis . Learning & Individual Differences , 7 : 1 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay , N. , Dysart , J. , Fulero , S. and Lindsay , R. C. L. 2003 . Eyewitness accuracy rates in police show-ups and line-up presentations: A meta-analytic comparison . Law & Human Behavior , 27 : 523 – 540 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tredoux , C. G. 1998 . Statistical inference on measures of line-up fairness . Law & Human Behavior , 22 : 217 – 237 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfson , A. ( 2002 , December ). A bank robber or falsely accused? Twisted trail of evidence puts man in legal limbo . The Courier-Journal . Retrieved 30 January, 2005 from http://www.courier-journal.com
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas , A. P. 2002 . The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research . Journal of Memory & Language , 46 : 441 – 517 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar