Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing

REFERENCES

• Begg, I., & Roe, H. (1988). On the inhibition of reading by generation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 325–336. doi: 10.1037/h0084191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, I., & Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 553–563. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 977–989. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsch, S., Pesta, B., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201–210. doi: 10.3758/BF03193441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Taikh, A. (2012). Reassessing the basis of the production effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1711–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., Taikh, A., & Fawcett, J.M. (2013). Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, A. D., Rhodes, M. G., & Friedman, M. C. (2013). Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: The use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 41, 28–35. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0249-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341–361. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90118-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danckert, S. L., MacLeod, C. M., & Fernandes, M. A. (2011). Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1374–1386. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0117-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhurst, S. A., & Conway, M. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1088–1098. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001. “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155–161. doi: 10.3758/BF03196152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1, 137–146. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.1.137
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. M. (2013). The production effect benefits performance in between subject designs: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 142, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrin, N. D., Groot, B., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). The production effect in memory: Costs and benefits. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Forrin, N. D., Ozubko, J. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Widening the boundaries of the production effect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1046–1055. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0210-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., & Conway, M. A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalization leads to best retention. Memory & Cognition, 16, 110–119. doi: 10.3758/BF03213478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309–313. doi: 10.3758/BF03197041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., & Hampton, J. A. (1985). Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 732–741. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., & Hampton, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 495–504. doi: 10.2307/1423227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114–122. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, V. H., & Gardiner, J. M. (1991). Components of conscious awareness in a long-term modality effect. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 153–162. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. H., & Edwards, R. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 534–537. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80036-7
   Google Scholar
• Hourihan, K. L. (2009). The power of optimal encoding: Distinctiveness and differentiation defeat directed forgetting. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69, 7159.
   Google Scholar
• Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2008). Directed forgetting meets the production effect: Distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 242–246. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.4.242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (2013). Precision in memory through distinctive processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 10–15. doi: 10.1177/0963721412463228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 81–87. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.8.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 563–571. doi: 10.3758/BF03197079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A. (1973). Remembering operations. Memory & Cognition, 1, 347–355. doi: 10.3758/BF03198119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L.III (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90282-2
   Google Scholar
• Lin, O. Y. H., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Aging and the production effect: A test of the distinctiveness account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 212–216. doi: 10.1037/a0028309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (2011). I said, you said: The production effect gets personal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1197–1202. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0168-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., & Daniels, K. A. (2000). Direct vs indirect tests of memory: Directed forgetting meets the generation effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 354–359. doi: 10.3758/BF03212993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685. doi: 10.1037/a0018785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Ozubko, J. D., Forrin, N. D., & Hourihan, K. L. (2013). Assessing the basis of the production effect: Evaluating the distinctiveness account. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M. (2002). Covert operations: Orthographic recoding as a basis for repetition priming in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 858–871. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Bugg, J. M. (2008). Instability in memory phenomena: A common puzzle and a unifying explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 237–255. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective mnemonic aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 54–65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, W. (2005). Word-imagery effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 716–722. doi: 10.2466/PMS.100.3.716-722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., Gopie, N., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits both recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 40, 326–338. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0165-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and benefits memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.699070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., Major, J., & MacLeod, C. M. ( in press). Remembered study mode: Support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect. Memory.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Oxford, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111–196). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. R. (1992). Evaluating the role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 237–260.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). Recognition memory performance as a function of reported subjective awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1363–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teacher's College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J. (1983). Attributes of memory. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar