1,218
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of similarity on environmental context cueing

, , &
Pages 493-508 | Received 03 Dec 2012, Accepted 17 Apr 2013, Published online: 31 May 2013

REFERENCES

  • Abernethy, E. M. (1940). The effect of changed environmental conditions upon the results of college examinations. Journal of Psychology, 10, 293–301. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1940.9917005
  • Balardin, J. B., Vedana, G., Ludwig, A., de Lima, D. B., Argimon, I., Schneider, R., … Bromberg, E. (2009). Contextual memory and encoding strategies in young and older adults with and without depressive symptoms. Aging & Mental Health, 13, 313–318. doi: 10.1080/13607860802534583
  • Barch, D. M., Yodkovik, N., Sypher-Locke, H., & Hanewinkel, M. (2008). Intrinsic motivation in schizophrenia: Relationships to cognitive function, depression, anxiety, and personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 776–787. doi: 10.1037/a0013944
  • Bjork R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Calkins, M. W. (1894). Association: I. Psychological Review, I, 476–483.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Davachi, L. (2006). Item, context, and relational episodic encoding in humans. Neuropsychology, 18, 693–700.
  • Eich, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 764–770. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.764
  • Farnsworth, P. R. (1934). Examinations in familiar and unfamiliar surroundings. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 128–129. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1934.9921593
  • Fernandez, A. & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333–345. doi: 10.3758/BF03202501
  • Finley, J. R., Benjamin, A. S., Hays, M. J., Bjork, R. A., & Kornell, N. (2011). Benefits of accumulating versus diminishing cues in recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.006
  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.401
  • Gibson, E. J. (1941). Retroactive inhibition as a function of degree of generalization between tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 93–115. doi: 10.1037/h0056366
  • Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1
  • Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., & Renzaglia, G. J. (1983). Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 413–418.
  • Glenberg, A. M., & Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 3–24. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.3
  • Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology, 71, 99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02735.x
  • Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2007). I'd know that face anywhere! Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1085–1089. doi: 10.3758/BF03193095
  • Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgements of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528–551. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
  • Hockley, W. E. (2008). The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1412–1429. doi: 10.1037/a0013016
  • Howard, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112, 75–116. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.75
  • Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299. doi: 10.1006/jmps.2001.1388
  • Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208–233. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.208
  • Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 21–38. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.21
  • Kalisch, R., Korenfeld, E., Stephan, K. E., Weiskopf, N., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Context-dependent human extinction memory is mediated by a ventromedial prefrontal and hippocampal network. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9503–9511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-06.2006.
  • Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM model of false recall. Psychological Review, 114, 954–993. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.954
  • Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58–69. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.58
  • Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  • Lamy, D., Goshen-Kosover, A., Aviani, N., Harari, H., & Levkovitz, H. (2008). Implicit memory for spatial context in depression and schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 954–961. doi: 10.1037/a0013867
  • Levens, S. M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Impaired selection of relevant positive information in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 757–766. doi: 10.1037/a0017206
  • Macken, W. J. (2002). Environmental context and recognition: The role of recollection and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 153–161. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.153
  • McClure, M. M., Barch, D. M., Flory, J. D., Harvey, P. D., & Siever, L. J. (2008). Context processing in schizotypal personality disorder: Evidence of specificity of impairment to the schizophrenia spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 342–354. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.342
  • Mineka, S. M., Mystkowski, J. L., Hladek, D., & Rodriguez, B. I. (1999). The effects of changing contexts on return of fear following exposure therapy for spider fear. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 599–604. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.4.599
  • Murdock, B. B. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183–203. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.183
  • Murdock, B. B. (2006). Decision-making models of remember–know judgements: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004). Psychological Review, 113, 648–656. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.648
  • Murnane, K., Phelps, M. P., & Malmberg, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403–415. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.403
  • Mystkowski, J. L., Craske, M. G., Echiverri, H. M., & Labus, J. S. (2006). Mental reinstatement of context and return of fear in spider-fearful participants. Behavior Therapy, 37, 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.04.001
  • Nagge, J. W. (1935). An experimental test of the theory of associative interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 663–682. doi: 10.1037/h0054006
  • Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1994). Norms of paired associate recall during multi trial learning of Swahili–English translation equivalents. Memory, 2, 325–335. doi: 10.1080/09658219408258951
  • Newman, S. E. & Taylor, L. R. (1963). Context effects in paired-associate learning as a function of element-sharing among stimulus terms. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 243–249. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80002-X
  • Postman, L. (1951). The generalization gradient in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 231–235. doi: 10.1037/h0057743
  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.93
  • Rutherford, A. (2004). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory effects: An examination of ICE model and cue-overload hypotheses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 107–127. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000152
  • Sahakyan, L. (2004). Destructive effects of ‘forget’ instructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 555–559. doi: 10.3758/BF03196610
  • Sahakyan, L., & Kelley, C. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1064–1072. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1064
  • Saufley, W. H.Jr., Otaka, S. R., & Bavaresco, J. L. (1985). Context effects: Classroom tests and contextual independence. Memory & Cognition, 13, 522–528. doi: 10.3758/BF03198323
  • Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893–912. doi: 10.1037/a0013396
  • Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460–471. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.460
  • Smith, S. M. (1994). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In P. Morris & M. Gruneberg (Eds.), Theoretical aspects of memory (2nd ed., pp. 168–195). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342–353. doi: 10.3758/BF03197465
  • Smith, S. M., & Manzano, I. (2010). Video context-dependent recall. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 292–301; 10.3758/BRM.42.1.292.
  • Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 125–139. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350060204
  • Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220. doi: 10.3758/BF03196157
  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Hirshman, E. (1994). Dissociations among implicit and explicit memory tasks: The role of stimulus similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 150–160. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.150
  • Talamini, L. M., & Meeter, M. (2009). Dominance of objects over context in a mediotemporal lobe model of schizophrenia. PloS ONE, 4, e6505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006505
  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 382–402). New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.
  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Vakil, E., Hornik, C., & Levy, D. A. (2008). Conceptual and perceptual similarity between encoding and retrieval contexts and recognition memory context effects in older and younger adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63, 171–175. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.3.P171
  • Wagner, A. D., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory. Functional-MRI evidence for context-dependent retrieval processes. Brain, 121, 1985–2002. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.10.1985. PMID 9798751.
  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
  • Yum, K. S. (1931). An experimental test of the law of assimilation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 68–82. doi: 10.1037/h0071335

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.