Remembered study mode: Support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect

REFERENCES

• Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548–564. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modelling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57–86. doi: 10.3758/BF03210812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197–215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201–210. doi: 10.3758/BF03193441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1999). An alternative conceptualisation to memory “strength” in reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 804–809. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Taikh, A. (2012). Reassessing the basis of the production effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1711–1719. doi: 10.1037/a0028466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, A. D., Rhodes, M. G., & Friedman, M. C. (2013). Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: The use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgements of learning. Memory & Cognition, 41, 28–35. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0249-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341–361. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90118-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., Prinzmetal, W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). Using Excel to estimate parameters from observed data: An example from source memory data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 30, 517–526. doi: 10.3758/BF03200685
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155–161. doi: 10.3758/BF03196152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523–533. doi: 10.3758/BF03200940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials [Imagery and motor processes in memory of verbal material]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511–533.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, J. M. (2013). The production effect benefits performance in between-subject designs: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologia, 142, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrin, N. D., Jonker, T. R., & MacLeod, C. M. ( in press). Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs. non-elaborative processing. Memory.
   Google Scholar
• Forrin, N. D., Ozubko, J. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Widening the boundaries of the production effect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1046–1055. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0210-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, N., Phillippe, R., Dapriti, E., Dalery, J., Marie-Cardine, M., & Georgieff, N. (2000). Confusion between silent and overt reading in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 41, 357–364. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00067-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., & Conway, M. A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalisation leads to best retention. Memory & Cognition, 16, 110–119. doi: 10.3758/BF03213478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, A. D., Hawkins, R. O., Sheeley, W., Reynolds, J. R., Jenkins, S., Schmitt, A. J., & Martin, D. A. (2011). An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using Maze assessment procedures. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 4–13. doi: 10.1002/pits.20543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667–680. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Johnson, M. K., Kim, J. K., Phelps, E. A., Risse, G., & Volpe, B. T. (1986). Recognition and recall in amnesics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 445–451. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Johnson, M. K., Phelps, E. A., & Volpe, B. T. (1988). More on recognition and recall in amnesics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 758–762. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockley, W. E. (2008). The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1412–1429. doi: 10.1037/a0013016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. H., & Edwards, R. E. (1972). Pronunciation effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 534–537. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80036-7
   Google Scholar
• Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2008). Directed forgetting meets the production effect: Distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 242–246. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.4.242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In R. R. Hunt & J. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 3–25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R. (2013). Precision in memory through distinctive processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 10–15. doi: 10.1177/0963721412463228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. (Eds.) Distinctiveness and memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, O., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Aging and the production effect: A test of the distinctiveness account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 212–216. doi: 10.1037/a0028309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, P. A., & MacLeod, C. M. (1998). The influence of attention at encoding on direct and indirect remembering. Acta Psychologica, 98, 291–310. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00047-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (2011). I said, you said: The production effect gets personal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1197–1202. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0168-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M., Gopie, N., Hourihan, K. L., Neary, K. R., & Ozubko, J. D. (2010). The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 671–685. doi: 10.1037/a0018785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., Gopie, N., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits both recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 40, 326–338. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0165-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.699070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozubko, J. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2010). The production effect in memory: Evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1543–1547. doi: 10.1037/a0020604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Oxford, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 460–471. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.460
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, H. D., Cohen, R. L., Guynn, M. J., Engelkamp, J., Kormi-Nouri, R., & Foley, M. A. (2001). Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar