Age differences in prospective memory for everyday life intentions: A diary approach

REFERENCES

• Almeida, D. M., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9(1), 41–55. doi:10.1177/1073191102009001006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Handanweisung [NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) adapted from Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler [Research methods and evaluation for humanities and social scientists]. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Breitling, L. P., Wolf, M., Müller, H., Raum, E., Kliegel, M., & Brenner, H. (2010). Large-scale application of a telephone-based test of cognitive functioning in older adults. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 30, 309–316. doi:10.1159/000319896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L., Mikels, J. A., & Mather, M. (2006). Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation and emotion. In J. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 343–362). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T.., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. A. (1988). Memory for future intentions: Investigating pulses and steps. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Vol. 1. Current research and issues (pp. 371–376). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. A., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). Recollecting naturally-occuring intentions: A study of cognitive and affective factors. Memory, 1(2), 107–126. doi:10.1080/09658219308258227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, A. S., Rafaeli, E., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., & Reis, H. T. (2006). Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 87–105. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2008). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 27–39. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihle, A., Hering, A., Mahy, C. E. V., Bisiacchi, P. S., & Kliegel, M. (2013). Adult age differences, response management, and cue focality in event-based prospective memory: A meta-analysis on the role of task order specificity. Psychology and Aging, 28, 714–720. doi:10.1037/a0033653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihle, A., Schnitzspahn, K. M., Rendell, P. G., Luong, C., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Age benefits in everyday prospective memory: The influence of personal task importance, use of reminders and everyday stress. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 84–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegel, M., Jäger, T., & Phillips, L. (2008). Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A metaanalysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues. Psychology and Aging, 23, 203–208. doi:10.1037/0882–7974.23.1.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegel, M., Martin, M., & Jäger, T. (2007). Development and validation of the cognitive telephone screening instrument for the assessment of cognitive function across adulthood (COGTEL). The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141, 147–170. doi:10.3200/JRLP.141.2.147-172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2008). Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kvavilashvili, L., & Fisher, L. (2007). Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of cues, ongoing activity, age and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 112–132. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 633–643. doi:10.3758/BF03211383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maylor, E. A. (1990). Age and prospective memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 471–493. doi:10.1080/14640749008401233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Rendell, P. G. (2008). The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory a multiprocess explanation. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 141–160). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Willis, S. L., Morrow, D., Diehl, M., & Gaines, C. (1994). Cognitive function and medication usage in older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 13(1), 39–57. doi:10.1177/073346489401300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penningroth, S. L., Scott, W. D., & Freuen, M. (2011). Social motivation in prospective memory: Higher importance ratings and reported performance rates for social tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 65, 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., & Martin, M. (2008). Adult aging and prospective memory: The importance of ecological validity. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein, (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 161–185). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendell, P. G., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Virtual week and actual week: Age-related differences in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S43–S62. doi:10.1002/acp.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzspahn, K. M., Ihle, A., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., & Kliegel, M. (2011). The age-prospective memory-paradox: A comprehensive exploration of possible mechanisms. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 583–592. doi:10.1017/S1041610210001651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzspahn, K. M., Stahl, C., Zeintl, M., Kaller, C. P., & Kliegel, M. (2013). The role of shifting updating and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1544–1553. doi:10.1037/a0030579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, U., Kliegel, M., Luszczynska, A., & Knoll, N. (2012). Associations between received social support and positive and negative affect: Evidence for age differences from a daily diary study. European Journal of Aging, 9, 361–371. doi:10.1007/s10433-012-0236-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J., Hofer, S. M., & Stawski, R. S. (2006). Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition. Psychology and Aging, 21, 545–557. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., & Borchelt, M. (1999). Morbidität, Medikation und Funktionalität im Alter [Morbidity, medication and functionality in aging]. In K. U. Mayer & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Die Berliner Altersstudie [The Berlin Aging Study] (pp. 151–184). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised Edition. Manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale – Revised Edition. Manual. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. A. H., & Park, D. C. (2008). Prospective memory and health behaviors: Context trumps cognition. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 391–407). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, S. P., Weinborn, M., Velnoweth, A., Rooney, A., & Bucks, R. S. (2012). Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18(1), 134–138. doi:10.1017/S1355617711001263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar