REFERENCES
- Allen, R. J., & Waterman, A. H. (2015). How does enactment affect the ability to follow instructions in working memory? Memory & Cognition, 43(3), 555–561.
- Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
- Baddeley, A. D., Allen, R. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2011). Binding in visual working memory: The role of the episodic buffer. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1393–1400.
- Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.
- Frencham, K. A., Fox, A. M., & Maybery, M. T. (2003). The hand movement test as a tool in neuropsychological assessment: Interpretation within a working memory theoretical framework. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(4), 633–641.
- Frencham, K. A., Fox, A. M., & Maybery, M. T. (2004). Effects of verbal labeling on memory for hand movements. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(3), 355–361.
- Gimenes, G., Pennequin, V., & Sorel, O. (2013). Division of the articulatory loop according to sensory modality using double dissociation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(7), 808–815.
- Miyahara, M. (2007). Aging influences on working memory for hand movements: A test of the metamemory deficit hypothesis. Experimental Aging Research, 33(4), 417–428.
- Miyahara, M., Kitada, R., Sasaki, A. T., Okamoto, Y., Tanabe, H. C., & Sadato, N. (2013). From gestures to words: Spontaneous verbal labeling of complex sequential hand movements reduces fMRI activation of the imitation-related regions. Neuroscience Research, 75(3), 228–238.
- Smyth, M. M., Pearson, N. A., & Pendleton, L. R. (1988). Movement and working memory: Patterns and positions in space. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 40(3), 497–514.
- Wilson, M. (2001). Perceiving imitatible stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 543–553.
- Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1997a). A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 25(3), 313–320.
- Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1997b). Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of the working memory system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(3), 121–130.
- Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1998). Erratum to: A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 187.
- Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (2003). The effect of irrelevant visual input on working memory for sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(2), 97–103.
- Wilson, M., & Fox, G. (2007). Working memory for language is not special: Evidence for an articulatory loop for novel stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 470–473.