References
- Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41, 392–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0272-7
- Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
- Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study. Memory & Cognition, 42, 481–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0 doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0
- Doyle, M. E., & Hourihan, K. L. (2015). Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: How success affects future behaviour. Memory. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1086805
- Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13, 597–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597 doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597
- Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.462 doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.462
- Homa, D., & Cultice, J. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 83–94.
- Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Coane, J. H. (2010). Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1441–1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020636
- Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 97–103. doi: 10.1002/acp.1801
- Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017341 doi: 10.1037/a0017341
- Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157–175. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0009
- Kirchoff, B. K., Delaney, P. F., Horton, M., & Dellinger-Johnston, R. (2014). Optimizing learning of scientific category knowledge in the classroom: The case of plant identification. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 425–436.
- Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
- Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36
- Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x
- Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (in press). Self-regulated learning: An overview of theory and data. In J. Dunlosky & S. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.23
- Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609
- Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Participants’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210902832915 doi: 10.1080/09658210902832915
- Little, J. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Individual differences in category learning: Memorization versus rule abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 43, 283–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0475-1 doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0475-1
- McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462–476. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
- Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 530–542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530
- Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
- Noh, S. M., Yan, V. X., Vendetti, M. S., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Multilevel induction of categories: Venomous snakes hijack the learning of lower category levels. Psychological Science, 25, 1592–1599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535938 doi: 10.1177/0956797614535938
- Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025953 doi: 10.1037/h0025953
- Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015). The power of examples: Illustrative examples enhance conceptual learning of declarative concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 483–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3 doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3
- Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615–625. doi: 10.1037/a0013684
- Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 355–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3 doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9201-3
- Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 900–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000001 doi: 10.1037/edu0000001
- Son, L. K., & Kornell, N. (2009). Simultaneous decisions at study: Time allocation, ordering, and spacing. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 237–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9049-1 doi: 10.1007/s11409-009-9049-1
- Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2015). Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: Will task experience improve its resolution? Acta Psychologica, 155, 8–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.011
- Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Self-regulated learning of a natural category: Do people interleave or block exemplars during study? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 356–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0319-6 doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0319-6
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. London: Penguin Books.
- Thomas, R. C., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2015). Prior experience shapes metacognitive judgments at the category level: The role of testing and category difficulty. Metacognition and Learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9144-4
- Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: An investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging. Memory & Cognition, 39, 750–763. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0063-y doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0063-y
- Wahlheim, C. N., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: Evidence for variability neglect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 703–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0180-2 doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0180-2
- Wahlheim, C. N., McDaniel, M. A., Little, J. L. (in press). Category learning strategies in younger and older adults: Rule abstraction and memorization. Psychology & Aging.
- Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568–579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.687052 doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.687052