267
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Test-potentiated learning of motor sequences

&
Pages 326-334 | Received 28 Oct 2015, Accepted 23 Mar 2016, Published online: 21 Apr 2016

References

  • Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
  • Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013b). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940–945. doi:10.1037/a0029199
  • Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 3, 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.002
  • Boutin, A., Panzer, S., & Blandin, Y. (2013). Retrieval practice in motor learning. Human Movement Science, 32, 1201–1213. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2012.10.002
  • Boutin, A., Panzer, S., Salesse, R. N., & Blandin, Y. (2012). Testing promotes effector transfer. Acta Psychologica, 141, 400–407. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.014
  • Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 1118–1133. doi:10.1037/a0019902
  • Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 279–283. doi:10.1177/0963721412452728
  • Carpenter, S. K., & Kelly, J. W. (2012). Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 443–448. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0221-2
  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
  • Engelkamp, J. (2001). Action memory: A system-oriented approach. In H. D. Zimmer, R. Cohen, M. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 49–96). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Hinze, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2011). Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests. Memory, 19(3), 290–304. doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.560121
  • Hinze, S. R., Wiley, J., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2013). The importance of constructive comprehension processes in learning from tests. Journal of Memory & Language, 69, 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.03.002
  • Irtel, H. (2007). PXLab: The Psychological Experiments Laboratory [online]. Version 2.1.11. Mannheim (Germany): University of Mannheim. Available from <http://www.pxlab.de>.
  • Izawa, C. (1966). Reinforcement-test sequences in paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports, 18, 879–919. doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.879
  • Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to the test … or testing to teach? Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 307–329. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
  • Jönsson, F. U., Kubik, V., Larsson Sundqvist, M., Todorov, I., & Jonsson, B. (2014). How crucial is the response format for the testing effect? Psychological Research, 78, 623–633. doi:10.1007/s00426-013-0522-8
  • Kang, S. H. K. (2010). Enhancing visuospatial learning: The benefit of retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1009–1017. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.1009
  • Kang, S. H. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Pashler, H. (2011). Effects of testing on learning of functions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 998–1005. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0113-x
  • Kelly, J. W., Carpenter, S. K., & Sjolund, L. A. (2015). Retrieval enhances route knowledge acquisition, but only when movement errors are prevented. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41, 1540–1547. doi:10.1037/a0038685
  • Kormi-Nouri, R. & Nilsson, L.-G. (2001). The motor component is not crucial! In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct from episodic memory? (pp. 97–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kornell, N., Klein, P. J., & Rawson, K. A. (2015). Retrieval attempts enhance learning, but retrieval success (versus failure) does not matter. Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41(1), 283–294. doi:10.1037/a0037850
  • Kromann, C. B., Jensen, M. L., & Ringsted, C. (2009). The effect of testing on skills learning. Medical Education, 43, 21–27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03245.x
  • Kubik, V., Jönsson, F. U., & Arshamian, A. (2016). Putting testing into action: Motor retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Kubik, V., Nilsson, L.-G., Olofsson, J. K., & Jönsson, F. U. (2015). Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant material: On the influence of recall type. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 475–481. doi:10.1111/sjop.12238
  • Kubik, V., Obermeyer, S., Meier, J., & Knopf, M. (2014). The enactment effect in a multi-trial free-recall paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 781–787. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.959018
  • Kubik, V., Olofsson, J. K., Nilsson, L.-G., & Jönsson, F. U. (2016). Putting action memory to the test: Testing affects subsequent restudy but not long-term forgetting of action events. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 209–219. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1111378
  • Kubik, V., Söderlund, H., Nilsson, L.-G., & Jönsson, F. U. (2014). Individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases. Experimental Psychology, 61, 347–355. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000254
  • McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R. C., Agarwal, P. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 360–372. doi:10.1002/acp.2914
  • McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012). Using quizzes to enhance summative assessment performance in a web-based class: An experimental study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 1, 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001
  • Nyberg, L., Persson, J., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2002). Individual differences in memory enhancement by encoding enactment: Relationships to adult age and biological factors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 835–839. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00074-X
  • Pan, S. C., Wong, C. M., Potter, Z. E., Mejia, J., & Rickard, T. C. (2016). Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates? Memory & Cognition, 44, 24–36. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0547-x
  • Putnam, A. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect? Memory & Cognition, 41, 36–48. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0245-x
  • Roediger, H. L. III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
  • Roediger, H. L. III, & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 242–248. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
  • Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. doi:10.1037/a0037559
  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2009). Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modelling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 61–83. doi:10.1080/09541440701868668
  • Tempel, T., Aslan, A., & Frings, C. (in press). Competition dependence of retrieval-induced forgetting in motor memory. Memory & Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0578-3
  • Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (2013). Resolving interference between body movements: Retrieval-induced forgetting of motor sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1152–1161. doi:10.1037/a0030336
  • Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (2014a). Interference within hands: Retrieval-induced forgetting of left and right hand movements. Acta Psychologica, 148, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.003
  • Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (2014b). Forgetting motor programmes: Retrieval dynamics in procedural memory. Memory, 22, 1116–1125. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.871293
  • Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (2015). Categorization by movement direction: Retrieval-induced forgetting of motor sequences grouped by motion features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 473–486. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.945098
  • Tempel, T., & Frings, C. (in press). How motor practice shapes memory: Retrieval but not extra study can cause forgetting. Memory. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1059858
  • Tempel, T., Loran, I., & Frings, C. (2015). Dancing your moves away: How memory retrieval shapes complex motor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 300–312. doi:10.1037/xap0000052
  • Tran, R., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2014). Retrieval practice: The lack of transfer to deductive inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0646-x
  • Vaughn, K. E., & Rawson, K. A. (2014). Effects of criterion level on associative memory: Evidence for associative asymmetry. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 14–26. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.004
  • Vestergren, P., & Nyberg, L. (2014). Testing alters brain activity during subsequent restudy: Evidence for test-potentiated learning. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.11.001
  • Wooldridge, C. L., Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A., & Liu, Y. (2014). The testing effect with authentic educational materials: A cautionary note. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 3, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.001
  • Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words: Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulations or the result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.