Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory

References

• Balota, D. A., & Neely, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 576–587. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.576
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Trieman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, S. F. C. (1932/1967). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories. A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1–46. doi: 10.1037/h0027577
   Google Scholar
• Begg, I., & Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 553–563. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164–169. doi:10.111/1467-8721.00192 doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552. doi: 10.1037/a0024140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coane, J. H., Huff, M. J., & Hutchison, K. A. (2016). The ironic effect of guessing: Increased false memory for mediated lists in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 23, 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805
   Google Scholar
• Congleton, A., & Rajaram, S. (2012). The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: The roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization. Memory & Cognition, 40, 528–539. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0168-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22. doi: 10.1037/h0046671
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 120–128. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114–122. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.50.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5–16. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition, 40, 505–513. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 290–296. doi: 10.1037/a0028468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelser, B. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2012). Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it. Memory & Cognition, 40, 514–527. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Balota, D. A., & Hutchison, K. A. (2016). The costs and benefits of testing and guessing on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1559–1572. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2013). When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1246–1256. doi: 10.1037/a0031338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2014). All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 43–58. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Coane, J. H., Hutchison, K. A., Grasser, E. B., & Blais, J. E. (2012). Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: Effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1246–1256. doi: 10.1037/a0028476
   Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013). The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 41, 820–831. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M. J., Meade, M. L., & Hutchison, K. A. (2011). Age-related differences in guessing on free and forced recall tests. Memory (Hove, England), 19, 317–330. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.568494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90138-9
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Measuring recollection: Strategic versus automatic influences of associative context. In V. Carlo & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 661–679). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. K., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Mozer, M. C. (2011). Does incorrect guessing impair fact learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 48–59. doi: 10.1037/a0021977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, H. (1955). Learning and retaining verbal material. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 81–100. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1955.tb00527.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. M., & Sahakyan, L. (2003). Memory, monitoring, and control in the attainment of memory accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 704–721. doi:10/1016/S0749-596X(02)00504-1 doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00504-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989–998. doi: 10.1037/a0015729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208. doi: 10.3758/BF03204766
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on practiceal Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, null–hypothesis.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 212–230. doi:10.1006/jmla.196.0012 doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, M. L., & RoedigerIII, H. L. (2006). The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults. The American Journal of Psychology, 119, 433–462. doi: 10.2307/20445352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9
   Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H., & Balota, D. A. (1981). Test-expectancy and semantic-organization effects in recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 283–300. doi: 10.3758/BF03196962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansky, A., Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pearlman-Avnion, S. (2009). Memory accuracy in old age: Cognitive, metacognitive, and neurocognitive determinants. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 303–329. doi: 10.1080/09541440802281183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 644–667. doi: 10.1037/a0033194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu, X., & Tse, C.-S. (2014). The influence of intentional versus incidental retrieval practices on the role of recollection in test-enhanced learning. Cognitive Processing, 15, 55–64. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0580-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335. doi: 10.1126/science.1191465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 283–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoedigerIII, H. L., & Karpicke D. J. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoedigerIII, H. L., & McDermott B. K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. doi: 10.1037.0278-7393.21.4.803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoedigerIII, H. L., & Payne, G. D. (1985). Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: A puzzle for generate/recognize theories. Memory & Cognition, 13, 1–7. doi: 10.3758/BF03198437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoedigerIII, H. L., Wheeler, M. A., & Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering, knowing and reconstructing the past. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 97–134). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effects of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. doi: 10.1037/a0037559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slamecka, J. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K., McDermott, K. B., & RoedigerIII, H. L. (2007). Expectation of a final cumulative test enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1007–1013. doi: 10.3758/BF03193473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, C.-S., Balota, D. A., & RoedigerIII, H. L. (2010). The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 833–845. doi: 10.1037/a0019933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde, J. P., Rawson, K. A., & & Dunlosky, J. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervaise problems of p values. Behavioral Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-10-0049-5
   Google Scholar
• Yan, V. X., Yu, Y., Garcia, M. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention? Memory & Cognition, 42, 1373–1383. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0454-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaromb, F. M., & RoedigerIII, H. L. (2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995–1008. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar