Structured word-lists as a model of basic schemata: deviations from content and order in a repeated event paradigm

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, W. K., Brewer, W. F., & Mooney, R. J. (1992). Schema acquisition from a single example. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, H. (2009). Remembering: A theoretical interface between memory and social psychology. Social Psychology, 40, 164–175. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory: Dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 28, 41–100. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80062-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F. (2000). Bartlett's concept of the schema and its impact on theories of knowledge representation in contemporary cognitive psychology. In A. Saito (Ed.), Bartlett, culture and cognition (pp. 69–89). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED248491).
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubacher, S. P., Glisic, U., Roberts, K. P., & Powell, M. (2011). Children's ability to recall unique aspects of one occurrence of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351–358. doi: 10.1002/acp.1696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimbalo, R. S., Nowak, B. I., & Stringfield, C. (1978). Isolation effect: Overall list facilitation and debilitation in short-term memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 99, 251–256. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1978.9710510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (2006). The embodiment of reconciliation: Order and change in the work of Frederic Bartlett. History of Psychology, 9, 290–312. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.9.4.290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connolly, D. A., Gordon, H. M., Woiwod, D. M., & Price, H. L. (2016). What children recall about a repeated event when one instance is different from the others. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1038–1051. doi: 10.1037/dev0000137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1994). Recognition and recall of irrelevant and interruptive atypical actions in script-based stories. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 757–775. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., & Jergovic, D. (1996). Children’s memory for atypical actions in script-based stories: An examination of the disruption effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 134–152. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., Malmstrom, T., Burdenand, M. J., & Luo, Z. (2000). Younger and older adults’ recall of typical and atypical actions from script-based text: Evidence for interruption and bizarre-imagery effects. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 409–430. doi: 10.1080/036107300750015787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiani, M., & Donchin, E. (1995). Encoding processes and memory organization: A model of the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 224–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. J., & Boyer-Pennington, M. E. (1999). Remembering specific episodes of a scripted event. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 266–288. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. J., & Goodman, G. S. (1992). Developmental changes in event memory. Child Development, 63, 173–187. doi: 10.2307/1130911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, W. H., Bolin, J. E., & Kelley, K. (2014). Multilevel modeling using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, V. E., & Gilboa, A. (2014). What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia, 53, 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, P. A., Blank, H., & Luna, K. (2017). Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 417–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the “coordinates of truth”. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 253–271. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupbach, A., Hardt, O., Gomez, R., & Nadel, L. (2008). The dynamics of memory: Context-dependent updating. Learning & Memory, 15, 574–579. doi: 10.1101/lm.1022308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean, C. L., Coburn, P. I., Chong, K., & Connolly, D. A. (2018). Breaking script: Deviations and postevent information in adult memory for a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 474–486. doi: 10.1002/acp.3421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–324. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1974). A framework for representing knowledge. Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, G. V., Graesser, A. C., Zimmerman, J. A., & Riha, J. (1985). Script processing in a natural situation. Memory & Cognition, 13, 140–144. doi: 10.3758/BF03197006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørby, S. (2015). Why forget? On the adaptive value of memory loss. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 551–578. doi: 10.1177/1745691615596787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. (2017). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-131. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363. doi: 10.1037/h0025953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postman, L. (1971). Organization and interference. Psychological Review, 78, 290–302. doi: 10.1037/h0031031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger IIIH. L. (2017). When misinformation improves memory: The effects of recollecting change. Psychological Science, 28, 36–46. doi: 10.1177/0956797616672268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Renoult, L., Davidson, P. S., Palombo, D. J., Moscovitch, M., & Levine, B. (2012). Personal semantics: At the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 550–558. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1975). Scripts, plans, and knowledge. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1 (pp. 151–157). San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1624626.1624649
   Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42–61. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., & Brewer, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1962). Subjective organization in free recall of “unrelated” words. Psychological Review, 69, 344–354. doi: 10.1037/h0043150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kesteren, M. T., Rijpkema, M., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernández, G. (2013). Consolidation differentially modulates schema effects on memory for items and associations. PloS One, 8, e56155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagoner, B. (2013). Bartlett’s concept of schema in reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 23, 553–575. doi: 10.1177/0959354313500166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 77, 1–15. doi: 10.1037/h0028569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willén, R. M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Fisher, R. P. (2015). Facilitating particularization of repeated similar events with context-specific cues. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 28–37. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar