Lessons for the courtroom from the study of Flashbulb memory: an integrative review

References

• Allwood, C. M., Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). The cognitive interview: Effects on the realism in witnesses’ confidence in their free recall. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, R., Seijó, A., & Novo, M. (2010). Testimony validity: A comparative study of legal and empirical criteria. Psychology in Spain, 14, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Baugerud, G. A., Magnussen, S., & Melinder, A. (2014). High accuracy but low consistency in children’s long-term recall of a real-life stressful event. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 357–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors’ evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, A., Bozza, S., & Taroni, F. (2008). Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: Underlying logic and argumentative implications. Forensic Science International, 177, 120–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., III (1988). Flashbulb memories for the space shuttle disaster: A tale of two theories. Cognition, 29, 179–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., Gratz, S., & Cross, V. S. (2007). The effects of affect and input source on flashbulb memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1023–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., & Symons, V. L. (1992). Flashbulb memories: Confidence, consistency, and quality. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall. Studies of “flashbulb memories” (pp. 65–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 353–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, J. C., & Wolfskeil, M. P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitnes identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5, 73–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. C., Dolcos, F., Gonsalves, B. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2013). On opposing effects of emotion on contextual or relational memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, SÅ. (1989). Flashbulb memories: Special, but not so special. Memory & Cognition, 17, 435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifasefi, S. L., Garry, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). Setting the record (or video camera) straight on memory: The video camera model of memory and other memory myths. In S. Della Sala (Ed.), Tall talks about the mind and brain: Separating fact from fiction (pp. 60–75). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A. (1995). Flashbulb memories. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., Anderson, S. J., Larsen, S. F., Donelly, C. M., McDaniel, M. A., McClelland, A. G. R., … Logie, R. H. (1994). The formation of flashbulb memories. Memory & Cognition, 22, 326–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Rubin, D. C. (1993). The structure of autobiographical memory. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 103–137). Hove: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: Correspondence and coherence. Social Cognition, 22, 491–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curci, A. (2005). Latent variable models for the measurement of Flashbulb memories: A comparative approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curci, A., & Conway, M. A. (2013). Playing the flashbulb memory game: A comment on Cubelli and Della Sala. Cortex, 49, 352–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curci, A., Lanciano, T., Battista, F., Guaragno, S., & Ribatti, R. M. (2019). Accuracy, confidence, and experiential criteria for lie detection through a videotaped interview. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curci, A., Lanciano, T., Maddalena, C., Mastandrea, S., & Sartori, G. (2015). Flashbulb memories of the Pope’s resignation: Explicit and implicit measures across differing religious groups. Memory, 23, 529–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Influence of emotion on memory for temporal information. Emotion, 5, 503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., & Read, J. D. (2011). After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 200–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirnberger, G., Hesselmann, G., Roiser, J. P., Preminger, S., Jahanshahi, M., & Paz, R. (2012). Give it time: Neural evidence for distorted time perception and enhanced memory encoding in emotional situations. NeuroImage, 63, 591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2004). How should tribunals evaluate the evidence? Paper presented at 7th Annual Tribunal’s Conference of the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration, Brisbane, 11 June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 501–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L., Monahan, J., & Slobogin, C. (2014). Group to individual (G2i) inference in scientific expert testimony. The University of Chicago Law Review, 81, 417–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Brewer, N., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. In T. Williamson, R. Bull, & T. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 121–136). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fivush, R., Habermas, T., & Reese, E. (2019). Retelling lives: Narrative style and stability of highly emotional events over time. Qualitative Psychology, 6(2), 156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Fryman, H. M., Marsil, D. F., & Yozwiak, J. A. (2003). Big girls don’t cry: The effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1311–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Nolan, M. A., & van Gijn-Grosvenor, E. L. (2017). Empirical guidance on the effects of child sexual abuse on memory and complainants’ evidence. Sidney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. A., Kukucka, J. P., & Hawks, I. M. (2013). Co-witness confidence, conformity, and eyewitness memory: An examination of normative and informational social influences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Jonsson, A. C., & Allwood, C. M. (2004). The cognitive interview and its effects on witnesses’ confidence. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2013). Interrogative suggestibility and compliance. In A. M. Ridley, F. Gabbert, & D. J. La Rooy (Eds.), Suggestibility in legal contexts. Psychological research and forensic implications (pp. 45–61). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2017). Inconsistencies across repeated eyewitness interviews: Supportive negative feedback can make witnesses change their memory reports. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydon, G., & Powell, A. (2018). Written-response interview protocols: An innovative approach to confidential reporting and victim interviewing in sexual assault investigations. Policing and Society, 28(6), 631–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Buckner, R. L., Budson, A. E., Cuc, A., Gabrieli, J. D., … Meksin, R. (2009). Long-term memory for the terrorist attack of September 11: Flashbulb memories, event memories, and the factors that influence their retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Meksin, R., Vaidya, C. J., Johnson, M. K., Mitchell, K. J., … Mather, M. (2015). A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 604–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, M., Bohannon IIIJ. N., & Aue, W. (2009). Measures of Flashbulb memory: Are elaborate memories consistently accurate? In O. Luminet & A. Curci (Eds.), Flashbulb memories: New issues and new perspectives (pp. 99–122). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. (1968). Decision theory and the factfinding process. Stanford Law Review, 20, 1065–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Johnson, S. D. (2000). Lawyers’ questioning: The effect of confusing questions on witness confidence and accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 629–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson, J., & Allwood, C. M. (2014). Opinions of legal professionals: Comparing child and adult witnesses’ memory report capabilities. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6, 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köber, C., Schmiedek, F., & Habermas, T. (2015). Characterizing lifespan development of three aspects of coherence in life narratives: A cohort-sequential study. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 260–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krix, A. C., Sauerland, M., Raymaekers, L. H., Memon, A., Quaedflieg, C. W., & Smeets, T. (2016). Eyewitness evidence obtained with the self-administered interview© is unaffected by stress. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanciano, T., Curci, A., Mastandrea, S., & Sartori, G. (2013). Do automatic mental associations detect a flashbulb memory? Memory, 21(4), 482–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanciano, T., Curci, A., Matera, G., & Sartori, G. (2018). Measuring the flashbulb-like nature of memories for private events: The flashbulb memory checklist. Memory, 26(8), 1053–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rooy, D., Pipe, M. E., & Murray, J. E. (2005). Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children’s eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 235–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. F. (1992). Potential flashbulb: Memories of ordinary news as the baseline. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb memories” (pp. 32–64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luminet, O., & Curci, A. (2017). Flashbulb memories: New challenges and future perspectives. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luus, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G., & Ahmetzanov, M. V. (2005). Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm: An experimental analogue of flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 16, 25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. G., Shafto, M., Taylor, J. K., Marian, D. E., Abrams, L., & Dyer, J. R. (2004). Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: Evidence from taboo Stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Memory and Cognition, 32, 474–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M. (2002). Retrieval-induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: Forgetting as a consequence of remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G., & Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melinder, A., & Magnussen, S. (2015). Psychologists and psychiatrists serving as expert witnesses in court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (2017). Distilling the confidence-accuracy message: A comment on Wixted and Wells (2017). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1982). Snapshots or benchmaks? In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed (pp. 43–48). San Francisco: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories (pp. 9–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., Wolters, G., & van Giezen, A. (2013). Accuracy, confidence and consistency in repeated recall of events. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 629–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeberst, A. (2015). How good are future lawyers in judging the accuracy of reminiscent details? The estimation-observation gap in real eyewitness accounts. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7, 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. G., & Roediger, H. L. I. I. I. (1987). Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 100, 145–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrod, S., & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 817–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Cognition, 16, 63–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakken, H. (2014). On direct and indirect probabilistic reasoning in legal proof. Law, Probability and Risk, 13, 327–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J. R. (2002). Suggestibility, reliability, and the legal process. Developmental Review, 22, 334–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, M., Krix, A. C., van Kan, N., Glunz, S., & Sak, A. (2014). Speaking is silver, writing is golden? The role of cognitive and social factors in written versus spoken witness accounts. Memory & Cognition, 42, 978–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmolck, H., Buffalo, E. A., & Squire, L. R. (2000). Memory distortions develop over time: Recollections of O. J. Simpson trial verdict after 15 and 32 months. Psychological Science, 11, 39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, S. E., & Benjamin, A. S. (2016). That’s not what you said the first time: A theoretical account of the relationship between consistency and accuracy of recall. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children's repeated lies and truths: Effects on adults’ judgments and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345–356.
   Google Scholar
• Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorley, C., & Kumar, D. (2017). Eyewitness susceptibility to co-witness misinformation is influenced by co-witness confidence and own self-confidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 342–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, J. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2011). How emotion leads to selective memory: Neuroimaging evidence. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1831–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Olson, E., & Charman, S. (2002). Eyewitness identification confidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 151–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel, I., De Kooy, P. V., & Merckelbach, H. (2000). Differential recall of central and peripheral details of emotional slides is not a stable phenomenon. Memory, 8, 95–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winningham, R. G., Hyman, I. E., & Dinnel, D. L. (2000). Flashbulb memories? The effects of when the initial memory report was obtained. Memory, 8, 209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, R. A., Sartori, G., Magnussen, S., & Safer, M. A. (2014). An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., Mickes, L., Clark, S. E., Gronlund, S. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2015). Initial eyewitness confidence reliably predicts eyewitness identification accuracy. American Psychologist, 70, 515–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 10–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B. (1993). Recall of the Hillsborough disaster over time: Systematic biases of ‘Flashbulb’ memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Mathews, S., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2005). Social recognition memory. The effect of other people’s responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 200–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2007). Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses. Psychological Science, 18(2), 172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar