Effects of perceptual load on eyewitness memory are moderated by individual differences in cognitive ability

References

• Bailey, H. (2012). Computer-paced versus experimenter-paced working memory span tasks: Are they equally reliable and valid? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 875–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences and speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialek, M., & Pennycook, G. (2018). The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 1953–1959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, H., & Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of multiple dependent variables. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eayrs, J., & Lavie, N. (2018). Establishing individual differences in perceptual capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). False memories of fabricated political events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 280–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrie, M. P., & Garry, M. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity affect false memories for missing aspects of events. Memory, 15(5), 561–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, C. M., Murphy, G., & Januszewski, J. (2017). Under high perceptual load, observers look but do not see. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 431–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, E. I., & Kusterer, D. J. (2011). Behavioral biases and cognitive reflection. Economics Letters, 110(2), 97–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M.-H., & Hauser, R. M. (1996). Trends in black-white test score differentials: II. The WORDSUM vocabulary test: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, I. E., Sarb, B. A., & Wise-Swanson, B. M. (2014). Failure to see money on a tree: Inattentional blindness for objects that guided behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyman, I. E., Wulff, A. N., & Thomas, A. K. (2018). Crime blindness: How selective attention and inattentional blindness can disrupt eyewitness awareness and memory. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski, U., & Wentura, D. (2002). Misleading postevent information and working memory capacity: An individual differences approach to eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. M. (2006). Dividing attention during a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. doi: 10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus”. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Load induced blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1078–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N., Krosnick, J. A., & Haertel, E. (2007). The psychometric properties of the GSS Wordsum vocabulary test. GSS Methodological Report, 11, 1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Meisenberg, G. (2015). Verbal ability as a predictor of political preferences in the United States, 1974–2012. Intelligence, 50, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Perceptual load affects eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to leading questions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1322. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2017a). The elephant in the road: Auditory perceptual load affects driver perception and awareness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 258–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2017b). Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 191–202. doi: 10.1037/cep0000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2017c). Visual feature vs. conjunction searches as a robust manipulation of perceptual load. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 305–326. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1256888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., Loftus, E. F., Grady, R. H., Levine, L. J., & Greene, C. M. (2019). False memories for fake news during Ireland’s abortion referendum. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1449–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Murphy, L. (2018). Perceptual load affects change blindness in a real-world interaction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 655–660. doi: 10.1002/acp.3441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. L. (1998). Unusualness and threat as possible causes of “weapon focus”. Memory, 6(3), 277–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Jacoby, J. D., & McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 300–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, J. (2009). Memory impairment in the weapon focus effect. Memory & Cognition, 37(3), 326–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. doi: 10.1068/p281059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L., & Gallup, G. H. (1944). Verbal intelligence of the American adult. The Journal of General Psychology, 30(1), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Poole, B. J., & Conway, A. R. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(1), 76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilford, M. M., Chan, J. C., & Tuhn, S. J. (2014). Retrieval enhances eyewitness suggestibility to misinformation in free and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(1), 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1998). Processing resources and eyewitness suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(2), 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., … Dong, Q. (2010). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Cognitive factors. Memory, 18(5), 543–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar