Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction?

References

• Blank, H., & Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R., Jamieson, K. H., & Albarracin, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28, 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaansen, R. E., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and postevent information. Memory & Cognition, 11, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrobak, Q. M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2008). Inventing stories: Forcing witnesses to fabricate entire fictitious events leads to freely reported false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrobak, Q. M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2013). When forced fabrications become the truth: Causal explanations and false memory development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. (2019). Correcting the misinformation effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., & Antonio, L. (2020). Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qt4w8
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Apai, J. (2011). Terrorists brought down the plane! – No, actually it was a technical fault: Processing corrections of emotive information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.497927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cheung, C. S. C., & Maybery, M. T. (2015). He did it! She did it! No, she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation. Journal of Memory and Language, 85, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Fenton, O., & Martin, K. (2014). Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 292–304. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0358-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 570–578. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Swire, B., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Correcting misinformation: A challenge to education and cognitive science. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Applied and theoretical perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 13–38). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ecterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussey, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33, 770–782. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2012). Log-linear analysis. Statistical Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. (Producer), & Sullivan, K. (Director) (1989). Looking for miracles [Motion picture]. Sullivan Entertainment.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. J., & Geraci, L. (2013). Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility. Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition, 2, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. J., & Geraci, L. (2010). The persistence of inferences in memory for younger and older adults: Remembering facts and believing inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, A., Ecker, U., & Brinberg, D. (2020). How stories in memory perpetuate the continued influence of false information. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(2), 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higham, P. A., Blank, H., & Luna, K. (2017). Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ithisuphalap, J., Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections? Memory, 28(3), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1752731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hastroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1999). Modifying mental representations: Comprehending corrections. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Gold-man (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 303–318). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(3), 854–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029468
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, T. J., Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. (2017). Memory errors in police interviews: The bait question as a source of misinformation. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. A., & Ost, J. (Eds.). (2017). False and distorted memories. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oeberst, A., & Blank, H. (2012). Undoing the suggestive influence on memory: The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect. Cognition, 125(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rear, A. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2020). Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect. Memory & Cognition, 48, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00967-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2007). Revising what readers know: Updating text representations during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2019–2032. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016). The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). Correcting misinformation in news stories: An investigation of correction timing and correction durability. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, A., Gabbert, F., & La Rooy, D. (Eds.). (2013). Suggestibility in legal contexts: Psychological research and forensic implications. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rindal, E. J., Chrobak, Q. M., Zaragoza, M. S., & Weihing, C. A. (2017). Mechanisms of eyewitness suggestibility: Tests of the explanatory role hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1413–1425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1201-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, T. A., & Sergeant, S. D. (1998). The role of commitment in producing misinformation effects in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoboria, A., Wade, K. A., Lindsay, D. S., Azad, T., Strange, D., Ost, J., & Hyman, I. E. (2017). A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory, 25(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1260747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, C. M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 41, 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), Article 160802. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swire, B., Ecker, U. K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(12), 1948. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T. (2005). The role of causal reasoning in understanding narratives. In T. Trabosso, J. Sabatini, D. W. Massaro, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky (pp. 81–106). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J., & Pezdek, K. (1998). Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect. Psychonmic Bulletin & Review, 5, 449–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2008). Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, A. L., & Leatherbarrow, M. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 40, 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000168
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes, A. L., & Reynolds, D. J. (1999). On certain limitations accompanying readers’ interpretations of corrections in episodic text. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B. (1993). Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: A new testing procedure to differentiate explanations. Memory, 1(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658219308258229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2004). Updating situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7383.30.1.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar